From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bNNvi-0008Hu-JO for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:26:42 +0000 From: "Manoharan, Rajkumar" Subject: Re: Anyone brought up 9984 NIC on x86-64? Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:26:09 +0000 Message-ID: <1468430769350.75672@qti.qualcomm.com> References: <578673DA.1010907@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: <578673DA.1010907@candelatech.com> Content-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Ben Greear , ath10k > I added a few patches to my 4.7 kernel to enable ath10k to load for 9984, > but it immediately crashes due to IOMMU error when trying to allocate > memory. > > I'm building the latest linux-ath tree now and will test that when it > is done, but I am curious to know if anyone has successfully booted > 9984 on x86-64? > Ben, Are you seeing IOMMU error even after wtih your DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL change? Could you please try with https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9175029/ But increase WMI_MAX_MEM_CHUNK_SIZE to 512. -Rajkumar _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k