All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915: Unify request submission
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:03:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469174599.5916.8.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469020330-1071-13-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

On ke, 2016-07-20 at 14:12 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Move request submission from emit_request into its own common vfunc
> from i915_add_request().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c    |  7 +++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c |  9 ++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h           |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c           | 10 +++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c    | 26 ++++++++++----------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h    | 23 +++++++++++------------
>  6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> index 408f390a4c98..3e633b47213c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> @@ -469,12 +469,10 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
>  	 */
>  	request->postfix = intel_ring_get_tail(ring);
>  
> -	if (i915.enable_execlists)
> -		ret = engine->emit_request(request);
> -	else
> -		ret = engine->add_request(request);
>  	/* Not allowed to fail! */
> +	ret = engine->emit_request(request);
>  	WARN(ret, "emit|add_request failed: %d!\n", ret);

You should fix the message too; s/|add//

> +
>  	/* Sanity check that the reserved size was large enough. */
>  	ret = intel_ring_get_tail(ring) - request_start;
>  	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -485,6 +483,7 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
>  		  reserved_tail, ret);
>  
>  	i915_gem_mark_busy(engine);
> +	engine->submit_request(request);
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned long local_clock_us(unsigned int *cpu)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> index eccd34832fe6..32d0e1890950 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static int guc_ring_doorbell(struct i915_guc_client *gc)
>   * The only error here arises if the doorbell hardware isn't functioning
>   * as expected, which really shouln't happen.
>   */
> -int i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
> +static void i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>  {
>  	unsigned int engine_id = rq->engine->id;
>  	struct intel_guc *guc = &rq->i915->guc;
> @@ -602,8 +602,6 @@ int i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>  
>  	guc->submissions[engine_id] += 1;
>  	guc->last_seqno[engine_id] = rq->fence.seqno;
> -
> -	return b_ret;

Maybe we should have WARN(b_ret, "sumthing")? Although I see the return
value was not handled previously. CC'ing Dave to comment on too.

>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -992,6 +990,7 @@ int i915_guc_submission_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
>  	struct i915_guc_client *client;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>  
>  	/* client for execbuf submission */
>  	client = guc_client_alloc(dev_priv,
> @@ -1006,6 +1005,10 @@ int i915_guc_submission_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	host2guc_sample_forcewake(guc, client);
>  	guc_init_doorbell_hw(guc);
>  
> +	/* Take over from manual control of ELSP (execlists) */
> +	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv)
> +		engine->submit_request = i915_guc_submit;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
> index 3e3e743740c0..623cf26cd784 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
> @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ extern int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_device *dev);
>  int i915_guc_submission_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  int i915_guc_submission_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
> -int i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
>  void i915_guc_submission_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void i915_guc_submission_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index d17a193e8eaf..52edbcc9bca0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -773,12 +773,6 @@ intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>  	 */
>  	request->previous_context = engine->last_context;
>  	engine->last_context = request->ctx;
> -
> -	if (i915.enable_guc_submission)
> -		i915_guc_submit(request);
> -	else
> -		execlists_context_queue(request);
> -

Function name is still advance_and_submit, and now the call to submit
is moved to add_request, I'm confused.

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1904,8 +1898,10 @@ logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  {
>  	/* Default vfuncs which can be overriden by each engine. */
>  	engine->init_hw = gen8_init_common_ring;
> -	engine->emit_request = gen8_emit_request;
>  	engine->emit_flush = gen8_emit_flush;
> +	engine->emit_request = gen8_emit_request;
> +	engine->submit_request = execlists_context_queue;

execlists_context_queue name could be changed too, just defined and one
calling site.

> +
>  	engine->irq_enable = gen8_logical_ring_enable_irq;
>  	engine->irq_disable = gen8_logical_ring_disable_irq;
>  	engine->emit_bb_start = gen8_emit_bb_start;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 43dfa4be1cfd..907d933d62aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1427,15 +1427,14 @@ static int gen6_signal(struct drm_i915_gem_request *signaller_req,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * gen6_add_request - Update the semaphore mailbox registers
> + * gen6_emit_request - Update the semaphore mailbox registers
>   *
>   * @request - request to write to the ring
>   *
>   * Update the mailbox registers in the *other* rings with the current seqno.
>   * This acts like a signal in the canonical semaphore.
>   */
> -static int
> -gen6_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> +static int gen6_emit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>  {
>  	struct intel_ring *ring = req->ring;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -1456,13 +1455,10 @@ gen6_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>  
>  	req->tail = intel_ring_get_tail(ring);
>  
> -	req->engine->submit_request(req);
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int
> -gen8_render_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> +static int gen8_render_emit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>  {
>  	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = req->engine;
>  	struct intel_ring *ring = req->ring;
> @@ -1486,8 +1482,9 @@ gen8_render_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>  	intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
>  	intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_USER_INTERRUPT);
>  	intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
> +	intel_ring_advance(ring);
>  
> -	req->engine->submit_request(req);
> +	req->tail = intel_ring_get_tail(ring);

Ditto req->tail = ring->tail;

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1692,8 +1689,7 @@ bsd_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int
> -i9xx_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> +static int i9xx_emit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>  {
>  	struct intel_ring *ring = req->ring;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -1710,8 +1706,6 @@ i9xx_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>  
>  	req->tail = intel_ring_get_tail(ring);
>  
> -	req->engine->submit_request(req);
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2813,11 +2807,11 @@ static void intel_ring_default_vfuncs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  				      struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  {
>  	engine->init_hw = init_ring_common;
> -	engine->submit_request = i9xx_submit_request;
>  
> -	engine->add_request = i9xx_add_request;
> +	engine->emit_request = i9xx_emit_request;
>  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6)
> -		engine->add_request = gen6_add_request;
> +		engine->emit_request = gen6_emit_request;
> +	engine->submit_request = i9xx_submit_request;
>  
>  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
>  		engine->emit_bb_start = gen8_emit_bb_start;
> @@ -2846,7 +2840,7 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  
>  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) {
>  		engine->init_context = intel_rcs_ctx_init;
> -		engine->add_request = gen8_render_add_request;
> +		engine->emit_request = gen8_render_emit_request;
>  		engine->emit_flush = gen8_render_ring_flush;
>  		if (i915.semaphores)
>  			engine->semaphore.signal = gen8_rcs_signal;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 1a38c383327e..856b732ddbbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -204,7 +204,17 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
>  
>  	int		(*init_context)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req);
>  
> -	int		(*add_request)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req);
> +	int		(*emit_flush)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
> +				      u32 invalidate_domains,
> +				      u32 flush_domains);
> +	int		(*emit_bb_start)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> +					 u64 offset, u32 length,
> +					 unsigned int dispatch_flags);
> +#define I915_DISPATCH_SECURE 0x1
> +#define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2
> +#define I915_DISPATCH_RS     0x4

Same here, maybe BIT(0) etc?

Really like how the code looks more consistent now!

Regards, Joonas

> +	int		(*emit_request)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req);
> +	void		(*submit_request)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req);
>  	/* Some chipsets are not quite as coherent as advertised and need
>  	 * an expensive kick to force a true read of the up-to-date seqno.
>  	 * However, the up-to-date seqno is not always required and the last
> @@ -282,17 +292,6 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
>  	unsigned int idle_lite_restore_wa;
>  	bool disable_lite_restore_wa;
>  	u32 ctx_desc_template;
> -	int		(*emit_request)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request);
> -	int		(*emit_flush)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
> -				      u32 invalidate_domains,
> -				      u32 flush_domains);
> -	int		(*emit_bb_start)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> -					 u64 offset, u32 length,
> -					 unsigned int dispatch_flags);
> -#define I915_DISPATCH_SECURE 0x1
> -#define I915_DISPATCH_PINNED 0x2
> -#define I915_DISPATCH_RS     0x4
> -	void		(*submit_request)(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req);
>  
>  	/**
>  	 * List of objects currently involved in rendering from the
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-22  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-20 13:11 Unify request construction Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 13:11 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915: Unify intel_logical_ring_emit and intel_ring_emit Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 11:26   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-21 12:09     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 13:11 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915: Rename request->ringbuf to request->ring Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 14:12   ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 14:51     ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 15:00     ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Convert stray struct intel_engine_cs *ring Chris Wilson
2016-07-27 13:15       ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-21 11:28   ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915: Rename request->ringbuf to request->ring Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:11 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915: Rename backpointer from intel_ringbuffer to intel_engine_cs Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 14:23   ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-21 11:32   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-21 11:42     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 13:11 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915: Rename intel_context[engine].ringbuf Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 11:43   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:11 ` [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915: Rename struct intel_ringbuffer to struct intel_ring Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 11:59   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-21 16:02     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 13:11 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915: Rename residual ringbuf parameters Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 12:01   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-21 12:20     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 13:11 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915: Rename intel_pin_and_map_ring() Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 12:02   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915: Remove obsolete engine->gpu_caches_dirty Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915: Simplify request_alloc by returning the allocated request Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 13:07   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-21 13:18     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915: Unify legacy/execlists emission of MI_BATCHBUFFER_START Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 13:39   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-21 14:14     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-27 15:04       ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-27 15:19         ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915: Convert engine->write_tail to operate on a request Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 13:52   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915: Unify request submission Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  8:03   ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2016-07-22  8:24     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-27 17:51     ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-27 18:09       ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-27 18:17         ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-28 10:25         ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-28 11:49           ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915: Stop passing caller's num_dwords to engine->semaphore.signal() Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  8:15   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-22  8:30     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  9:06       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915: Reuse legacy breadcrumbs + tail emission Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  8:34   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/ringbuffer: Specialise SNB+ request emission for semaphores Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 13:55   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-21 14:10     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  9:42       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915: Remove duplicate golden render state init from execlists Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 14:18   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-21 16:27     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 16:37       ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  9:53         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-22 10:16           ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Refactor golden render state emission to unconfuse gcc Chris Wilson
2016-07-22 10:33             ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915: Unify legacy/execlists submit_execbuf callbacks Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  8:45   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:12 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915: Simplify calling engine->sync_to Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  8:59   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-22  9:14     ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename engine->semaphore.sync_to, engine->sempahore.signal locals Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  9:28       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-22  9:31         ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-22  9:38           ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 13:54 ` ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [01/18] drm/i915: Unify intel_logical_ring_emit and intel_ring_emit Patchwork
2016-07-20 15:10 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/18] drm/i915: Unify intel_logical_ring_emit and intel_ring_emit (rev2) Patchwork
2016-07-22  9:58 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/18] drm/i915: Unify intel_logical_ring_emit and intel_ring_emit (rev4) Patchwork
2016-07-22 10:22 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/18] drm/i915: Unify intel_logical_ring_emit and intel_ring_emit (rev5) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1469174599.5916.8.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.