From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com, ekorenevsky@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1 is in long mode." has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:05:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <146940150296253@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1 is in long mode.
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
kvm-nvmx-vmx-instructions-fix-segment-checks-when-l1-is-in-long-mode.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From ff30ef40deca4658e27b0c596e7baf39115e858f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:01:05 +0200
Subject: KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1 is in long mode.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
commit ff30ef40deca4658e27b0c596e7baf39115e858f upstream.
I couldn't get Xen to boot a L2 HVM when it was nested under KVM - it was
getting a GP(0) on a rather unspecial vmread from Xen:
(XEN) ----[ Xen-4.7.0-rc x86_64 debug=n Not tainted ]----
(XEN) CPU: 1
(XEN) RIP: e008:[<ffff82d0801e629e>] vmx_get_segment_register+0x14e/0x450
(XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000010202 CONTEXT: hypervisor (d1v0)
(XEN) rax: ffff82d0801e6288 rbx: ffff83003ffbfb7c rcx: fffffffffffab928
(XEN) rdx: 0000000000000000 rsi: 0000000000000000 rdi: ffff83000bdd0000
(XEN) rbp: ffff83000bdd0000 rsp: ffff83003ffbfab0 r8: ffff830038813910
(XEN) r9: ffff83003faf3958 r10: 0000000a3b9f7640 r11: ffff83003f82d418
(XEN) r12: 0000000000000000 r13: ffff83003ffbffff r14: 0000000000004802
(XEN) r15: 0000000000000008 cr0: 0000000080050033 cr4: 00000000001526e0
(XEN) cr3: 000000003fc79000 cr2: 0000000000000000
(XEN) ds: 0000 es: 0000 fs: 0000 gs: 0000 ss: 0000 cs: e008
(XEN) Xen code around <ffff82d0801e629e> (vmx_get_segment_register+0x14e/0x450):
(XEN) 00 00 41 be 02 48 00 00 <44> 0f 78 74 24 08 0f 86 38 56 00 00 b8 08 68 00
(XEN) Xen stack trace from rsp=ffff83003ffbfab0:
...
(XEN) Xen call trace:
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801e629e>] vmx_get_segment_register+0x14e/0x450
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801f3695>] get_page_from_gfn_p2m+0x165/0x300
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801bfe32>] hvmemul_get_seg_reg+0x52/0x60
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801bfe93>] hvm_emulate_prepare+0x53/0x70
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801ccacb>] handle_mmio+0x2b/0xd0
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801be591>] emulate.c#_hvm_emulate_one+0x111/0x2c0
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801cd6a4>] handle_hvm_io_completion+0x274/0x2a0
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801f334a>] __get_gfn_type_access+0xfa/0x270
(XEN) [<ffff82d08012f3bb>] timer.c#add_entry+0x4b/0xb0
(XEN) [<ffff82d08012f80c>] timer.c#remove_entry+0x7c/0x90
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801c8433>] hvm_do_resume+0x23/0x140
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801e4fe7>] vmx_do_resume+0xa7/0x140
(XEN) [<ffff82d080164aeb>] context_switch+0x13b/0xe40
(XEN) [<ffff82d080128e6e>] schedule.c#schedule+0x22e/0x570
(XEN) [<ffff82d08012c0cc>] softirq.c#__do_softirq+0x5c/0x90
(XEN) [<ffff82d0801602c5>] domain.c#idle_loop+0x25/0x50
(XEN)
(XEN)
(XEN) ****************************************
(XEN) Panic on CPU 1:
(XEN) GENERAL PROTECTION FAULT
(XEN) [error_code=0000]
(XEN) ****************************************
Tracing my host KVM showed it was the one injecting the GP(0) when
emulating the VMREAD and checking the destination segment permissions in
get_vmx_mem_address():
3) | vmx_handle_exit() {
3) | handle_vmread() {
3) | nested_vmx_check_permission() {
3) | vmx_get_segment() {
3) 0.074 us | vmx_read_guest_seg_base();
3) 0.065 us | vmx_read_guest_seg_selector();
3) 0.066 us | vmx_read_guest_seg_ar();
3) 1.636 us | }
3) 0.058 us | vmx_get_rflags();
3) 0.062 us | vmx_read_guest_seg_ar();
3) 3.469 us | }
3) | vmx_get_cs_db_l_bits() {
3) 0.058 us | vmx_read_guest_seg_ar();
3) 0.662 us | }
3) | get_vmx_mem_address() {
3) 0.068 us | vmx_cache_reg();
3) | vmx_get_segment() {
3) 0.074 us | vmx_read_guest_seg_base();
3) 0.068 us | vmx_read_guest_seg_selector();
3) 0.071 us | vmx_read_guest_seg_ar();
3) 1.756 us | }
3) | kvm_queue_exception_e() {
3) 0.066 us | kvm_multiple_exception();
3) 0.684 us | }
3) 4.085 us | }
3) 9.833 us | }
3) + 10.366 us | }
Cross-checking the KVM/VMX VMREAD emulation code with the Intel Software
Developper Manual Volume 3C - "VMREAD - Read Field from Virtual-Machine
Control Structure", I found that we're enforcing that the destination
operand is NOT located in a read-only data segment or any code segment when
the L1 is in long mode - BUT that check should only happen when it is in
protected mode.
Shuffling the code a bit to make our emulation follow the specification
allows me to boot a Xen dom0 in a nested KVM and start HVM L2 guests
without problems.
Fixes: f9eb4af67c9d ("KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: add checks for #GP/#SS exceptions")
Signed-off-by: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
Cc: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -6579,7 +6579,13 @@ static int get_vmx_mem_address(struct kv
/* Checks for #GP/#SS exceptions. */
exn = false;
- if (is_protmode(vcpu)) {
+ if (is_long_mode(vcpu)) {
+ /* Long mode: #GP(0)/#SS(0) if the memory address is in a
+ * non-canonical form. This is the only check on the memory
+ * destination for long mode!
+ */
+ exn = is_noncanonical_address(*ret);
+ } else if (is_protmode(vcpu)) {
/* Protected mode: apply checks for segment validity in the
* following order:
* - segment type check (#GP(0) may be thrown)
@@ -6596,17 +6602,10 @@ static int get_vmx_mem_address(struct kv
* execute-only code segment
*/
exn = ((s.type & 0xa) == 8);
- }
- if (exn) {
- kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, GP_VECTOR, 0);
- return 1;
- }
- if (is_long_mode(vcpu)) {
- /* Long mode: #GP(0)/#SS(0) if the memory address is in a
- * non-canonical form. This is an only check for long mode.
- */
- exn = is_noncanonical_address(*ret);
- } else if (is_protmode(vcpu)) {
+ if (exn) {
+ kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, GP_VECTOR, 0);
+ return 1;
+ }
/* Protected mode: #GP(0)/#SS(0) if the segment is unusable.
*/
exn = (s.unusable != 0);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com are
queue-4.4/kvm-nvmx-vmx-instructions-fix-segment-checks-when-l1-is-in-long-mode.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-07-24 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=146940150296253@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ekorenevsky@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.