From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: oded.gabbay@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "drm/amdkfd: unbind only existing processes" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:55:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469404558186184@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/amdkfd: unbind only existing processes
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-amdkfd-unbind-only-existing-processes.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 121b78e679ee3ffab780115e260b2775d0cc1f73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 08:41:08 +0300
Subject: drm/amdkfd: unbind only existing processes
From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
commit 121b78e679ee3ffab780115e260b2775d0cc1f73 upstream.
When unbinding a process from a device (initiated by amd_iommu_v2), the
driver needs to make sure that process still exists in the process table.
There is a possibility that amdkfd's own notifier handler -
kfd_process_notifier_release() - was called before the unbind function
and it already removed the process from the process table.
v2:
Because there can be only one process with the specified pasid, and
because *p can't be NULL inside the hash_for_each_rcu macro, it is more
reasonable to just put the whole code inside the if statement that
compares the pasid value. That way, when we exit hash_for_each_rcu, we
simply exit the function as well.
Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
@@ -404,42 +404,52 @@ void kfd_unbind_process_from_device(stru
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kfd_processes_srcu);
+ /*
+ * Look for the process that matches the pasid. If there is no such
+ * process, we either released it in amdkfd's own notifier, or there
+ * is a bug. Unfortunately, there is no way to tell...
+ */
hash_for_each_rcu(kfd_processes_table, i, p, kfd_processes)
- if (p->pasid == pasid)
- break;
+ if (p->pasid == pasid) {
- srcu_read_unlock(&kfd_processes_srcu, idx);
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kfd_processes_srcu, idx);
- BUG_ON(p->pasid != pasid);
+ pr_debug("Unbinding process %d from IOMMU\n", pasid);
- mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
- if ((dev->dbgmgr) && (dev->dbgmgr->pasid == p->pasid))
- kfd_dbgmgr_destroy(dev->dbgmgr);
+ if ((dev->dbgmgr) && (dev->dbgmgr->pasid == p->pasid))
+ kfd_dbgmgr_destroy(dev->dbgmgr);
- pqm_uninit(&p->pqm);
+ pqm_uninit(&p->pqm);
- pdd = kfd_get_process_device_data(dev, p);
+ pdd = kfd_get_process_device_data(dev, p);
- if (!pdd) {
- mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
- return;
- }
+ if (!pdd) {
+ mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
+ return;
+ }
- if (pdd->reset_wavefronts) {
- dbgdev_wave_reset_wavefronts(pdd->dev, p);
- pdd->reset_wavefronts = false;
- }
+ if (pdd->reset_wavefronts) {
+ dbgdev_wave_reset_wavefronts(pdd->dev, p);
+ pdd->reset_wavefronts = false;
+ }
- /*
- * Just mark pdd as unbound, because we still need it to call
- * amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() in when the process exits.
- * We don't call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() here
- * because the IOMMU called us.
- */
- pdd->bound = false;
+ /*
+ * Just mark pdd as unbound, because we still need it
+ * to call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() in when the
+ * process exits.
+ * We don't call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() here
+ * because the IOMMU called us.
+ */
+ pdd->bound = false;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kfd_processes_srcu, idx);
}
struct kfd_process_device *kfd_get_first_process_device_data(struct kfd_process *p)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from oded.gabbay@gmail.com are
queue-4.6/drm-amdkfd-unbind-only-existing-processes.patch
queue-4.6/drm-amdkfd-destroy-dbgmgr-in-notifier-release.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-07-24 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1469404558186184@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=oded.gabbay@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.