From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <1469729354.16559.30.camel@infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] arm64 kexec-tools patches From: Geoff Levand Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:09:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160726230526.GD28591@verge.net.au> References: <20160726230526.GD28591@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Simon Horman Cc: Pratyush Anand , AKASHI Takahiro , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Simon, On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 08:05 +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > There seems to have been quite a bit of discussion of this patchset. > > I am of a mind to release kexec-tools v2.0.12-rc1 (and thus v2.0.12) > without these changes as the v4.7 kernel is already out and that > is the timing I had in mind for kexec-tools v2.0.12 (the lateness on > my shoulders). > > The implication is the arm64 patches would likely end up in the v2.0.13 > release of kexec-tools which I aim to release around the time of the v4.9 > kernel. OK, this seems reasonable. Early users can build from your sources once the patches are merged if they need support. -Geoff _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: geoff@infradead.org (Geoff Levand) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:09:14 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v1 0/4] arm64 kexec-tools patches In-Reply-To: <20160726230526.GD28591@verge.net.au> References: <20160726230526.GD28591@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <1469729354.16559.30.camel@infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Simon, On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 08:05 +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > There seems to have been quite a bit of discussion of this patchset. > > I am of a mind to release kexec-tools v2.0.12-rc1 (and thus v2.0.12) > without these changes as the v4.7 kernel is already out and that > is the timing I had in mind for kexec-tools v2.0.12 (the lateness on > my shoulders). > > The implication is the arm64 patches would likely end up in the v2.0.13 > release of kexec-tools which I aim to release around the time of the v4.9 > kernel. OK, this seems reasonable. Early users can build from your sources once the patches are merged if they need support. -Geoff