All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Obitotskiy, Aleksey" <aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com>
To: "shli@kernel.org" <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Prevent IO hold during accessing to failed raid5 array
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:07:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469783178.2660.21.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160719224603.GB79792@kernel.org>

Hello,

I would like to know what the status of this patch.
Maybe I should provide more info about?

Regards,
Aleksey

On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 15:46 -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Alexey Obitotskiy wrote:
> > 
> > After array enters in failed state (e.g. number of failed drives
> > becomes more then accepted for raid5 level) it sets error flags
> > (one of this flags is MD_CHANGE_PENDING). This flag prevents to
> > finish all new or non-finished IOs to array and hold them in
> > pending state. In some cases this can leads to deadlock situation.
> > 
> > For example udev handle array state changes (drives becomes faulty)
> > and blkid started but unable to finish reads due to IO hold.
> > At the same time we unable to get exclusive access to array
> > (to stop array in our case) because another external application
> > still use this array (blkid in our case).
> > 
> > Fix makes possible to return IO with errors immediately.
> > So external application can finish working with array and
> > give exclusive access to other applications.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Obitotskiy <aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > index 6c1149d..99471b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> > @@ -4692,7 +4692,9 @@ finish:
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (!bio_list_empty(&s.return_bi)) {
> > -		if (test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &conf->mddev-
> > >flags)) {
> > +		if (test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING, &conf->mddev-
> > >flags) &&
> > +				(s.failed <= conf->max_degraded ||
> > +					conf->mddev->external ==
> > 0)) {
> >  			spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> >  			bio_list_merge(&conf->return_bi,
> > &s.return_bi);
> >  			spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-29  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-15 13:24 [PATCH] md: Prevent IO hold during accessing to failed raid5 array Alexey Obitotskiy
2016-07-19 22:46 ` Shaohua Li
2016-07-20  6:25   ` Obitotskiy, Aleksey
2016-07-29  9:07   ` Obitotskiy, Aleksey [this message]
2016-07-30 21:01     ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1469783178.2660.21.camel@intel.com \
    --to=aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.