From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: vgupta@synopsys.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ARC: unwind: ensure that .debug_frame is generated (vs. .eh_frame)" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 09:04:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470121467112196@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ARC: unwind: ensure that .debug_frame is generated (vs. .eh_frame)
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arc-unwind-ensure-that-.debug_frame-is-generated-vs.-.eh_frame.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From f52e126cc7476196f44f3c313b7d9f0699a881fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:42:25 +0530
Subject: ARC: unwind: ensure that .debug_frame is generated (vs. .eh_frame)
From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
commit f52e126cc7476196f44f3c313b7d9f0699a881fc upstream.
With recent binutils update to support dwarf CFI pseudo-ops in gas, we
now get .eh_frame vs. .debug_frame. Although the call frame info is
exactly the same in both, the CIE differs, which the current kernel
unwinder can't cope with.
This broke both the kernel unwinder as well as loadable modules (latter
because of a new unhandled relo R_ARC_32_PCREL from .rela.eh_frame in
the module loader)
The ideal solution would be to switch unwinder to .eh_frame.
For now however we can make do by just ensureing .debug_frame is
generated by removing -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
.eh_frame generated with -gdwarf-2 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
.debug_frame generated with -gdwarf-2
Fixes STAR 9001058196
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arc/Makefile | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arc/Makefile
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ endif
endif
-cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_DW2_UNWIND) += -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-
# By default gcc 4.8 generates dwarf4 which kernel unwinder can't grok
ifeq ($(atleast_gcc48),y)
cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_DW2_UNWIND) += -gdwarf-2
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vgupta@synopsys.com are
queue-4.6/arc-unwind-warn-only-once-if-dw2_unwind-is-disabled.patch
queue-4.6/arc-unwind-ensure-that-.debug_frame-is-generated-vs.-.eh_frame.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470121467112196@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.