Re: [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915: Tidy generation of the GTT mmap offset

[Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>]

On to, 2016-08-04 at 08:30 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:25:42AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > 
> > On ma, 2016-08-01 at 19:22 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > 
> > > If we make the observation that mmap-offsets are only released when we
> > > free an object, we can then deduce that the shrinker only creates free
> > > space in the mmap arena indirectly by flushing the request list and
> > > freeing expired objects. If we combine this with the lockless
> > > vma-manager and lockless idling, we can avoid taking our big struct_mutex
> > > until we need to actually free the requests.
> > > 
> > > One side-effect is that we defer the madvise checking until we need the
> > > pages (i.e. the fault handler). This brings us into line with the other
> > > delayed checks (and madvise in general).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Don't necessarily agree with all the "== 0", because it's in the
> > minority but;
> How about if I take this opportunity to start a new life using
> 
> int err;
> if (!err) ...

"int ret;" is quite de facto and if (!ret) too;

$ git grep '!ret\b' | wc -l
3826
$ git grep 'ret == 0\b' | wc -l
1869
$ git grep '!err\b' | wc -l
2064

So I'm inclined towards ret and !ret...

Regards, Joonas

> 
> ?
> -Chris
> 
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx