From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mike.marciniszyn@intel.com, dennis.dalessandro@intel.com,
dledford@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] IB/hfi1: Correct issues with sc5 computation" failed to apply to 4.6-stable tree
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:07:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470665243190198@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 896ce45da2c2f4abc508d443fdecde7de0b3fa7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:57:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] IB/hfi1: Correct issues with sc5 computation
There are several computatations of the sc in the
ud receive routine.
Besides the code duplication, all are wrong when the
sc is greater than 15. In that case the code incorrectly
or's a 1 into the computed sc instead of 1 shifted left
by 4.
Fix precomputed sc5 by using an already implemented routine
hdr2sc() and deleting flawed duplicated code.
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.6+
Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ud.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ud.c
index 1e503ad0bebb..be91f6fa1c87 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ud.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ud.c
@@ -678,8 +678,7 @@ void hfi1_ud_rcv(struct hfi1_packet *packet)
u32 tlen = packet->tlen;
struct rvt_qp *qp = packet->qp;
bool has_grh = rcv_flags & HFI1_HAS_GRH;
- bool sc4_bit = has_sc4_bit(packet);
- u8 sc;
+ u8 sc5 = hdr2sc((struct hfi1_message_header *)hdr, packet->rhf);
u32 bth1;
int is_mcast;
struct ib_grh *grh = NULL;
@@ -697,10 +696,8 @@ void hfi1_ud_rcv(struct hfi1_packet *packet)
*/
struct hfi1_pportdata *ppd = ppd_from_ibp(ibp);
u32 lqpn = be32_to_cpu(ohdr->bth[1]) & RVT_QPN_MASK;
- u8 sl, sc5;
+ u8 sl;
- sc5 = (be16_to_cpu(hdr->lrh[0]) >> 12) & 0xf;
- sc5 |= sc4_bit;
sl = ibp->sc_to_sl[sc5];
process_becn(ppd, sl, 0, lqpn, 0, IB_CC_SVCTYPE_UD);
@@ -717,10 +714,6 @@ void hfi1_ud_rcv(struct hfi1_packet *packet)
if (!is_mcast && (opcode != IB_OPCODE_CNP) && bth1 & HFI1_FECN_SMASK) {
u16 slid = be16_to_cpu(hdr->lrh[3]);
- u8 sc5;
-
- sc5 = (be16_to_cpu(hdr->lrh[0]) >> 12) & 0xf;
- sc5 |= sc4_bit;
return_cnp(ibp, qp, src_qp, pkey, dlid, slid, sc5, grh);
}
@@ -745,10 +738,6 @@ void hfi1_ud_rcv(struct hfi1_packet *packet)
if (qp->ibqp.qp_num > 1) {
struct hfi1_pportdata *ppd = ppd_from_ibp(ibp);
u16 slid;
- u8 sc5;
-
- sc5 = (be16_to_cpu(hdr->lrh[0]) >> 12) & 0xf;
- sc5 |= sc4_bit;
slid = be16_to_cpu(hdr->lrh[3]);
if (unlikely(rcv_pkey_check(ppd, pkey, sc5, slid))) {
@@ -790,10 +779,6 @@ void hfi1_ud_rcv(struct hfi1_packet *packet)
/* Received on QP0, and so by definition, this is an SMP */
struct opa_smp *smp = (struct opa_smp *)data;
u16 slid = be16_to_cpu(hdr->lrh[3]);
- u8 sc5;
-
- sc5 = (be16_to_cpu(hdr->lrh[0]) >> 12) & 0xf;
- sc5 |= sc4_bit;
if (opa_smp_check(ibp, pkey, sc5, qp, slid, smp))
goto drop;
@@ -890,9 +875,7 @@ void hfi1_ud_rcv(struct hfi1_packet *packet)
}
wc.slid = be16_to_cpu(hdr->lrh[3]);
- sc = (be16_to_cpu(hdr->lrh[0]) >> 12) & 0xf;
- sc |= sc4_bit;
- wc.sl = ibp->sc_to_sl[sc];
+ wc.sl = ibp->sc_to_sl[sc5];
/*
* Save the LMC lower bits if the destination LID is a unicast LID.
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-08 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-08 14:07 gregkh [this message]
2016-08-08 19:53 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] IB/hfi1: Correct issues with sc5 computation" failed to apply to 4.6-stable tree Marciniszyn, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470665243190198@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.