All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jose Lamego <jose.a.lamego@linux.intel.com>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, "Lock,
	Joshua" <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] oeqa: Split configuration from the code
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:09:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470744566.8166.48.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1470671417.git.jose.a.lamego@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 09:22 -0700, Jose Lamego wrote:
> Improve oeqa-selftest capabilities and UX by placing
> test configuration features and variables into a separate
> configuration file.
> Configuration file reading is done through a new library in
> oeqa.utils and specific configuration files for each test are
> stored in a separate directory.
> 
> [Yocto 9389]

Looking at these changes, I'm not 100% convinced this is an improvement
in readability or experience. Right now, I can look at the test case
definition and get a reasonable idea of what its doing. After the
change, I have to read two files at once, side by side in order to have
a clue what the test does. Is that an improvement?

I'm open to persuasion on why this patchset is a good idea but the
pieces I looked at didn't seem to help much :/

Cheers,

Richard


      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-09 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-08 16:22 [PATCH 00/20] oeqa: Split configuration from the code Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 01/20] oeqa.selftest.archiver: Split configuration from code Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 02/20] oeqa.selftest._sstatetests_noauto: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 03/20] oeqa.selftest.bblayers: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 04/20] oeqa.selftest.bbtests: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 05/20] oeqa.selftest.buildhistory: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 06/20] oeqa.selftest.buildoptions: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 07/20] oeqa.selftest.devtool: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 08/20] oeqa.selftest.imagefeatures: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 09/20] oeqa.selftest.layerappend: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 10/20] oeqa.selftest.lic-checksum: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 11/20] oeqa.selftest.manifest: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 12/20] oeqa.selftest.oescripts: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 13/20] oeqa.selftest.pkgdata: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 14/20] oeqa.selftest.prservice: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 15/20] oeqa.selftest.recipetool: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 16/20] oeqa.selftest.runtime-test: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 17/20] oeqa.selftest.signing: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 18/20] oeqa.selftest.sstatetests: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 19/20] oeqa.selftest.wic: " Jose Lamego
2016-08-09  7:26   ` Ed Bartosh
2016-08-09 15:20     ` Jose Lamego
2016-08-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 20/20] oeqa.utils.readconfig: Read self-test configuration file Jose Lamego
2016-08-09  9:19   ` Joshua G Lock
2016-08-09 12:09 ` Richard Purdie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1470744566.8166.48.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jose.a.lamego@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joshua.g.lock@intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.