All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-merrifield.c:518:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'readl'
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 18:51:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470757900.25395.10.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201608080913.KscFPUG3%fengguang.wu@intel.com>

On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 09:41 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
> .git master
> head:   29b4817d4018df78086157ea3a55c1d9424a7cfc
> commit: 4e80c8f505741cbdef3e10862ea36057e8d85e7c pinctrl: intel: Add
> Intel Merrifield pin controller support
> date:   6 weeks ago
> config: x86_64-randconfig-x012-201632 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
> reproduce:
>         git checkout 4e80c8f505741cbdef3e10862ea36057e8d85e7c
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=x86_64 
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

Patch was sent quite before this report has been generated.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/654916/


> 
>    drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-merrifield.c: In function
> 'mrfld_pin_dbg_show':
> > > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-merrifield.c:518:10: error: implicit
> > > declaration of function 'readl' [-Werror=implicit-function-
> > > declaration]
>      value = readl(bufcfg);
>              ^~~~~
>    drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-merrifield.c: In function
> 'mrfld_update_bufcfg':
> > > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-merrifield.c:575:2: error: implicit
> > > declaration of function 'writel' [-Werror=implicit-function-
> > > declaration]
>      writel(value, bufcfg);
>      ^~~~~~
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> vim +/readl +518 drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-merrifield.c
> 
>    512		if (!mrfld_buf_available(mp, pin)) {
>    513			seq_puts(s, "not available");
>    514			return;
>    515		}
>    516	
>    517		bufcfg = mrfld_get_bufcfg(mp, pin);
>  > 518		value = readl(bufcfg);
>    519	
>    520		mode = (value & BUFCFG_PINMODE_MASK) >>
> BUFCFG_PINMODE_SHIFT;
>    521		if (!mode)
>    522			seq_puts(s, "GPIO ");
>    523		else
>    524			seq_printf(s, "mode %d ", mode);
>    525	
>    526		seq_printf(s, "0x%08x", value);
>    527	}
>    528	
>    529	static const struct pinctrl_ops mrfld_pinctrl_ops = {
>    530		.get_groups_count = mrfld_get_groups_count,
>    531		.get_group_name = mrfld_get_group_name,
>    532		.get_group_pins = mrfld_get_group_pins,
>    533		.pin_dbg_show = mrfld_pin_dbg_show,
>    534	};
>    535	
>    536	static int mrfld_get_functions_count(struct pinctrl_dev
> *pctldev)
>    537	{
>    538		struct mrfld_pinctrl *mp =
> pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
>    539	
>    540		return mp->nfunctions;
>    541	}
>    542	
>    543	static const char *mrfld_get_function_name(struct
> pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>    544						   unsigned int
> function)
>    545	{
>    546		struct mrfld_pinctrl *mp =
> pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
>    547	
>    548		return mp->functions[function].name;
>    549	}
>    550	
>    551	static int mrfld_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev
> *pctldev,
>    552					     unsigned int
> function,
>    553					     const char * const
> **groups,
>    554					     unsigned int *
> const ngroups)
>    555	{
>    556		struct mrfld_pinctrl *mp =
> pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
>    557	
>    558		*groups = mp->functions[function].groups;
>    559		*ngroups = mp->functions[function].ngroups;
>    560		return 0;
>    561	}
>    562	
>    563	static void mrfld_update_bufcfg(struct mrfld_pinctrl
> *mp, unsigned int pin,
>    564					u32 bits, u32 mask)
>    565	{
>    566		void __iomem *bufcfg;
>    567		u32 value;
>    568	
>    569		bufcfg = mrfld_get_bufcfg(mp, pin);
>    570		value = readl(bufcfg);
>    571	
>    572		value &= ~mask;
>    573		value |= bits & mask;
>    574	
>  > 575		writel(value, bufcfg);
>    576	}
>    577	
>    578	static int mrfld_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev
> *pctldev,
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology
> Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel
> Corporation

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

      reply	other threads:[~2016-08-09 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-08  1:41 drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-merrifield.c:518:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'readl' kbuild test robot
2016-08-09 15:51 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1470757900.25395.10.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.