From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932368AbcHOWFQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:05:16 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:34965 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932184AbcHOWFO (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:05:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1471298700.13300.28.camel@decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 44/94] wext: Fix 32 bit iwpriv compatibility issue with 64 bit Kernel From: Ben Hutchings To: Johannes Berg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , Prasun Maiti , Ujjal Roy , Dibyajyoti Ghosh Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 23:05:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1471240271.16783.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1471240271.16783.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Enq3O8sW2EFvOGIyMIrO" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 109.148.166.21 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-Enq3O8sW2EFvOGIyMIrO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 07:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 17:42 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >=20 > > 3.2.82-rc1 review patch.=C2=A0=C2=A0If anyone has any objections, pleas= e let me > > know. > >=20 > > ------------------ > >=20 > > > > From: Prasun Maiti > >=20 > > commit 3d5fdff46c4b2b9534fa2f9fc78e90a48e0ff724 upstream. > >=20 >=20 > Did you just include this by accident? You had pointed out yourself > that this was broken if anything but iwpoint was transferred, and since > the Marvell people shouldn't be using wext anyway I reverted it > already. Yes, this was an accident and I'll drop it. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings This sentence contradicts itself - no actually it doesn't. --=-Enq3O8sW2EFvOGIyMIrO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJXsjyMAAoJEOe/yOyVhhEJk8gP/2TCWte4Enzzmriz/PWub3hr mn2A51WDymR4M+MR4sa2ZJnRy2LU6u1UGqWIT5zJ5NYtYlIzkq2pUloIuvCm/UmD l2IJeKheBeUR1/T4t1P2UOkvKnDZfnGDqOZ/g9r3W2uSWp9yT3HBNLNop1bxcnlD LWLN/5JBMP5XDrnAlmf9miNNr62vEEZZIemYRNjoss393fCgHHfJfjT+Xm+jKXs4 mzVrYKglkVDQD5XQHcovCwBtsSMJHYye9Jjaqsahpc3WCpbO4YsUwanarmFRbUbe Td0P9LO/cvqkJH2yI3Zkk54wWE7LqO+9b7wLOCv8PWLUJbJH9nb3udjF1DYRFu+S R8Cgsrl1O5Q9gn4/IGkfUZxRpgUgMoR6Zo6EGgYNeO0K6/TnsU823kiNo5nT+Ngu EfX35asw3LhSE5BzeMkizHPOUquRQPKG+jQM3bu/oDQU1PsVmoU9KcSe5NtsT4Vx GTOpnyjUD6t8si9cZY705NFKR5xV0bkfMUaQkxJLHkxUhyqIylhXNonuQro39CzV RaA8FSl291ZvT0G3OkJR2/MxRYa+CDo1vAISOX8oz6OkJPoqw75eajQOl//FmHJj rpDPqH8h2xvdywgoFEkoGFe8AWsNbvkfkgbE2R08du3auV82DpSNpwlWIaxLTlbr Ti9mu/1ZHYpjj+6F1H8H =BhM9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Enq3O8sW2EFvOGIyMIrO--