diff for duplicates of <1471355726.4197.6.camel@toradex.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 8f5444e..f1924bc 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 02:59 +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > > Changes in v4: > - simple-audio-card does still not allow for more advanced use cases -> like Tegra SoCs +> ? like Tegra SoCs > - further platform drivers have been accepted since my last attempt -> (e.g. rt5677 one) +> ? (e.g. rt5677 one) > - relevance for one further board the new Toradex Apalis TK1 > - drop unused sound/jack.h include > - in tegra_sgtl5000_driver_remove() pass return value of -> snd_soc_unregister_card() on to caller +> ? snd_soc_unregister_card() on to caller > - no longer set owner property in platform_driver to THIS_MODULE > - re-based/resend > @@ -22,29 +22,25 @@ On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 02:59 +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > - using simple-audio-card as suggested by Fabio > > Marcel Ziswiler (3): -> ASoC: tegra: add tegra sgtl5000 machine driver -> ARM: tegra: apalis/colibri t30: integrate audio -> ARM: tegra: enable sgtl5000 audio +> ? ASoC: tegra: add tegra sgtl5000 machine driver +> ? ARM: tegra: apalis/colibri t30: integrate audio +> ? ARM: tegra: enable sgtl5000 audio > -> .../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra-audio-sgtl5000.txt | 42 ++++ -> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis.dtsi | 49 +++++ -> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi | 49 +++++ -> arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 1 + -> sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig | 11 ++ -> sound/soc/tegra/Makefile | 2 + -> sound/soc/tegra/tegra_sgtl5000.c | 212 +> ?.../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra-audio-sgtl5000.txt |??42 ++++ +> ?arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis.dtsi??????????????|??49 +++++ +> ?arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi?????????????|??49 +++++ +> ?arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig???????????????????|???1 + +> ?sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig????????????????????????????|??11 ++ +> ?sound/soc/tegra/Makefile???????????????????????????|???2 + +> ?sound/soc/tegra/tegra_sgtl5000.c???????????????????| 212 > +++++++++++++++++++++ -> 7 files changed, 366 insertions(+) -> create mode 100644 +> ?7 files changed, 366 insertions(+) +> ?create mode 100644 > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra-audio- > sgtl5000.txt -> create mode 100644 sound/soc/tegra/tegra_sgtl5000.c +> ?create mode 100644 sound/soc/tegra/tegra_sgtl5000.c With Mark finally having pulled the first patch of this series (https:/ /lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/15/297) I'm wondering whether the second and third patch are now being pulled via tegra tree? Or should I rather re- submit those as a new v5 patch set? -_______________________________________________ -linux-arm-kernel mailing list -linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 3aa329e..10c2d4d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,25 +1,8 @@ "ref\01466298002-12576-1-git-send-email-marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com\0" - "From\0Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ASoC/ARM: tegra: apalis t30/tk1/colibri t30: sgtl5000 audio\0" + "From\0marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com (Marcel Ziswiler)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v4 0/3] ASoC/ARM: tegra: apalis t30/tk1/colibri t30: sgtl5000 audio\0" "Date\0Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:55:28 +0000\0" - "To\0linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>\0" - "Cc\0mark.rutland@arm.com <mark.rutland@arm.com>" - devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org> - alsa-devel@alsa-project.org <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org> - swarren@wwwdotorg.org <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - gnurou@gmail.com <gnurou@gmail.com> - lgirdwood@gmail.com <lgirdwood@gmail.com> - prarit@redhat.com <prarit@redhat.com> - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - robh+dt@kernel.org <robh+dt@kernel.org> - linux@armlinux.org.uk <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - broonie@kernel.org <broonie@kernel.org> - thierry.reding@gmail.com <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - tiwai@suse.com <tiwai@suse.com> - ttynkkynen@nvidia.com <ttynkkynen@nvidia.com> - akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - perex@perex.cz <perex@perex.cz> - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 02:59 +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:\n" @@ -28,13 +11,13 @@ "> \n" "> Changes in v4:\n" "> - simple-audio-card does still not allow for more advanced use cases\n" - "> \302\240 like Tegra SoCs\n" + "> ? like Tegra SoCs\n" "> - further platform drivers have been accepted since my last attempt\n" - "> \302\240 (e.g. rt5677 one)\n" + "> ? (e.g. rt5677 one)\n" "> - relevance for one further board the new Toradex Apalis TK1\n" "> - drop unused sound/jack.h include\n" "> - in tegra_sgtl5000_driver_remove() pass return value of\n" - "> \302\240 snd_soc_unregister_card() on to caller\n" + "> ? snd_soc_unregister_card() on to caller\n" "> - no longer set owner property in platform_driver to THIS_MODULE\n" "> - re-based/resend\n" "> \n" @@ -46,31 +29,27 @@ "> - using simple-audio-card as suggested by Fabio\n" "> \n" "> Marcel Ziswiler (3):\n" - "> \302\240 ASoC: tegra: add tegra sgtl5000 machine driver\n" - "> \302\240 ARM: tegra: apalis/colibri t30: integrate audio\n" - "> \302\240 ARM: tegra: enable sgtl5000 audio\n" + "> ? ASoC: tegra: add tegra sgtl5000 machine driver\n" + "> ? ARM: tegra: apalis/colibri t30: integrate audio\n" + "> ? ARM: tegra: enable sgtl5000 audio\n" "> \n" - "> \302\240.../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra-audio-sgtl5000.txt |\302\240\302\24042 ++++\n" - "> \302\240arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis.dtsi\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240|\302\240\302\24049 +++++\n" - "> \302\240arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240|\302\240\302\24049 +++++\n" - "> \302\240arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240|\302\240\302\240\302\2401 +\n" - "> \302\240sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240|\302\240\302\24011 ++\n" - "> \302\240sound/soc/tegra/Makefile\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240|\302\240\302\240\302\2402 +\n" - "> \302\240sound/soc/tegra/tegra_sgtl5000.c\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240| 212\n" + "> ?.../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra-audio-sgtl5000.txt |??42 ++++\n" + "> ?arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis.dtsi??????????????|??49 +++++\n" + "> ?arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi?????????????|??49 +++++\n" + "> ?arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig???????????????????|???1 +\n" + "> ?sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig????????????????????????????|??11 ++\n" + "> ?sound/soc/tegra/Makefile???????????????????????????|???2 +\n" + "> ?sound/soc/tegra/tegra_sgtl5000.c???????????????????| 212\n" "> +++++++++++++++++++++\n" - "> \302\2407 files changed, 366 insertions(+)\n" - "> \302\240create mode 100644\n" + "> ?7 files changed, 366 insertions(+)\n" + "> ?create mode 100644\n" "> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra-audio-\n" "> sgtl5000.txt\n" - "> \302\240create mode 100644 sound/soc/tegra/tegra_sgtl5000.c\n" + "> ?create mode 100644 sound/soc/tegra/tegra_sgtl5000.c\n" "\n" "With Mark finally having pulled the first patch of this series (https:/\n" "/lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/15/297) I'm wondering whether the second and\n" "third patch are now being pulled via tegra tree? Or should I rather re-\n" - "submit those as a new v5 patch set?\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" - "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel + submit those as a new v5 patch set? -9eac3277e7129e7c5f712c0ab14141869c19851749e26451190908813e40d669 +d5a9a4ddd6d2695014a0b3ca1cc1909cc44af93d339b77670fcea77051ed1dfb
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 8f5444e..1294b4b 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -44,7 +44,3 @@ With Mark finally having pulled the first patch of this series (https:/ /lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/15/297) I'm wondering whether the second and third patch are now being pulled via tegra tree? Or should I rather re- submit those as a new v5 patch set? -_______________________________________________ -linux-arm-kernel mailing list -linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 3aa329e..da5f43f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -3,23 +3,23 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ASoC/ARM: tegra: apalis t30/tk1/colibri t30: sgtl5000 audio\0" "Date\0Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:55:28 +0000\0" "To\0linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>\0" - "Cc\0mark.rutland@arm.com <mark.rutland@arm.com>" - devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org> - alsa-devel@alsa-project.org <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org> - swarren@wwwdotorg.org <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - gnurou@gmail.com <gnurou@gmail.com> - lgirdwood@gmail.com <lgirdwood@gmail.com> - prarit@redhat.com <prarit@redhat.com> - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>" robh+dt@kernel.org <robh+dt@kernel.org> + devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org> linux@armlinux.org.uk <linux@armlinux.org.uk> + gnurou@gmail.com <gnurou@gmail.com> broonie@kernel.org <broonie@kernel.org> thierry.reding@gmail.com <thierry.reding@gmail.com> + mark.rutland@arm.com <mark.rutland@arm.com> + prarit@redhat.com <prarit@redhat.com> + akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> tiwai@suse.com <tiwai@suse.com> + lgirdwood@gmail.com <lgirdwood@gmail.com> ttynkkynen@nvidia.com <ttynkkynen@nvidia.com> - akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> perex@perex.cz <perex@perex.cz> - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" + alsa-devel@alsa-project.org <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org> + " swarren@wwwdotorg.org <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 02:59 +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:\n" @@ -67,10 +67,6 @@ "With Mark finally having pulled the first patch of this series (https:/\n" "/lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/15/297) I'm wondering whether the second and\n" "third patch are now being pulled via tegra tree? Or should I rather re-\n" - "submit those as a new v5 patch set?\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" - "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel + submit those as a new v5 patch set? -9eac3277e7129e7c5f712c0ab14141869c19851749e26451190908813e40d669 +386028c29995ffc46037351799c5548f81e7bfea462b0ad03dff65e95f8b4071
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.