From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "gpio: intel-mid: Remove potentially harmful code" has been added to the 4.7-stable tree
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:30:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147150905574218@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
gpio: intel-mid: Remove potentially harmful code
to the 4.7-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
gpio-intel-mid-remove-potentially-harmful-code.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.7 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 3dbd3212f81b2b410a34a922055e2da792864829 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:50:12 +0300
Subject: gpio: intel-mid: Remove potentially harmful code
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
commit 3dbd3212f81b2b410a34a922055e2da792864829 upstream.
The commit d56d6b3d7d69 ("gpio: langwell: add Intel Merrifield support")
doesn't look at all as a proper support for Intel Merrifield and I dare to say
that it distorts the behaviour of the hardware.
The register map is different on Intel Merrifield, i.e. only 6 out of 8
register have the same purpose but none of them has same location in the
address space. The current case potentially harmful to existing hardware since
it's poking registers on wrong offsets and may set some pin to be GPIO output
when connected hardware doesn't expect such.
Besides the above GPIO and pinctrl on Intel Merrifield have been located in
different IP blocks. The functionality has been extended as well, i.e. added
support of level interrupts, special registers for wake capable sources and
thus, in my opinion, requires a completele separate driver.
If someone wondering the existing gpio-intel-mid.c would be converted to actual
pinctrl (which by the fact it is now), though I wouldn't be a volunteer to do
that.
Fixes: d56d6b3d7d69 ("gpio: langwell: add Intel Merrifield support")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c | 19 -------------------
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
* Moorestown platform Langwell chip.
* Medfield platform Penwell chip.
* Clovertrail platform Cloverview chip.
- * Merrifield platform Tangier chip.
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -64,10 +63,6 @@ enum GPIO_REG {
/* intel_mid gpio driver data */
struct intel_mid_gpio_ddata {
u16 ngpio; /* number of gpio pins */
- u32 gplr_offset; /* offset of first GPLR register from base */
- u32 flis_base; /* base address of FLIS registers */
- u32 flis_len; /* length of FLIS registers */
- u32 (*get_flis_offset)(int gpio);
u32 chip_irq_type; /* chip interrupt type */
};
@@ -252,15 +247,6 @@ static const struct intel_mid_gpio_ddata
.chip_irq_type = INTEL_MID_IRQ_TYPE_EDGE,
};
-static const struct intel_mid_gpio_ddata gpio_tangier = {
- .ngpio = 192,
- .gplr_offset = 4,
- .flis_base = 0xff0c0000,
- .flis_len = 0x8000,
- .get_flis_offset = NULL,
- .chip_irq_type = INTEL_MID_IRQ_TYPE_EDGE,
-};
-
static const struct pci_device_id intel_gpio_ids[] = {
{
/* Lincroft */
@@ -287,11 +273,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_
PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x08f7),
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&gpio_cloverview_core,
},
- {
- /* Tangier */
- PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1199),
- .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&gpio_tangier,
- },
{ 0 }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, intel_gpio_ids);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com are
queue-4.7/gpio-intel-mid-remove-potentially-harmful-code.patch
queue-4.7/gpio-intel-mid-switch-to-devm_gpiochip_add_data.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147150905574218@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.