From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jlayton@redhat.com, alexey.kodanev@oracle.com,
bfields@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "nfsd: don't return an unhashed lock stateid after taking mutex" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:58:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471514304185143@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
nfsd: don't return an unhashed lock stateid after taking mutex
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
nfsd-don-t-return-an-unhashed-lock-stateid-after-taking-mutex.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From dd257933fa4b9fea66a1195f8a15111029810abc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:37:39 -0400
Subject: nfsd: don't return an unhashed lock stateid after taking mutex
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
commit dd257933fa4b9fea66a1195f8a15111029810abc upstream.
nfsd4_lock will take the st_mutex before working with the stateid it
gets, but between the time when we drop the cl_lock and take the mutex,
the stateid could become unhashed (a'la FREE_STATEID). If that happens
the lock stateid returned to the client will be forgotten.
Fix this by first moving the st_mutex acquisition into
lookup_or_create_lock_state. Then, have it check to see if the lock
stateid is still hashed after taking the mutex. If it's not, then put
the stateid and try the find/create again.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Alexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -5502,7 +5502,7 @@ static __be32
lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
struct nfs4_ol_stateid *ost,
struct nfsd4_lock *lock,
- struct nfs4_ol_stateid **lst, bool *new)
+ struct nfs4_ol_stateid **plst, bool *new)
{
__be32 status;
struct nfs4_file *fi = ost->st_stid.sc_file;
@@ -5510,7 +5510,9 @@ lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4
struct nfs4_client *cl = oo->oo_owner.so_client;
struct inode *inode = d_inode(cstate->current_fh.fh_dentry);
struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
+ struct nfs4_ol_stateid *lst;
unsigned int strhashval;
+ bool hashed;
lo = find_lockowner_str(cl, &lock->lk_new_owner);
if (!lo) {
@@ -5526,12 +5528,27 @@ lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4
goto out;
}
- *lst = find_or_create_lock_stateid(lo, fi, inode, ost, new);
- if (*lst == NULL) {
+retry:
+ lst = find_or_create_lock_stateid(lo, fi, inode, ost, new);
+ if (lst == NULL) {
status = nfserr_jukebox;
goto out;
}
+
+ mutex_lock(&lst->st_mutex);
+
+ /* See if it's still hashed to avoid race with FREE_STATEID */
+ spin_lock(&cl->cl_lock);
+ hashed = !list_empty(&lst->st_perfile);
+ spin_unlock(&cl->cl_lock);
+
+ if (!hashed) {
+ mutex_unlock(&lst->st_mutex);
+ nfs4_put_stid(&lst->st_stid);
+ goto retry;
+ }
status = nfs_ok;
+ *plst = lst;
out:
nfs4_put_stateowner(&lo->lo_owner);
return status;
@@ -5598,8 +5615,6 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struc
goto out;
status = lookup_or_create_lock_state(cstate, open_stp, lock,
&lock_stp, &new);
- if (status == nfs_ok)
- mutex_lock(&lock_stp->st_mutex);
} else {
status = nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op(cstate,
lock->lk_old_lock_seqid,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jlayton@redhat.com are
queue-4.4/nfsd-fix-race-between-free_stateid-and-lock.patch
queue-4.4/nfsd-don-t-return-an-unhashed-lock-stateid-after-taking-mutex.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471514304185143@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexey.kodanev@oracle.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.