From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Josh Max <JMax@mail.greenriver.edu>, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: allow selecting the interpreter based on xattr keywords
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 12:15:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472141735.3489.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471838494-29672-1-git-send-email-JMax@mail.greenriver.edu>
On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 21:01 -0700, Josh Max wrote:
> This patch allows binfmt_misc to select the interpeter for arbitrary
> binaries by comparing a specified registered keyword with the value
> of a specified binary's extended attribute (user.binfmt.interp),
> and then launching the program with the registered interpreter.
>
> This is useful when wanting to launch a collection of binaries under
> the same interpreter, even when they do not necessarily share a
> common extension or magic bits, or when their magic conflics with the
> operation of binfmt_elf. Some examples of its use would be to launch
> some executables of various different architectures in a directory,
> or for running some native binaries under a sandbox (like firejail)
> automatically during their launch.
Could you expand on the use cases? The patch set looks OK; the issue
with extended attributes is lack of universal support on filesystems,
but that may not be a problem because they're definitely supported on
all the standard ones. I think the current F flag solves the foreign
binary in chroot or container. Self sandboxing sounds reasonable, but
if this is a security feature, doesn't having the label under the user.
EAs mean that the confined binary can simply remove the label and
unconfine itself?
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-25 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-22 4:01 [PATCH] binfmt_misc: allow selecting the interpreter based on xattr keywords Josh Max
2016-08-25 16:15 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-08-26 8:00 ` Josh Max
2016-08-26 14:55 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-26 17:59 ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-08-26 21:38 ` James Bottomley
2016-11-11 10:31 ` Alex Bennée
2016-08-26 21:12 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-08-26 21:26 ` James Bottomley
2016-08-27 11:52 ` One Thousand Gnomes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1472141735.3489.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=JMax@mail.greenriver.edu \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.