From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A15605B3 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u7PLqbZp024673; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:52:37 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id X-OEYvABH--Q; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:52:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u7PLqZwM024668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:52:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1472161955.29583.1.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Robert Yang , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:52:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6ee635df-666d-90bb-b296-7aa76714cbcc@windriver.com> References: <1471943106.16712.101.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <180a3a72-1b44-dafa-77e7-1905f9374947@windriver.com> <6ee635df-666d-90bb-b296-7aa76714cbcc@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/11] runqemu: refactor it and remove machine knowledge X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:52:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Robert, On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 22:36 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > I've fixed the problem and will send a V5. I have tried to test it on > my > autobuilder, but it's running out of disk space last tonight. It is > still in > building today, and didn't see any problems by now, I will reply if I > see. We're getting closer, there was just one issue I noticed in the last test run: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-arm64/builds /536/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio > > > and: > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-oe-sel > > > ftest/builds/652/steps/Running%20oe-selftest/logs/stdio > > > > > > > > > I'm also not sure what caused these, whether it was this patchset > > > or > > > not: > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-arm/bu > > > ilds/927/steps/Running%20ESDK%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-mips/b > > > uilds/901/steps/Running%20ESDK%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-ppc/bu > > > ilds/914/steps/Running%20ESDK%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-x86/bu > > > ilds/914/steps/Running%20ESDK%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-x86-64 > > > /builds/935 > > > > I'm not sure either, need more investigations. > > I think that this isn't caused by runqemu patches since the error > doesn't > seem like relate to runqemu, and I can't reproduce it. I think we can blame one of Ross' patches for this one! Cheers, Richard