From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
mpa@pengutronix.de, irina.tirdea@intel.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: bmc150: reset chip at init time
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:45:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472586343.5025.1.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16ba4f3e-50fa-cadf-da57-39522b6ce386@kernel.org>
On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 18:23 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 25/08/16 17:45, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> > In at least one known setup, the chip comes up in a state where
> > reading
> > the chip ID returns garbage unless it's been reset, due to noise on
> > the
> > wires during system boot.
> >
> > All supported chips have the same reset method, and based on the
> > datasheets they all need 1.3 or 1.8ms to recover after reset. So,
> > do
> > the conservative thing here and always reset the chip.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Reviewed-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Srinivas, it's your driver. Can you take a quick look at this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c
> > b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c
> > index bf17aae..59b380d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
> > #define BMC150_ACCEL_REG_PMU_BW 0x10
> > #define BMC150_ACCEL_DEF_BW 125
> >
> > +#define BMC150_ACCEL_REG_RESET 0x14
> > +#define BMC150_ACCEL_RESET_VAL 0xB6
> > +
> > #define BMC150_ACCEL_REG_INT_MAP_0 0x19
> > #define BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MAP_0_BIT_SLOPE BIT(2)
> >
> > @@ -1497,6 +1500,14 @@ static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct
> > bmc150_accel_data *data)
> > int ret, i;
> > unsigned int val;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Reset chip to get it in a known good state. A delay of
> > 1.8ms after
> > + * reset is required according to the data sheets of
> > supported chips.
> > + */
> > + regmap_write(data->regmap, BMC150_ACCEL_REG_RESET,
> > + BMC150_ACCEL_RESET_VAL);
> > + usleep_range(1800, 2500);
> > +
> > ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, BMC150_ACCEL_REG_CHIP_ID,
> > &val);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > dev_err(dev, "Error: Reading chip id\n");
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-30 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-25 16:45 [PATCH] iio: accel: bmc150: reset chip at init time Olof Johansson
2016-08-29 17:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-30 19:45 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2016-09-03 16:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1472586343.5025.1.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irina.tirdea@intel.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.