All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <nicholas.piggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix a race between rwsem and the scheduler
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 07:47:10 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472680030.2388.95.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160831133104.GD10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 15:31 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:28:18AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On powerpc we have a sync deep in _switch to achieve that.
> 
> OK, for giggles, could you (or Balbir) check what happens if you take
> that sync out?
> 
> There should be enough serialization in the generic code to cover the
> case that code mentions.
> 
> ARM64 has a stronger barrier in its context switch code, but that's
> because they need to sync against external agents (like their TLB and
> cache) and no amount of generic locking is going to cover that.

The problem is no amount of testing can tell you it works for sure :-)

I would be nervous not having a real full sync in _switch. All we have
along the scheduler path is lwsync's and our isync based load construct
for spin_lock, I'm not sure what other assumptions we have around that
sync in there...

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-31 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-30  8:49 [RFC][PATCH] Fix a race between rwsem and the scheduler Balbir Singh
2016-08-30  9:13 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-30 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-30 13:04   ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-30 14:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-30 16:57       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-30 18:34         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-30 21:28           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-08-31  7:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31 10:56               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-08-31 13:31             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31 21:47               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2016-09-01  6:49                 ` Balbir Singh
2016-09-01  6:57                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-01 14:17                   ` Boqun Feng
2016-09-01 15:33                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-30 21:25     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-08-31  7:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31 10:55         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-08-31  3:41   ` Balbir Singh
2016-08-31  7:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-31 10:17       ` Balbir Singh
2016-08-31 10:57       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-09-01  1:48       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-09-01 12:16         ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-08-30 12:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-31  3:25   ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1472680030.2388.95.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicholas.piggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.