diff for duplicates of <1472830862.6758.7.camel@perches.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 68f8844..f268942 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:41 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > changing to use bool avoids potential errors and > > promotes consistency. > > Other uses of this function already use true/false. -> In the patch description you refer to loss of precision. However, your -> patch does not address any loss of precision issues. So I think that the +> In the patch description you refer to loss of precision. However, your� +> patch does not address any loss of precision issues. So I think that the� > patch description is misleading and could be made more clear. I tend towards terse being better than verbose. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 2101efd..10a6e14 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ "> > changing to use bool avoids potential errors and\n" "> > promotes consistency.\n" "> > Other uses of this function already use true/false.\n" - "> In the patch description you refer to loss of precision. However, your\302\240\n" - "> patch does not address any loss of precision issues. So I think that the\302\240\n" + "> In the patch description you refer to loss of precision. However, your\303\257\302\277\302\275\n" + "> patch does not address any loss of precision issues. So I think that the\303\257\302\277\302\275\n" "> patch description is misleading and could be made more clear.\n" "\n" "I tend towards terse being better than verbose.\n" @@ -46,4 +46,4 @@ "\n" What would you suggest? -69d17a7d606642ccbe3c09216ec3fd67c5dc97ef5b7e9dd96844c6eebb8bb72e +371912016a698246fa7cf725235ed594bac67e455bd14817fc0135ec382c13f5
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.