From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: briannorris@chromium.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jic23@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "iio: fix sched WARNING "do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING"" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 15:36:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147308259799204@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
iio: fix sched WARNING "do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING"
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
iio-fix-sched-warning-do-not-call-blocking-ops-when-task_running.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From fcf68f3c0bb2a541aa47a2a38b8939edf84fd529 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:19:38 -0700
Subject: iio: fix sched WARNING "do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING"
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
commit fcf68f3c0bb2a541aa47a2a38b8939edf84fd529 upstream.
When using CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, the scheduler nicely points out
that we're calling sleeping primitives within the wait_event loop, which
means we might clobber the task state:
[ 10.831289] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<ffffffc00026b610>]
[ 10.845531] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 10.850161] WARNING: at kernel/sched/core.c:7630
...
[ 12.164333] ---[ end trace 45409966a9a76438 ]---
[ 12.168942] Call trace:
[ 12.171391] [<ffffffc00024ed44>] __might_sleep+0x64/0x90
[ 12.176699] [<ffffffc000954774>] mutex_lock_nested+0x50/0x3fc
[ 12.182440] [<ffffffc0007b9424>] iio_kfifo_buf_data_available+0x28/0x4c
[ 12.189043] [<ffffffc0007b76ac>] iio_buffer_ready+0x60/0xe0
[ 12.194608] [<ffffffc0007b7834>] iio_buffer_read_first_n_outer+0x108/0x1a8
[ 12.201474] [<ffffffc000370d48>] __vfs_read+0x58/0x114
[ 12.206606] [<ffffffc000371740>] vfs_read+0x94/0x118
[ 12.211564] [<ffffffc0003720f8>] SyS_read+0x64/0xb4
[ 12.216436] [<ffffffc000203cb4>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
To avoid this, we should (a la https://lwn.net/Articles/628628/) use the
wait_woken() function, which avoids the nested sleeping while still
handling races between waiting / wake-events.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ ssize_t iio_buffer_read_first_n_outer(st
{
struct iio_dev *indio_dev = filp->private_data;
struct iio_buffer *rb = indio_dev->buffer;
+ DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
size_t datum_size;
size_t to_wait;
int ret;
@@ -131,19 +132,29 @@ ssize_t iio_buffer_read_first_n_outer(st
else
to_wait = min_t(size_t, n / datum_size, rb->watermark);
+ add_wait_queue(&rb->pollq, &wait);
do {
- ret = wait_event_interruptible(rb->pollq,
- iio_buffer_ready(indio_dev, rb, to_wait, n / datum_size));
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- if (!indio_dev->info)
- return -ENODEV;
+ if (!indio_dev->info) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (!iio_buffer_ready(indio_dev, rb, to_wait, n / datum_size)) {
+ if (signal_pending(current)) {
+ ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
+ MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ continue;
+ }
ret = rb->access->read_first_n(rb, n, buf);
if (ret == 0 && (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
ret = -EAGAIN;
} while (ret == 0);
+ remove_wait_queue(&rb->pollq, &wait);
return ret;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from briannorris@chromium.org are
queue-4.4/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel-fix-usage-of-cros_ec_cmd_xfer.patch
queue-4.4/iio-fix-sched-warning-do-not-call-blocking-ops-when-task_running.patch
queue-4.4/mfd-cros_ec-add-cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status-helper.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-09-05 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147308259799204@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.