From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0547977532 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u86DI8Qj025601; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 14:19:23 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AGA7OxypvYdi; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 14:19:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u86DJHj8025890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 6 Sep 2016 14:19:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1473167957.20226.44.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Nicolas Dechesne , bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 14:19:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1473162780-11643-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org> References: <1473162780-11643-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/bb/build: create .old symlink for run.do_xx and log.do_xx X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:19:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 12:53 +0100, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > When they exist, keep a reference to the 'previous' (or old) build > for run.do_xx > and log.do_xx files, which can be useful when debugging. The symlink > are created > as run.do_xx.old and log.do_xx.old. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dechesne > --- >  lib/bb/build.py | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) We keep the old logfiles around and "ls -t" is comparatively straight forward. Do we really need this extra complexity? Cheers, Richard