From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhsP7-0006tZ-2r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 02:01:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhsP1-0004j2-94 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 02:01:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhsP1-0004ix-3x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 02:01:35 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F76FC04D2BD for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1473314491.6698.5.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 08:01:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160904222039.11460-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> References: <20160904222039.11460-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/18] virgl: use a seperate rendering thread List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, airlied@redhat.com Hi, > The benchmarks are quite encouraging, since I get from +-25% for > xonotic up to +-100% for glmark. (fwiw, vhost-user-gpu had similar > results too). Finally, I tried to make it acceptable for upstream. Hmm, I don't feel like adding too many modes to virgl ... With vhost-user-gpu giving us simliar benefits I'd prefer to focus on that, for the additional security benefits (sandboxing the separate process). cheers, Gerd