From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
wharms@bfs.de
Cc: dan.carpenter@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] intel-mid: Add valid error messages on init failure
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 11:27:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473420465.11323.126.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b3987cc6560a1171809103e87e700d68c9a6b65.1473386382.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 19:07 -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Added valid error/warning messages to platform data
> initalization failures in SFI device libs code.
Looks good to me after addressing the following comments.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-
> mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-
> mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c
> index c259fb6..bd776b04 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c
> @@ -15,17 +15,27 @@
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <asm/intel-mid.h>
>
> +#define EMC1403_THERMAL_INT "thermal_int"
> +#define EMC1403_THERMAL_ALERT_INT "thermal_alert"
I would be cosistent, i.e.
EMC1403_INT1 "..."
EMC1403_INT2 "..."
> +
> static void __init *emc1403_platform_data(void *info)
> {
> static short intr2nd_pdata;
> struct i2c_board_info *i2c_info = info;
> - int intr = get_gpio_by_name("thermal_int");
> - int intr2nd = get_gpio_by_name("thermal_alert");
> + int intr = get_gpio_by_name(EMC1403_THERMAL_INT);
> + int intr2nd = get_gpio_by_name(EMC1403_THERMAL_ALERT_INT);
>
> - if (intr < 0)
> + if (intr < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: Can't find %s GPIO interrupt\n",
> __func__,
> + EMC1403_THERMAL_INT);
> return NULL;
Souldn't we return an error here?
> - if (intr2nd < 0)
> + }
> +
> + if (intr2nd < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: Can't find %s GPIO interrupt\n",
> __func__,
> + EMC1403_THERMAL_ALERT_INT);
> return NULL;
Ditto.
Would you check _all_ files under device libs?
> + }
>
> i2c_info->irq = intr + INTEL_MID_IRQ_OFFSET;
> intr2nd_pdata = intr2nd + INTEL_MID_IRQ_OFFSET;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_ipc.c
> b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_ipc.c
> index a84b73d..6704694 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_ipc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_ipc.c
> @@ -42,8 +42,11 @@ void __init ipc_device_handler(struct
> sfi_device_table_entry *pentry,
> * On Medfield the platform device creation is handled by the
> MSIC
> * MFD driver so we don't need to do it here.
> */
> - if (intel_mid_has_msic())
> + if (intel_mid_has_msic()) {
> + pr_err("%s: device %s will be handled by MSIC mfd
> driver\n",
Remove "mfd" word.
> + __func__, pentry->name);
> return;
> + }
>
> pdev = platform_device_alloc(pentry->name, 0);
> if (pdev = NULL) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_lis331.c
> b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_lis331.c
> index 8be5d40..393c23e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_lis331.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_lis331.c
> @@ -14,17 +14,27 @@
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <asm/intel-mid.h>
>
> +#define LIS331DL_ACCEL_INT1 "accel_int"
> +#define LIS331DL_ACCEL_INT2 "accel_2"
LIS331DL_INT1
LIS331DL_INT2
> @@ -48,8 +48,12 @@ static void __init *max7315_platform_data(void
> *info)
> gpio_base = get_gpio_by_name(base_pin_name);
> intr = get_gpio_by_name(intr_pin_name);
>
> - if (gpio_base < 0)
> + if (gpio_base < 0) {
> + pr_warn("%s: falling back to dynamic gpio
> allocation\n",
> + __func__);
> return NULL;
Depends on my comment to the previous series.
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_mpu3050.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_mpu3050.c
> @@ -14,13 +14,18 @@
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <asm/intel-mid.h>
>
> +#define MPU3050_INT "mpu3050_int"
MPU3050_INT1
> mid/device_libs/platform_pcal9555a.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-
> mid/device_libs/platform_pcal9555a.c
> index 563f77f..cde764e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_pcal9555a.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_pcal9555a.c
> @@ -41,8 +41,11 @@ static void __init *pcal9555a_platform_data(void
> *info)
> intr = get_gpio_by_name(intr_pin_name);
>
> /* Check if the SFI record valid */
> - if (gpio_base = -1)
> + if (gpio_base = -1) {
> + pr_warn("%s: falling back to dynamic gpio
> allocation\n",
> + __func__);
> return NULL;
Same as above
> mid/device_libs/platform_tca6416.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-
> mid/device_libs/platform_tca6416.c
> index 4f41372..4d4393e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_tca6416.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_tca6416.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,12 @@ static void *tca6416_platform_data(void *info)
> gpio_base = get_gpio_by_name(base_pin_name);
> intr = get_gpio_by_name(intr_pin_name);
>
> - if (gpio_base < 0)
> + if (gpio_base < 0) {
> + pr_warn("%s: falling back to dynamic gpio
> allocation\n",
> + __func__);
> return NULL;
Same as above
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
wharms@bfs.de
Cc: dan.carpenter@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] intel-mid: Add valid error messages on init failure
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 14:27:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473420465.11323.126.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b3987cc6560a1171809103e87e700d68c9a6b65.1473386382.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 19:07 -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Added valid error/warning messages to platform data
> initalization failures in SFI device libs code.
Looks good to me after addressing the following comments.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-
> mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-
> mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c
> index c259fb6..bd776b04 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c
> @@ -15,17 +15,27 @@
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <asm/intel-mid.h>
>
> +#define EMC1403_THERMAL_INT "thermal_int"
> +#define EMC1403_THERMAL_ALERT_INT "thermal_alert"
I would be cosistent, i.e.
EMC1403_INT1 "..."
EMC1403_INT2 "..."
> +
> static void __init *emc1403_platform_data(void *info)
> {
> static short intr2nd_pdata;
> struct i2c_board_info *i2c_info = info;
> - int intr = get_gpio_by_name("thermal_int");
> - int intr2nd = get_gpio_by_name("thermal_alert");
> + int intr = get_gpio_by_name(EMC1403_THERMAL_INT);
> + int intr2nd = get_gpio_by_name(EMC1403_THERMAL_ALERT_INT);
>
> - if (intr < 0)
> + if (intr < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: Can't find %s GPIO interrupt\n",
> __func__,
> + EMC1403_THERMAL_INT);
> return NULL;
Souldn't we return an error here?
> - if (intr2nd < 0)
> + }
> +
> + if (intr2nd < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: Can't find %s GPIO interrupt\n",
> __func__,
> + EMC1403_THERMAL_ALERT_INT);
> return NULL;
Ditto.
Would you check _all_ files under device libs?
> + }
>
> i2c_info->irq = intr + INTEL_MID_IRQ_OFFSET;
> intr2nd_pdata = intr2nd + INTEL_MID_IRQ_OFFSET;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_ipc.c
> b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_ipc.c
> index a84b73d..6704694 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_ipc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_ipc.c
> @@ -42,8 +42,11 @@ void __init ipc_device_handler(struct
> sfi_device_table_entry *pentry,
> * On Medfield the platform device creation is handled by the
> MSIC
> * MFD driver so we don't need to do it here.
> */
> - if (intel_mid_has_msic())
> + if (intel_mid_has_msic()) {
> + pr_err("%s: device %s will be handled by MSIC mfd
> driver\n",
Remove "mfd" word.
> + __func__, pentry->name);
> return;
> + }
>
> pdev = platform_device_alloc(pentry->name, 0);
> if (pdev == NULL) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_lis331.c
> b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_lis331.c
> index 8be5d40..393c23e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_lis331.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_lis331.c
> @@ -14,17 +14,27 @@
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <asm/intel-mid.h>
>
> +#define LIS331DL_ACCEL_INT1 "accel_int"
> +#define LIS331DL_ACCEL_INT2 "accel_2"
LIS331DL_INT1
LIS331DL_INT2
> @@ -48,8 +48,12 @@ static void __init *max7315_platform_data(void
> *info)
> gpio_base = get_gpio_by_name(base_pin_name);
> intr = get_gpio_by_name(intr_pin_name);
>
> - if (gpio_base < 0)
> + if (gpio_base < 0) {
> + pr_warn("%s: falling back to dynamic gpio
> allocation\n",
> + __func__);
> return NULL;
Depends on my comment to the previous series.
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_mpu3050.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_mpu3050.c
> @@ -14,13 +14,18 @@
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <asm/intel-mid.h>
>
> +#define MPU3050_INT "mpu3050_int"
MPU3050_INT1
> mid/device_libs/platform_pcal9555a.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-
> mid/device_libs/platform_pcal9555a.c
> index 563f77f..cde764e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_pcal9555a.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_pcal9555a.c
> @@ -41,8 +41,11 @@ static void __init *pcal9555a_platform_data(void
> *info)
> intr = get_gpio_by_name(intr_pin_name);
>
> /* Check if the SFI record valid */
> - if (gpio_base == -1)
> + if (gpio_base == -1) {
> + pr_warn("%s: falling back to dynamic gpio
> allocation\n",
> + __func__);
> return NULL;
Same as above
> mid/device_libs/platform_tca6416.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-
> mid/device_libs/platform_tca6416.c
> index 4f41372..4d4393e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_tca6416.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_tca6416.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,12 @@ static void *tca6416_platform_data(void *info)
> gpio_base = get_gpio_by_name(base_pin_name);
> intr = get_gpio_by_name(intr_pin_name);
>
> - if (gpio_base < 0)
> + if (gpio_base < 0) {
> + pr_warn("%s: falling back to dynamic gpio
> allocation\n",
> + __func__);
> return NULL;
Same as above
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 19:23 [bug report] x86/sfi: Enable enumeration of SD devices Dan Carpenter
2016-08-09 15:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-08-09 17:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-08-28 13:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-08-29 20:59 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2016-08-30 9:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-08-30 11:06 ` walter harms
2016-08-30 11:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-08-30 18:18 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2016-09-07 1:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] intel-mid: Fix sfi get_platform_data() return value issues Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-07 1:04 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-07 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-07 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-08 0:04 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2016-09-08 0:04 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2016-09-08 9:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-08 9:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-08 0:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-08 0:05 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-08 12:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-08 12:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-08 22:41 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2016-09-08 22:41 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2016-09-09 11:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-09 11:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-09 2:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-09 2:07 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-09 2:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] intel-mid: Add valid error messages on init failure Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-09 2:07 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-09 11:27 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2016-09-09 11:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-09 2:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] intel-mid: Move boundry check to the start of init code Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-09 2:07 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2016-09-09 11:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-09 11:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-01 13:17 ` [bug report] x86/sfi: Enable enumeration of SD devices Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-07 0:51 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2016-09-07 12:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473420465.11323.126.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wharms@bfs.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.