From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: john.stultz@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "timekeeping: Avoid taking lock in NMI path with CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 18:06:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147343721866111@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
timekeeping: Avoid taking lock in NMI path with CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
timekeeping-avoid-taking-lock-in-nmi-path-with-config_debug_timekeeping.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 27727df240c7cc84f2ba6047c6f18d5addfd25ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:08:21 -0700
Subject: timekeeping: Avoid taking lock in NMI path with CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
commit 27727df240c7cc84f2ba6047c6f18d5addfd25ef upstream.
When I added some extra sanity checking in timekeeping_get_ns() under
CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING, I missed that the NMI safe __ktime_get_fast_ns()
method was using timekeeping_get_ns().
Thus the locking added to the debug checks broke the NMI-safety of
__ktime_get_fast_ns().
This patch open-codes the timekeeping_get_ns() logic for
__ktime_get_fast_ns(), so can avoid any deadlocks in NMI.
Fixes: 4ca22c2648f9 "timekeeping: Add warnings when overflows or underflows are observed"
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471993702-29148-2-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -383,7 +383,10 @@ static __always_inline u64 __ktime_get_f
do {
seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&tkf->seq);
tkr = tkf->base + (seq & 0x01);
- now = ktime_to_ns(tkr->base) + timekeeping_get_ns(tkr);
+ now = ktime_to_ns(tkr->base);
+
+ now += clocksource_delta(tkr->read(tkr->clock),
+ tkr->cycle_last, tkr->mask);
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&tkf->seq, seq));
return now;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from john.stultz@linaro.org are
queue-4.4/0110-ntp-Fix-ADJ_SETOFFSET-being-used-w-ADJ_NANO.patch
queue-4.4/timekeeping-avoid-taking-lock-in-nmi-path-with-config_debug_timekeeping.patch
queue-4.4/0109-time-Verify-time-values-in-adjtimex-ADJ_SETOFFSET-to.patch
queue-4.4/0118-clocksource-Allow-unregistering-the-watchdog.patch
queue-4.4/timekeeping-cap-array-access-in-timekeeping_debug.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147343721866111@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.