All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wb-buf-throttle feedback
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 15:25:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473587720.8183.5.camel@researchut.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09938f88-2a74-cb95-4498-5fc883eba115@kernel.dk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hello Jens,


On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 14:19 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > What drive is hosting the system and kernel build? I think the current
> > branch isn't aggressive enough on SATA style QD=32 devices with write
> > back caching, so if that's what you are running, it'd be great if you
> > could try a patch or two so we can improve this situation for you.
> >
> > The v4.7 branch is outdated. Let me spin a new one, that's probably the
> > best way to start.
> 

The drive is:

Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133
SControl 300)
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: ata1.00: ATA-9: HGST HTS725050A7E630, GH2OA910,
max UDMA/133
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: ata1.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ
(depth 31/32), AA
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access     ATA      HGST
HTS725050A7 A910 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976773168 512-byte logical
blocks: (500 GB/466 GiB)
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 4096-byte physical blocks
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read
cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: usb 1-4: new full-speed USB device number 2
using xhci_hcd
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel:  sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 < sda5 >
Sep 10 18:19:32 chutzpah kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk


> The 4.7 branch has now been updated, it's fully uptodate with the
> current 4.8 based branch. Would be great if you could try that. If you
> still see slowdowns, try and change RWB_DEF_DEPTH. It's currently at 16,
> scale it down to 4 or something like that.


I pulled in your changes from the axboe/wb-buf-throttle-v4.7 branch.

I can confirm now that, with these changes, the machine is very well responsive.
I tried both, the kernel build and the dd tests. Both of them worked fine.

Thank you very much.

Ritesh

- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=mW9B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

      reply	other threads:[~2016-09-11  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-09 19:00 wb-buf-throttle feedback Ritesh Raj Sarraf
2016-09-09 20:02 ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-09 20:19   ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-11  9:55     ` Ritesh Raj Sarraf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1473587720.8183.5.camel@researchut.com \
    --to=rrs@researchut.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.