From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: vincent.stehle@intel.com, artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, richard@nod.at
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ubifs: Fix assertion in layout_in_gaps()" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:21:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473686508147148@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ubifs: Fix assertion in layout_in_gaps()
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ubifs-fix-assertion-in-layout_in_gaps.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From c0082e985fdf77b02fc9e0dac3b58504dcf11b7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Vincent=20Stehl=C3=A9?= <vincent.stehle@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:26:30 +0200
Subject: ubifs: Fix assertion in layout_in_gaps()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@intel.com>
commit c0082e985fdf77b02fc9e0dac3b58504dcf11b7a upstream.
An assertion in layout_in_gaps() verifies that the gap_lebs pointer is
below the maximum bound. When computing this maximum bound the idx_lebs
count is multiplied by sizeof(int), while C pointers arithmetic does take
into account the size of the pointed elements implicitly already. Remove
the multiplication to fix the assertion.
Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac05a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@intel.com>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ubifs/tnc_commit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ubifs/tnc_commit.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/tnc_commit.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static int layout_in_gaps(struct ubifs_i
p = c->gap_lebs;
do {
- ubifs_assert(p < c->gap_lebs + sizeof(int) * c->lst.idx_lebs);
+ ubifs_assert(p < c->gap_lebs + c->lst.idx_lebs);
written = layout_leb_in_gaps(c, p);
if (written < 0) {
err = written;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vincent.stehle@intel.com are
queue-4.4/ubifs-fix-assertion-in-layout_in_gaps.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-09-12 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473686508147148@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.stehle@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.