All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Only expand COND once in wait_for()
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:53:32 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473879212.2435.115.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473855033-26980-1-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com>

Em Qua, 2016-09-14 às 13:10 +0100, Dave Gordon escreveu:
> Commentary from Chris Wilson's original version:
> 
> > 
> > I was looking at some wait_for() timeouts on a slow system, with
> > lots of
> > debug enabled (KASAN, lockdep, mmio_debug). Thinking that we were
> > mishandling the timeout, I tried to ensure that we loop at least
> > once
> > after first testing COND. However, the double test of COND either
> > side
> > of the timeout check makes that unlikely. But we can do an
> > equivalent
> > loop, that keeps the COND check after testing for timeout (required
> > so
> > that we are not preempted between testing COND and then testing for
> > a
> > timeout) without expanding COND twice.
> > 
> > The advantage of only expanding COND once is a dramatic reduction
> > in
> > code size:
> > 
> >    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex
> >    1308733	   5184	   1152	1315069	 141
> > 0fd	before
> >    1305341	   5184	   1152	1311677	 140
> > 3bd	after
> 
> but it turned out that due to a missing iniitialiser, gcc had "gone
> wild trimming undefined code" :( This version acheives a rather more
> modest (but still worthwhile) gain of ~550 bytes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
> Original-idea-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Zanoni, Paulo R <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index abe7a4d..8fd16ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -52,11 +52,15 @@
>   */
>  #define _wait_for(COND, US, W) ({ \
>  	unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(US) +
> 1;	\
> -	int ret__ = 0;						
> 	\
> -	while (!(COND)) {						
> \
> -		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout__)) {		
> 	\
> -			if (!(COND))					
> \
> -				ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT;			
> \
> +	int ret__;							
> \
> +	for (;;) {							
> \
> +		bool expired__ = time_after(jiffies, timeout__);	
> \
> +		if (COND) {						
> \
> +			ret__ = 0;					
> \
> +			break;					
> 	\
> +		}							
> \
> +		if (expired__) {					
> \
> +			ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT;				
> \
>  			break;					
> 	\
>  		}							
> \
>  		if ((W) && drm_can_sleep()) {			
> 	\
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-14 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-13 19:40 [PATCH] drm/i915: Only expand COND once in wait_for() Chris Wilson
2016-09-13 21:05 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-09-14  5:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-09-14  9:22 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2016-09-14 12:10   ` Dave Gordon
2016-09-14 18:53     ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2016-09-15  9:50       ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-14 13:37   ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-09-14 12:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Only expand COND once in wait_for() (rev2) Patchwork
2016-09-15  7:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2016-09-19  1:40 ` [drm/i915] c19d736b05: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 236 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1085 intel_disable_pipe+0x157/0x250 [i915] kernel test robot
2016-09-19  1:40   ` [lkp] " kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1473879212.2435.115.camel@intel.com \
    --to=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.