From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pure.logic@nexus-software.ie (Bryan O'Donoghue) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 17:09:06 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] Greybus driver subsystem for 4.9-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20160915154736.GA19214@leverpostej> References: <20160914173625.GB15356@leverpostej> <20160914180754.GA16053@kroah.com> <20160914182952.GA21615@kroah.com> <1473932133.10230.25.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20160915101330.GB6718@leverpostej> <1473935756.10230.42.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20160915112029.GC6718@leverpostej> <1473940088.10230.65.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20160915124601.GA9316@leverpostej> <1473954000.4035.5.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20160915154736.GA19214@leverpostej> Message-ID: <1473955746.4035.23.camel@nexus-software.ie> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 16:47 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On? > I can't say this any more explicitly: > > **************************************************** > * The DT *cannot* know anything about get_cycles() * > **************************************************** > > It's no more complex than that. Sure think Mark I understand your point. I think to satisfy your objection the most sensible change to make is using arch_timer_get_rate() compared to a desired rate of 19200000. --- bod From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753797AbcIOQFv (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:05:51 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]:33172 "EHLO mail-lf0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753129AbcIOQFs (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:05:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1473955746.4035.23.camel@nexus-software.ie> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Greybus driver subsystem for 4.9-rc1 From: "Bryan O'Donoghue" To: Mark Rutland Cc: Greg KH , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hovold , Rui Miguel Silva , Laurent Pinchart , Sandeep Patil , Matt Porter , John Stultz , Rob Herring , Viresh Kumar , Alex Elder , David Lin , Vaibhav Agarwal , Mark Greer , marc.zyngier@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 17:09:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160915154736.GA19214@leverpostej> References: <20160914173625.GB15356@leverpostej> <20160914180754.GA16053@kroah.com> <20160914182952.GA21615@kroah.com> <1473932133.10230.25.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20160915101330.GB6718@leverpostej> <1473935756.10230.42.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20160915112029.GC6718@leverpostej> <1473940088.10230.65.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20160915124601.GA9316@leverpostej> <1473954000.4035.5.camel@nexus-software.ie> <20160915154736.GA19214@leverpostej> Organization: Nexus Software Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 16:47 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > OnĀ  > I can't say this any more explicitly: > > **************************************************** > * The DT *cannot* know anything about get_cycles() * > **************************************************** > > It's no more complex than that. Sure think Mark I understand your point. I think to satisfy your objection the most sensible change to make is using arch_timer_get_rate() compared to a desired rate of 19200000. --- bod