From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.org,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>, Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ceph: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok()
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:57:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474311422.5754.39.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474299059-14806-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 17:30 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> To avoid clearing of capabilities or security related extended
> attributes too early, inode_change_ok() will need to take dentry instead
> of inode. ceph_setattr() has the dentry easily available but
> __ceph_setattr() is also called from ceph_set_acl() where dentry is not
> easily available. Luckily that call path does not need inode_change_ok()
> to be called anyway. So reorganize functions a bit so that
> inode_change_ok() is called only from paths where dentry is available.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
> fs/ceph/acl.c | 5 +++++
> fs/ceph/inode.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/acl.c b/fs/ceph/acl.c
> index 013151d50069..a2cedfde75eb 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/acl.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/acl.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,11 @@ int ceph_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
> > goto out_free;
> > }
>
> > + if (ceph_snap(inode) != CEPH_NOSNAP) {
> > + ret = -EROFS;
> > + goto out_free;
> > + }
> +
So to make sure I understand: What's the expected behavior when someone
changes the ACL in such a way that the mode gets changed? Should
security_inode_killpriv be getting called in that case? If so, where
does that happen, as I don't see notify_change being called in this
codepath?
> if (new_mode != old_mode) {
> > newattrs.ia_mode = new_mode;
> > newattrs.ia_valid = ATTR_MODE;
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/inode.c b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> index dd3a6dbf71eb..2aa3c0bcf3a5 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> @@ -1905,13 +1905,6 @@ int __ceph_setattr(struct inode *inode, struct iattr *attr)
> > int inode_dirty_flags = 0;
> > bool lock_snap_rwsem = false;
>
> > - if (ceph_snap(inode) != CEPH_NOSNAP)
> > - return -EROFS;
> -
> > - err = inode_change_ok(inode, attr);
> > - if (err != 0)
> > - return err;
> -
> > prealloc_cf = ceph_alloc_cap_flush();
> > if (!prealloc_cf)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -2124,7 +2117,17 @@ out_put:
> */
> int ceph_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
> {
> > - return __ceph_setattr(d_inode(dentry), attr);
> > + struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
> > + int err;
> +
> > + if (ceph_snap(inode) != CEPH_NOSNAP)
> > + return -EROFS;
> +
> > + err = inode_change_ok(inode, attr);
> > + if (err != 0)
> > + return err;
> +
> > + return __ceph_setattr(inode, attr);
> }
>
> /*
Looks reasonable though:
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-19 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-19 15:30 [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] fs: Avoid premature clearing of file capabilities Jan Kara
2016-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok() Jan Kara
2016-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] ceph: " Jan Kara
2016-09-19 18:57 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2016-09-22 8:50 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-22 8:50 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-22 17:20 ` Jeff Layton
2016-09-26 10:25 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-26 10:25 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-23 7:45 ` Yan, Zheng
2016-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] fuse: " Jan Kara
2016-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: Give dentry to inode_change_ok() instead of inode Jan Kara
2016-09-19 15:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] fs: Avoid premature clearing of capabilities Jan Kara
2016-09-19 15:38 ` [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] fs: Avoid premature clearing of file capabilities Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-03 11:28 [PATCH 0/5 v2] " Jan Kara
2016-08-03 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] ceph: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok() Jan Kara
2016-08-03 11:28 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-26 16:19 [PATCH 0/5] fs: Avoid premature clearing of file capabilities Jan Kara
2016-05-26 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] ceph: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok() Jan Kara
2016-05-26 16:19 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1474311422.5754.39.camel@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=sage@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.org \
--cc=zyan@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.