From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D6960938 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u8NE1Eh5018025; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:01:14 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nxKrsnyaCQ9T; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:01:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u8NE1Ang018018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:01:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1474639270.7207.367.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Roman Savchenko , bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:01:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1474388588-1111-1-git-send-email-gmstima@gmail.com> <1474616753-26510-1-git-send-email-gmstima@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitbake: Correct broken symlink behaviour X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:01:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Roman, On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 10:55 +0300, Roman Savchenko wrote: > I adjusted commit message and function description. but I do not > agree with proposed > function name `create_valid_symlink`, becasue link creation could > fail - so I left `try_symlink` > to point this behaviour. I don't agree with "try_symlink" though, sorry. Link creation can fail but that is like any other function which can also fail. We don't prefix all function names with try_ because they can fail. We need a better name. Cheers, Richard