From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] autofs - make mountpoint checks namespace aware Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 08:11:09 +0800 Message-ID: <1474675869.3078.3.camel@themaw.net> References: <20160914061434.24714.490.stgit@pluto.themaw.net> <20160914061445.24714.68331.stgit@pluto.themaw.net> <20160917201000.omswgttgyzcu7jt6@mguzik> <1474248973.3204.14.camel@themaw.net> <87oa3iikgf.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <1474411462.22440.2.camel@themaw.net> <1474412413.22440.7.camel@themaw.net> <1474507987.12887.5.camel@themaw.net> <87k2e4c541.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <1474592141.3345.20.camel@themaw.net> <877fa39z1q.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <1474604774.3083.1.camel@themaw.net> <87oa3e8m2v.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=themaw.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=Kz6kEzglPSEEfc9kBlaQT249bUs=; b=fEsfrm oX3qkP/mZZ/a+XvBFKoJGoN49MtubHqhTJVCj2JbSGXQXOUp3w3yYGr8P4vmgkH2 9PJOiap8meH9WyFP5Inf+S9snlnfQSpRAtjWeYATvUk1/2jQWnt0w21RvM3o1O4m fNEt1DxtXgeIpEM+c3ECCoytP1KVtLCwQYAg0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=Kz6kEzglPSEEfc9 kBlaQT249bUs=; b=J5poU3JzcnT69rV4Ft5NfQXK4GrXsre6ZpVJJZggmvufiR0 8jOlt7nzbC7H1X0jV2Ss2WBJJMbCRo8r94CJhLXqzeO/gKjZrqdwnO99PSuMHqoU pnPtY878odC8ZHqGdfRsNxFg4DPa6N6WFmWHyk2YYHfV1xb7SwmYgMGOu8TE= In-Reply-To: <87oa3e8m2v.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Mateusz Guzik , NeilBrown , Andrew Morton , autofs mailing list , Kernel Mailing List , Al Viro , linux-fsdevel , Omar Sandoval On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 14:15 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Ian Kent writes: > > 2> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > Ian Kent writes: > > > > > > > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > > > Ian Kent writes: > > > > > > > > > > > Eric, Mateusz, I appreciate your spending time on this and > > > > > > particularly > > > > > > pointing > > > > > > out my embarrassingly stupid is_local_mountpoint() usage mistake. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please accept my apology for the inconvenience. > > > > > > > > > > > > If all goes well (in testing) I'll have follow up patches to correct > > > > > > this > > > > > > fairly > > > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > > > Related question. Do you happen to know how many mounts per mount > > > > > namespace tend to be used? It looks like it is going to be wise to > > > > > put > > > > > a configurable limit on that number. And I would like the default to > > > > > be > > > > > something high enough most people don't care. I believe autofs is > > > > > likely where people tend to use the most mounts. > > > > Yes, I agree, I did want to try and avoid changing the parameters to > > ->d_mamange() but passing a struct path pointer might be better in the long > > run > > anyway. > > Given that there is exactly one implementation of d_manage in the tree I > don't imagine it will be disruptive to change that. Yes, but it could be used by external modules. And there's also have_submounts(). I can update that using the existing d_walk() infrastructure or take it (mostly) into the autofs module and get rid of have_submounts(). I'll go with the former to start with and see what people think. > > Eric