All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, wei.dai@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] app/test: remove large lpm test head file
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:37:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474882625-67916-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com> (raw)

remove the large file app/test/test_lpm_routes.h and add codes to
auto-generate similar large route rule talbe which keeps same depth
and IP class distribution as previous one in test_lpm_routes.h .
With the rule table auto-generated at run time, the performance
of looking up keep similar to that from pervious constant talbe.

Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_lpm.c        |       2 +-
 app/test/test_lpm_perf.c   |     268 +-
 app/test/test_lpm_routes.h | 1076861 -----------------------------------------
 3 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 1076865 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 app/test/test_lpm_routes.h

diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm.c b/app/test/test_lpm.c
index b6ad2eb..0952f52 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm.c
@@ -35,10 +35,10 @@
 #include <stdint.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 
+#include <rte_ip.h>
 #include <rte_lpm.h>
 
 #include "test.h"
-#include "test_lpm_routes.h"
 #include "test_xmmt_ops.h"
 
 #define TEST_LPM_ASSERT(cond) do {                                            \
diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
index 58eb415..5582ef4 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
@@ -34,14 +34,15 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
+#include <math.h>
 
 #include <rte_cycles.h>
 #include <rte_random.h>
 #include <rte_branch_prediction.h>
 #include <rte_lpm.h>
+#include <rte_ip.h>
 
 #include "test.h"
-#include "test_lpm_routes.h"
 #include "test_xmmt_ops.h"
 
 #define TEST_LPM_ASSERT(cond) do {                                            \
@@ -55,6 +56,265 @@
 #define BATCH_SIZE (1 << 12)
 #define BULK_SIZE 32
 
+#define MAX_RULE_NUM (1200000)
+
+struct route_rule {
+	uint32_t ip;
+	uint8_t depth;
+};
+
+struct route_rule large_route_table[MAX_RULE_NUM];
+
+static uint32_t num_route_entries;  /* NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES */
+#define NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES num_route_entries
+
+struct route_rule_count {
+	uint32_t total;
+	uint32_t a[RTE_LPM_MAX_DEPTH];
+	uint32_t b[RTE_LPM_MAX_DEPTH];
+	uint32_t c[RTE_LPM_MAX_DEPTH];
+	uint32_t left;
+	uint32_t abc[3*RTE_LPM_MAX_DEPTH];
+};
+
+static struct route_rule_count rule_count = {
+	.a = {
+		    0, /* depth =  1 */
+		    0, /* depth =  2 */
+		    1, /* depth =  3 */
+		    0, /* depth =  4 */
+		    2, /* depth =  5 */
+		    1, /* depth =  6 */
+		    3, /* depth =  7 */
+		  185, /* depth =  8 */
+		   26, /* depth =  9 */
+		   16, /* depth = 10 */
+		   39, /* depth = 11 */
+		  144, /* depth = 12 */
+		  233, /* depth = 13 */
+		  528, /* depth = 14 */
+		  866, /* depth = 15 */
+		 3856, /* depth = 16 */
+		 3268, /* depth = 17 */
+		 5662, /* depth = 18 */
+		17301, /* depth = 19 */
+		22226, /* depth = 20 */
+		11147, /* depth = 21 */
+		16746, /* depth = 22 */
+		17120, /* depth = 23 */
+		77578, /* depth = 24 */
+		  401, /* depth = 25 */
+		  656, /* depth = 26 */
+		 1107, /* depth = 27 */
+		 1121, /* depth = 28 */
+		 2316, /* depth = 29 */
+		  717, /* depth = 30 */
+		   10, /* depth = 31 */
+		   66  /* depth = 32 */
+	},
+	.b = {
+		    0, /* depth =  1 */
+		    0, /* depth =  2 */
+		    0, /* depth =  3 */
+		    0, /* depth =  4 */
+		    1, /* depth =  5 */
+		    1, /* depth =  6 */
+		    1, /* depth =  7 */
+		    3, /* depth =  8 */
+		    3, /* depth =  9 */
+		   30, /* depth = 10 */
+		   25, /* depth = 11 */
+		  168, /* depth = 12 */
+		  305, /* depth = 13 */
+		  569, /* depth = 14 */
+		 1129, /* depth = 15 */
+		50800, /* depth = 16 */
+		 1645, /* depth = 17 */
+		 1820, /* depth = 18 */
+		 3506, /* depth = 19 */
+		 3258, /* depth = 20 */
+		 3424, /* depth = 21 */
+		 4971, /* depth = 22 */
+		 6885, /* depth = 23 */
+		39771, /* depth = 24 */
+		  424, /* depth = 25 */
+		  170, /* depth = 26 */
+		  433, /* depth = 27 */
+		   92, /* depth = 28 */
+		  366, /* depth = 29 */
+		  377, /* depth = 30 */
+		    2, /* depth = 31 */
+		  200  /* depth = 32 */
+	},
+	.c = {
+		     0, /* depth =  1 */
+		     0, /* depth =  2 */
+		     0, /* depth =  3 */
+		     0, /* depth =  4 */
+		     0, /* depth =  5 */
+		     0, /* depth =  6 */
+		     0, /* depth =  7 */
+		    12, /* depth =  8 */
+		     8, /* depth =  9 */
+		     9, /* depth = 10 */
+		    33, /* depth = 11 */
+		    69, /* depth = 12 */
+		   237, /* depth = 13 */
+		  1007, /* depth = 14 */
+		  1717, /* depth = 15 */
+		 14663, /* depth = 16 */
+		  8070, /* depth = 17 */
+		 16185, /* depth = 18 */
+		 48261, /* depth = 19 */
+		 36870, /* depth = 20 */
+		 33960, /* depth = 21 */
+		 50638, /* depth = 22 */
+		 61422, /* depth = 23 */
+		466549, /* depth = 24 */
+		  1829, /* depth = 25 */
+		  4824, /* depth = 26 */
+		  4927, /* depth = 27 */
+		  5914, /* depth = 28 */
+		 10254, /* depth = 29 */
+		  4905, /* depth = 30 */
+		     1, /* depth = 31 */
+		   716  /* depth = 32 */
+	}
+};
+
+static void init_rule_count(void)
+{
+	uint32_t depth;
+	uint32_t count;
+
+	rule_count.left = 0;
+	count = 0;
+
+	for (depth = 1; depth <= RTE_LPM_MAX_DEPTH; depth++) {
+		count += rule_count.a[depth-1];
+		if (rule_count.a[depth-1])
+			rule_count.abc[rule_count.left++] = depth;
+	}
+
+	for (depth = 1; depth <= RTE_LPM_MAX_DEPTH; depth++) {
+		count += rule_count.b[depth-1];
+		if (rule_count.b[depth-1])
+			rule_count.abc[rule_count.left++] = 256 + depth;
+	}
+
+	for (depth = 1; depth <= RTE_LPM_MAX_DEPTH; depth++) {
+		count += rule_count.c[depth-1];
+		if (rule_count.c[depth-1])
+			rule_count.abc[rule_count.left++] = 512 + depth;
+	}
+	rule_count.total = count;
+}
+
+static void generate_random_rule_prefix(uint32_t ip_class, uint8_t depth)
+{
+#define IP_HEAD_MASK_A  0x00000000  /* 0xxx */
+#define IP_HEAD_MASK_B  0x80000000  /* 10xx */
+#define IP_HEAD_MASK_C  0xC0000000  /* 110x */
+#define IP_HEAD_BIT_NUM_A 1
+#define IP_HEAD_BIT_NUM_B 2
+#define IP_HEAD_BIT_NUM_C 3
+
+	uint32_t depth_1;
+	uint32_t class_depth;
+	uint32_t range;
+	uint32_t mask;
+	uint32_t step;
+	uint32_t start;
+	uint32_t fixed_bit_num;
+	uint32_t ip_head_mask;
+	uint32_t rule_num;
+	uint32_t k;
+	struct route_rule *ptr_rule;
+
+	depth_1 = depth - 1;
+
+	if (ip_class == 0) { /* IP Address class A */
+		fixed_bit_num = IP_HEAD_BIT_NUM_A;
+		ip_head_mask = IP_HEAD_MASK_A;
+		rule_num = rule_count.a[depth_1];
+	} else if (ip_class == 1) { /* IP Address class B */
+		fixed_bit_num = IP_HEAD_BIT_NUM_B;
+		ip_head_mask = IP_HEAD_MASK_B;
+		rule_num = rule_count.b[depth_1];
+	} else { /* IP Address class C */
+		fixed_bit_num = IP_HEAD_BIT_NUM_C;
+		ip_head_mask = IP_HEAD_MASK_C;
+		rule_num = rule_count.c[depth_1];
+	}
+
+	class_depth = depth - fixed_bit_num;
+	range = 1 << class_depth;
+	mask = range - 1;
+	if (range <= rule_num)
+		step = 1;
+	else
+		step = round((double)range / rule_num);
+
+	start = lrand48() & mask;
+	ptr_rule = &large_route_table[num_route_entries];
+	for (k = 0; k < rule_num; k++) {
+		ptr_rule->ip = (start << (RTE_LPM_MAX_DEPTH - depth))
+			| ip_head_mask;
+		ptr_rule->depth = depth;
+		ptr_rule++;
+		start = (start + step) & mask;
+	}
+	num_route_entries += rule_num;
+}
+
+static void insert_rule_in_random_pos(uint32_t ip, uint8_t depth)
+{
+	uint32_t pos;
+	int try_count = 0;
+	struct route_rule tmp;
+
+	do {
+		pos = lrand48();
+		try_count++;
+	} while ((try_count < 10) && (pos > num_route_entries));
+
+	if ((pos > num_route_entries) || (pos >= MAX_RULE_NUM))
+		pos = num_route_entries >> 1;
+
+	tmp = large_route_table[pos];
+	large_route_table[pos].ip = ip;
+	large_route_table[pos].depth = depth;
+	if (num_route_entries < MAX_RULE_NUM)
+		large_route_table[num_route_entries++] = tmp;
+}
+
+static void generate_large_route_rule_table(void)
+{
+	uint32_t idx;
+	uint32_t ip_class;
+	uint8_t  depth;
+
+	memset(large_route_table, 0, sizeof(large_route_table));
+	init_rule_count();
+
+	idx = 0;
+	do {
+		depth = (rule_count.abc[idx] & 0xFF);
+		ip_class = rule_count.abc[idx] >> 8;
+
+		generate_random_rule_prefix(ip_class, depth);
+
+		rule_count.left--;
+		idx++;
+	} while (rule_count.left > 0);
+
+	insert_rule_in_random_pos(IPv4(0, 0, 0, 0), 8);
+	insert_rule_in_random_pos(IPv4(10, 2, 23, 147), 32);
+	insert_rule_in_random_pos(IPv4(192, 168, 100, 10), 24);
+	insert_rule_in_random_pos(IPv4(192, 168, 25, 100), 24);
+	insert_rule_in_random_pos(IPv4(192, 168, 129, 124), 32);
+}
+
 static void
 print_route_distribution(const struct route_rule *table, uint32_t n)
 {
@@ -85,8 +345,8 @@ test_lpm_perf(void)
 	struct rte_lpm *lpm = NULL;
 	struct rte_lpm_config config;
 
-	config.max_rules = 1000000;
-	config.number_tbl8s = 256;
+	config.max_rules = 2000000;
+	config.number_tbl8s = 2048;
 	config.flags = 0;
 	uint64_t begin, total_time, lpm_used_entries = 0;
 	unsigned i, j;
@@ -97,6 +357,8 @@ test_lpm_perf(void)
 
 	rte_srand(rte_rdtsc());
 
+	generate_large_route_rule_table();
+
 	printf("No. routes = %u\n", (unsigned) NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
 
 	print_route_distribution(large_route_table, (uint32_t) NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_routes.h b/app/test/test_lpm_routes.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 023b0f9..0000000
-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2016-09-26  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-26  9:37 Wei Dai [this message]
2016-09-26  9:56 ` [PATCH] app/test: remove large lpm test head file Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-26 13:07   ` Dai, Wei
2016-09-26 10:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-09-26 13:49   ` Dai, Wei
2016-09-27 17:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Wei Dai
2016-09-28  8:41   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-09-28 15:19     ` Dai, Wei
2016-10-13 13:28   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1474882625-67916-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com \
    --to=wei.dai@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.