From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jack@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mszeredi@redhat.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "fanotify: fix list corruption in fanotify_get_response()" has been added to the 4.7-stable tree
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:04:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14749886867486@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fanotify: fix list corruption in fanotify_get_response()
to the 4.7-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fanotify-fix-list-corruption-in-fanotify_get_response.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.7 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 96d41019e3ac55f6f0115b0ce97e4f24a3d636d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:44:30 -0700
Subject: fanotify: fix list corruption in fanotify_get_response()
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
commit 96d41019e3ac55f6f0115b0ce97e4f24a3d636d2 upstream.
fanotify_get_response() calls fsnotify_remove_event() when it finds that
group is being released from fanotify_release() (bypass_perm is set).
However the event it removes need not be only in the group's notification
queue but it can have already moved to access_list (userspace read the
event before closing the fanotify instance fd) which is protected by a
different lock. Thus when fsnotify_remove_event() races with
fanotify_release() operating on access_list, the list can get corrupted.
Fix the problem by moving all the logic removing permission events from
the lists to one place - fanotify_release().
Fixes: 5838d4442bd5 ("fanotify: fix double free of pending permission events")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 13 +------------
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
fs/notify/notification.c | 15 ---------------
include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 3 ---
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -67,18 +67,7 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct
pr_debug("%s: group=%p event=%p\n", __func__, group, event);
- wait_event(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq, event->response ||
- atomic_read(&group->fanotify_data.bypass_perm));
-
- if (!event->response) { /* bypass_perm set */
- /*
- * Event was canceled because group is being destroyed. Remove
- * it from group's event list because we are responsible for
- * freeing the permission event.
- */
- fsnotify_remove_event(group, &event->fae.fse);
- return 0;
- }
+ wait_event(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq, event->response);
/* userspace responded, convert to something usable */
switch (event->response) {
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -358,16 +358,20 @@ static int fanotify_release(struct inode
#ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS
struct fanotify_perm_event_info *event, *next;
+ struct fsnotify_event *fsn_event;
/*
- * There may be still new events arriving in the notification queue
- * but since userspace cannot use fanotify fd anymore, no event can
- * enter or leave access_list by now.
+ * Stop new events from arriving in the notification queue. since
+ * userspace cannot use fanotify fd anymore, no event can enter or
+ * leave access_list by now either.
*/
- spin_lock(&group->fanotify_data.access_lock);
-
- atomic_inc(&group->fanotify_data.bypass_perm);
+ fsnotify_group_stop_queueing(group);
+ /*
+ * Process all permission events on access_list and notification queue
+ * and simulate reply from userspace.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&group->fanotify_data.access_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(event, next, &group->fanotify_data.access_list,
fae.fse.list) {
pr_debug("%s: found group=%p event=%p\n", __func__, group,
@@ -379,12 +383,21 @@ static int fanotify_release(struct inode
spin_unlock(&group->fanotify_data.access_lock);
/*
- * Since bypass_perm is set, newly queued events will not wait for
- * access response. Wake up the already sleeping ones now.
- * synchronize_srcu() in fsnotify_destroy_group() will wait for all
- * processes sleeping in fanotify_handle_event() waiting for access
- * response and thus also for all permission events to be freed.
+ * Destroy all non-permission events. For permission events just
+ * dequeue them and set the response. They will be freed once the
+ * response is consumed and fanotify_get_response() returns.
*/
+ mutex_lock(&group->notification_mutex);
+ while (!fsnotify_notify_queue_is_empty(group)) {
+ fsn_event = fsnotify_remove_first_event(group);
+ if (!(fsn_event->mask & FAN_ALL_PERM_EVENTS))
+ fsnotify_destroy_event(group, fsn_event);
+ else
+ FANOTIFY_PE(fsn_event)->response = FAN_ALLOW;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&group->notification_mutex);
+
+ /* Response for all permission events it set, wakeup waiters */
wake_up(&group->fanotify_data.access_waitq);
#endif
@@ -755,7 +768,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(fanotify_init, unsigned
spin_lock_init(&group->fanotify_data.access_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&group->fanotify_data.access_waitq);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->fanotify_data.access_list);
- atomic_set(&group->fanotify_data.bypass_perm, 0);
#endif
switch (flags & FAN_ALL_CLASS_BITS) {
case FAN_CLASS_NOTIF:
--- a/fs/notify/notification.c
+++ b/fs/notify/notification.c
@@ -132,21 +132,6 @@ queue:
}
/*
- * Remove @event from group's notification queue. It is the responsibility of
- * the caller to destroy the event.
- */
-void fsnotify_remove_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
- struct fsnotify_event *event)
-{
- mutex_lock(&group->notification_mutex);
- if (!list_empty(&event->list)) {
- list_del_init(&event->list);
- group->q_len--;
- }
- mutex_unlock(&group->notification_mutex);
-}
-
-/*
* Remove and return the first event from the notification list. It is the
* responsibility of the caller to destroy the obtained event
*/
--- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
@@ -180,7 +180,6 @@ struct fsnotify_group {
spinlock_t access_lock;
struct list_head access_list;
wait_queue_head_t access_waitq;
- atomic_t bypass_perm;
#endif /* CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS */
int f_flags;
unsigned int max_marks;
@@ -318,8 +317,6 @@ extern int fsnotify_add_event(struct fsn
struct fsnotify_event *event,
int (*merge)(struct list_head *,
struct fsnotify_event *));
-/* Remove passed event from groups notification queue */
-extern void fsnotify_remove_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, struct fsnotify_event *event);
/* true if the group notification queue is empty */
extern bool fsnotify_notify_queue_is_empty(struct fsnotify_group *group);
/* return, but do not dequeue the first event on the notification queue */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jack@suse.cz are
queue-4.7/fanotify-fix-list-corruption-in-fanotify_get_response.patch
queue-4.7/fsnotify-add-a-way-to-stop-queueing-events-on-group-shutdown.patch
queue-4.7/reiserfs-fix-new_insert_key-may-be-used-uninitialized.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14749886867486@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.