All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1475652134.2070.0.camel@gmail.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index ae5294e..085442c 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -51,14 +51,15 @@ On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 10:23 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
 > > > +	/* Sanity check for the property layout (first two bytes
 > > > are
 > > > header) */
-> > > +	assert(plen >= 8 && prop->data[1] = 0 && prop->data[0]
-> > > <> > > plen - 2);
+> > > +	assert(plen >= 8 && prop->data[1] == 0 && prop->data[0]
+> > > <=
+> > > plen - 2);
 > > Just curious as to why you're checking "prop->data[0] *<=* plen -
 > > 2" as
-> > isn't anything other than prop->data[0] *=* plen - 2 an error in
+> > isn't anything other than prop->data[0] *==* plen - 2 an error in
 > > the
 > > structure of ibm,pa-features and thus an error in the device-tree?
-> QEMU currently uses prop->data[0] = plen - 2 , but looking at the
+> QEMU currently uses prop->data[0] == plen - 2 , but looking at the
 > LoPAPR specification, it clearly defines this property as
 > "prop-encoded-array: One or more attribute-descriptor(s)", so there
 > could be two or more attributes encoded in this property. While there
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f5bbd09..8cd2204 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  "ref\0e46852e2-6a95-316d-c0d8-b2e7dd52ea13@redhat.com\0"
  "From\0Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2] powerpc: Check whether TM is available before running other tests\0"
- "Date\0Wed, 05 Oct 2016 07:22:14 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Wed, 05 Oct 2016 18:22:14 +1100\0"
  "To\0Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>"
  " kvm@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "Cc\0Radim Kr\304\215m\303\241\305\231 <rkrcmar@redhat.com>"
@@ -65,14 +65,15 @@
  "> > > +\t/* Sanity check for the property layout (first two bytes\n"
  "> > > are\n"
  "> > > header) */\n"
- "> > > +\tassert(plen >= 8 && prop->data[1] = 0 && prop->data[0]\n"
- "> > > <> > > plen - 2);\n"
+ "> > > +\tassert(plen >= 8 && prop->data[1] == 0 && prop->data[0]\n"
+ "> > > <=\n"
+ "> > > plen - 2);\n"
  "> > Just curious as to why you're checking \"prop->data[0] *<=* plen -\n"
  "> > 2\" as\n"
- "> > isn't anything other than prop->data[0] *=* plen - 2 an error in\n"
+ "> > isn't anything other than prop->data[0] *==* plen - 2 an error in\n"
  "> > the\n"
  "> > structure of ibm,pa-features and thus an error in the device-tree?\n"
- "> QEMU currently uses prop->data[0] = plen - 2 , but looking at the\n"
+ "> QEMU currently uses prop->data[0] == plen - 2 , but looking at the\n"
  "> LoPAPR specification, it clearly defines this property as\n"
  "> \"prop-encoded-array: One or more attribute-descriptor(s)\", so there\n"
  "> could be two or more attributes encoded in this property. While there\n"
@@ -114,4 +115,4 @@
  "> \302\240Thomas\n"
  >
 
-a1b97e16bdd8bcdc8659e45671a4ff1a1a05eeace5b50e104db6c78f6b5ff2e3
+8fefb7a61d91d336cc07cbae6767cc493985aaef482bafef73937d6e05eb4866

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.