From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: geert@linux-m68k.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux@sciencehorizons.net,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation" has been added to the 4.7-stable tree
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 15:28:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147567413572146@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation
to the 4.7-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
lib-test_hash.c-fix-warning-in-preprocessor-symbol-evaluation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.7 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From e6173ba42bbdba05fd4f3021c0beda0506271507 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:14:53 -0700
Subject: lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
commit e6173ba42bbdba05fd4f3021c0beda0506271507 upstream.
Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined
preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef:
lib/test_hash.c:224:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef]
#elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
^
lib/test_hash.c:229:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef]
#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
^
lib/test_hash.c:234:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64" is not defined [-Wundef]
#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
^
Seen with gcc 4.9, not seen with 4.1.2.
Change the logic to only check the value inside an #ifdef to fix this.
Fixes: 468a9428521e7d00 ("<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160829214952.1334674-4-arnd@arndb.de
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
lib/test_hash.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/test_hash.c
+++ b/lib/test_hash.c
@@ -219,21 +219,27 @@ test_hash_init(void)
}
/* Issue notices about skipped tests. */
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32
- pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32
+#if HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
pr_info("__hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
#endif
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32
- pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
+#else
+ pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32
+#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
pr_info("hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
#endif
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64
- pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
+#else
+ pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64
+#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
pr_info("hash_64() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
#endif
+#else
+ pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test.");
+#endif
pr_notice("%u tests passed.", tests);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from geert@linux-m68k.org are
queue-4.7/lib-test_hash.c-fix-warning-in-preprocessor-symbol-evaluation.patch
queue-4.7/nfc-fdp-detect-errors-from-fdp_nci_create_conn.patch
queue-4.7/lib-test_hash.c-fix-warning-in-two-dimensional-array-init.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-10-05 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147567413572146@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux@sciencehorizons.net \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.