Re: Master needs newer version of boost on centos?

["Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com>]

yarg, sorry

----- "Josh Durgin" <josh.durgin@inktank.com> wrote:

> ICL was added in 1.46 according to http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/.
> This also fails on debian wheezy with only 1.42 available:
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7422
> 
> On 02/14/2014 04:26 PM, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> > according to google, 1.41 ahould have it.
> >
> > ----- "Sage Weil" <sage@inktank.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> >>> but we haven't built on centos, to my knowledge...
> >>
> >> I think the question is really: is there an interval_set in boost
> 1.41
> >>
> >> that you can use, can you use something else instead, or do we need
> to
> >> do
> >> a boost backport in order to build for centos/rhel 6.x?
> >>
> >> sage
> >>
> >>>
> >>> ----- "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> oh, ok.  I think they need an extra boost rpm?
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- "Sage Weil" <sage@inktank.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hey Matt,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is in the libcephfs code I merged yesterday.  Any ideas?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>> sage
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The last couple builds of master have been failing on the
> >> centos
> >>>>> gitbuilder.
> >>>>>> here is the build log:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-centos6-amd64/log.cgi?log=f47062d8a66b94743888aaea13e0766579379395
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Its running into:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CXX mds/Capability.lo
> >>>>>> CXX mds/Dumper.lo
> >>>>>> In file included from client/Client.h:38,
> >>>>>> from libcephfs.cc:21:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>       error: client/barrier.h:25:38:
> >> boost/icl/interval_set.hpp:
> >>>> No
> >>>>> such
> >>>>>>       file or directory
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It looks like its not effecting fedora gitbuilders that have
> >> a
> >>>> newer
> >>>>> version
> >>>>>> of boost but on centos/rhel the version is only 1.41.0-18. Is
> >>>> there
> >>>>> something
> >>>>>> we can do to get around this without back-porting or will
> >>>>> backporting a newer
> >>>>>> boost for rhel/centos be necessary?
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> >>>>> ceph-devel" in
> >>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>>>>> More majordomo info at
> >>>> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Matt Benjamin
> >>>> The Linux Box
> >>>> 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
> >>>> Ann Arbor, MI  48104
> >>>>
> >>>> http://linuxbox.com
> >>>>
> >>>> tel.  734-761-4689
> >>>> fax.  734-769-8938
> >>>> cel.  734-216-5309
> >>>> --
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> >> ceph-devel"
> >>>> in
> >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>>> More majordomo info at
> >> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matt Benjamin
> >>> The Linux Box
> >>> 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
> >>> Ann Arbor, MI  48104
> >>>
> >>> http://linuxbox.com
> >>>
> >>> tel.  734-761-4689
> >>> fax.  734-769-8938
> >>> cel.  734-216-5309
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel.  734-761-4689 
fax.  734-769-8938 
cel.  734-216-5309