From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C221719B8 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u97FqKsJ020661; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:52:20 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uPq8xgOifWnY; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:52:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u97FqIPq020657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:52:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1475855537.30475.636.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Maciej =?UTF-8?Q?Borz=C4=99cki?= , Fan Xin Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 16:52:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <41bbea13-30ce-4d55-441c-ffdbb0f863f1@jp.fujitsu.com> <1475757767.3146.12.camel@linux.intel.com> <354af725-27e7-ba35-2a45-514151904c32@jp.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: rpm: Recover RPM4 to OE-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:52:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:20 +0200, Maciej Borzęcki wrote: > BTW. do you recall the rationale behind abandoning zypper in 1.4? I'm > curious about the motivation for using smart given its Python > dependency. zypper didn't cross compile easily and had a fairly nasty dependency chain if I remember rightly including things like boost. We had quite an extensive patchset against it and libzypp which could never be upstreamed: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=fcdc8d7f6d10b3abf9 f6a28cff55b1cc89b88bc9 zypper was also hostile to rpm5 if I remember rightly. Switching to something python based was much lower overhead on the system compared to C++ and boost. Cheers, Richard