From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F2C719DA for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2016 09:40:41 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,362,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="1046471341" Received: from jlock-mobl1.ld.intel.com ([10.103.239.41]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2016 09:40:40 -0700 Message-ID: <1476808839.14120.8.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Joshua Lock To: Leonardo Sandoval , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:40:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <770d29435af19aed00bd15d8b95504218ad600ec.1476462963.git.leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com> <1476688143.2604.9.camel@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] selftest: skip runtime-test's test_testimage_install on poky-tiny distro X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:40:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 11:02 -0500, Leonardo Sandoval wrote: > > On 10/17/2016 02:09 AM, Joshua Lock wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:40 -0500, > > leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > > > > From: Leonardo Sandoval > > om> > > > > > > Distro poky-tiny cannot build the core-image-full-cmdline image, > > > so > > > skip the > > > test if this is the case. > > > > > > [YOCTO #8525] > > Wouldn't it be better to use a different image, most likely with > > extra > > packages installed, and maybe a different list of TEST_SUITES for > > poky- > > tiny so that we're still testing this functionality on poky-tiny? > > Yes, that is a good idea. Which image and the accompanied tests do > you  > suggest? I'd be inclined to suggest core-image-minimal with extra packages installed to enable the same TEST_SUITES, but I can't recall exactly what's being tested here. Would that combination make sense? Thanks, Joshua > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Joshua > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval > > x.in > > > tel.com> > > > --- > > >   meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py | 2 ++ > > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py > > > b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py > > > index c2d5b45..e17c261 100644 > > > --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py > > > +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/runtime-test.py > > > @@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ class TestImage(oeSelfTest): > > >           Product: oe-core > > >           Author: Mariano Lopez > > >           """ > > > +        if self.distro == 'poky-tiny': > > > +            self.skipTest('core-image-full-cmdline not buildable > > > for > > > poky-tiny') > > >    > > >           features = 'INHERIT += "testimage"\n' > > >           features += 'TEST_SUITES = "ping ssh selftest"\n' > > > --  > > > 2.1.4 > > > >