From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Davide Caratti Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 1/3] netfilter: built-in NAT support for DCCP Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:30:10 +0200 Message-ID: <1476981010.2842.10.camel@redhat.com> References: <96409ea5aa35dd371f7ad0efa622339f82318b24.1476956422.git.dcaratti@redhat.com> <20161020123726.GA10040@salvia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy , Jozsef Kadlecsik , "David S. Miller" , Arturo Borrero Gonzalez , Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49266 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755211AbcJTQaP (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:30:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161020123726.GA10040@salvia> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 14:37 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > I think you can replace this by: > > #ifdef CONFIG_NF_NAT_PROTO_DCCP > > given that IS_ENABLED catches the module case too. That's right, so all IS_ENABLED(...) are going to be replaced with #ifdef ... in v2. regards, -- davide