All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, thenzl@redhat.com,
	kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 07:01:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477047706.2922.2.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476954305-576-5-git-send-email-sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>

On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 02:05 -0700, Sumit Saxena wrote:
> From previous patch we have below changes in v2 -
> 1.  Updated change log.  Provided more detail in change log.
> 2.  Agreed to remove module parameter. If we remove module parameter,
> we 
>     can ask customer to disable WCE on drive to get similar impact.
> 3.  Always Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE  for JBOD (non Raid) Device to
> Firmware.
>  
> Current megaraid_sas driver returns SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE(related to
> Drive
> Cache)  command  back to SCSI layer without sending it down to
> firmware as
> firmware supposed to take care of flushing disk cache for all drives
> belongs to Virtual Disk at the time of system reboot/shutdown.
>  
> We evaluate and understood that for Raid Volume, why driver should
> not
> send SYNC_CACHE command to the Firmware.
> There may be a some reason in past, but now it looks to be not
> required and
> we have fixed this issue as part of this patch.
> 
> Commit- " 02b01e0 [SCSI] megaraid_sas: return sync cache call with
> success"
> added the code in driver to return SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE without sending
> it to 
> firmware back in 2007. Earlier MR was mainly for Virtual Disk,
> so same code continue for JBOD as well whenever JBOD support was
> added and it introduced bug that
> SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE is not passed to FW for JBOD (non Raid disk).
> 
> But our recent analysis indicates that, From Day-1 MR Firmware always
> expect Driver to forward SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid disk)
> to the
> Firmware.
> We have fixed this as part of this patch.
>  
>  - Additional background -
> There are some instance of MegaRaid FW (E.a Gen2 and Gen2.5 FW) set
> WCE bit
> for Virtual Disk but firmware does not reply correct status for
> SYNCH_CACHE.
> It is very difficult to find out which Device ID and firmware has
> capability
> to manage SYNC_CACHE, so we managed to figure out which are the new
> firmware
> (canHandleSyncCache is set in scratch pad register at 0xB4) and use
> that
> interface for correct behavior as explained above.
>  
> E.g Liberator/Thunderbolt MegaRaid FW returns SYNC_CACHE as
> Unsupported
> command (this is a firmware bug) and eventually command will be
> failed to SML.
> This will cause File system to go Read-only.
>  
>  - New behavior described -
>  
> IF application requests SYNCH_CACHE
>    IF 'JBOD'
>               Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the FW
>                FW sends SYNCH_CACHE to drive
>                FW obtains status from drive and returns same status
> back to driver
>    ELSEIF 'VirtualDisk'
>                IF any FW which supports new API bit called
> canHandleSyncCache
>                               Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the
> FW
>                               FW does not send SYNCH_CACHE to drives
>                               FW returns SUCCESS
>                ELSE
>                               Driver does not send SYNCH_CACHE
> command to the FW.
>                               Driver return SUCCESS for that command.
>                ENDIF
>     ENDIF
> ENDIF
> 
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org

Can you please split this into two, so we can backport the bug fix
without any of the feature addition junk?

> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h        |  3 +++
>  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c   | 10 ++--------
>  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> index ca86c88..43fd14f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> @@ -1429,6 +1429,8 @@ enum FW_BOOT_CONTEXT {
>  #define MR_MAX_REPLY_QUEUES_EXT_OFFSET_SHIFT    14
>  #define MR_MAX_MSIX_REG_ARRAY                   16
>  #define MR_RDPQ_MODE_OFFSET			0X00800000
> +#define MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET		0X01000000
> +
>  /*
>  * register set for both 1068 and 1078 controllers
>  * structure extended for 1078 registers
> @@ -2140,6 +2142,7 @@ struct megasas_instance {
>  	u8 is_imr;
>  	u8 is_rdpq;
>  	bool dev_handle;
> +	bool fw_sync_cache_support;
>  };
>  struct MR_LD_VF_MAP {
>  	u32 size;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> index 3236632..f7a2ab1 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> @@ -1700,16 +1700,10 @@ inline int megasas_cmd_type(struct scsi_cmnd
> *cmd)
>  		goto out_done;
>  	}
>  
> -	switch (scmd->cmnd[0]) {
> -	case SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE:
> -		/*
> -		 * FW takes care of flush cache on its own
> -		 * No need to send it down
> -		 */
> +	if (MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL(scmd) && (scmd->cmnd[0] ==
> SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE) &&
> +		(!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)) {
>  		scmd->result = DID_OK << 16;
>  		goto out_done;

This, minus the  "&& (!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)" is all we need
for the bug fix, correct?

James

> -	default:
> -		break;
>  	}
>  
>  	return instance->instancet->build_and_issue_cmd(instance,
> scmd);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> index 2159f6a..2e61306 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> @@ -748,6 +748,11 @@ static int megasas_create_sg_sense_fusion(struct
> megasas_instance *instance)
>  		goto fail_fw_init;
>  	}
>  
> +	instance->fw_sync_cache_support = (scratch_pad_2 &
> +		MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET) ? 1 : 0;
> +	dev_info(&instance->pdev->dev, "FW supports sync cache\t:
> %s\n",
> +		 instance->fw_sync_cache_support ? "Yes" : "No");
> +
>  	IOCInitMessage =
>  	  dma_alloc_coherent(&instance->pdev->dev,
>  			     sizeof(struct MPI2_IOC_INIT_REQUEST),

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-21 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-20  9:04 [PATCH v2 0/7] megaraid_sas: Updates for scsi-next Sumit Saxena
2016-10-20  9:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] megaraid_sas: For SRIOV enabled firmware, ensure VF driver waits for 30secs before reset Sumit Saxena
2016-10-20  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] megaraid_sas: Send correct PhysArm to FW for R1 VD downgrade Sumit Saxena
2016-10-20  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] megaraid_sas: Do not fire DCMDs during PCI shutdown/detach Sumit Saxena
2016-10-20  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware Sumit Saxena
2016-10-21 10:01   ` Ric Wheeler
2016-10-21 11:01   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-10-21 16:01     ` Tomas Henzl
2016-10-20  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] MAINTAINERS: Update megaraid maintainers list Sumit Saxena
2016-10-20  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] megaraid_sas: Do not set MPI2_TYPE_CUDA for JBOD FP path for FW which does not support JBOD sequence map Sumit Saxena
2016-10-20  9:15   ` Greg KH
2016-10-20 11:51     ` James Bottomley
2016-10-20  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] megaraid_sas: driver version upgrade Sumit Saxena
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-21 12:08 [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware Kashyap Desai
2016-10-21 12:36 ` James Bottomley
2016-10-21 13:39   ` Kashyap Desai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1477047706.2922.2.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    --cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.