From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "Undekari, Sunil Dutt" <usdutt@qti.qualcomm.com>,
"Kushwaha, Purushottam" <pkushwah@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Malinen, Jouni" <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com>,
"Hullur Subramanyam, Amarnath" <amarnath@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cfg80211: Check radar_detect and num_different_channels with beacon interface combinations.
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:35:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477316138.4085.19.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a1df5c048894351bbec2d502772b862@aphydexm01f.ap.qualcomm.com>
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 11:59 +0000, Undekari, Sunil Dutt wrote:
> >
> > I've just sent out a few patches that, I think, implement the
> > necessary validation for just the beacon intervals, without all
> > this extra baggage. Please take a look and let me know what you
> > think.
> I understand that the new patches from you are in consistent with the
> existing design of validating the radar detection / channels by
> having this validation done in the cfg80211 drivers through
> cfg80211_check_combinations.
Ok, so we agree here, that's good :)
> With this approach , wouldn't the existing cfg80211 drivers behave
> the other way ? I mean , with these commits and the current cfg80211
> drivers ( do not advertise beacon_int_min_gcd and invoke
> cfg80211_check_combinations) , the validation for the different
> beacon interval shall succeed , but the current kernel ( cfg80211
> interface ) with the same driver fails the start of the AP / mesh.
> Is it not breaking the backward compatibility ? Is this expected ?
Any driver that supports combinations should also invoke
check_combinations. This doesn't appear to be true for mwifiex, but
that's already a bug/problem in that driver, it doesn't really change
much?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 15:15 [PATCH v3] cfg80211: Check radar_detect and num_different_channels with beacon interface combinations Purushottam Kushwaha
2016-10-21 12:27 ` Johannes Berg
2016-10-24 11:59 ` Undekari, Sunil Dutt
2016-10-24 13:35 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2016-10-24 14:20 ` Undekari, Sunil Dutt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1477316138.4085.19.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=amarnath@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jouni@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkushwah@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=usdutt@qti.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.