From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:34:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477467278196142@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cpufreq-skip-invalid-entries-when-searching-the-frequency.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 899bb6642f2a2f2cd3f77abd6c5a14550e3b37e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:45:05 +0530
Subject: cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency
From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
commit 899bb6642f2a2f2cd3f77abd6c5a14550e3b37e6 upstream.
Skip invalid entries when searching the frequency. This fixes cpufreq
at least on loongson2 MIPS board.
Fixes: da0c6dc00c69 (cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently)
Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -639,19 +639,19 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq >= target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Find lowest freq at or above target in a table in descending order */
@@ -659,28 +659,28 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
if (freq > target_freq) {
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found above target_freq */
- if (best == -1)
- return i;
+ if (best == table - 1)
+ return pos - table;
- return best;
+ return best - pos;
}
- return best;
+ return best - pos;
}
/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
@@ -700,28 +700,28 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
if (freq < target_freq) {
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found below target_freq */
- if (best == -1)
- return i;
+ if (best == table - 1)
+ return pos - table;
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Find highest freq at or below target in a table in descending order */
@@ -729,19 +729,19 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq <= target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
@@ -761,32 +761,32 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
if (freq < target_freq) {
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found below target_freq */
- if (best == -1)
- return i;
+ if (best == table - 1)
+ return pos - table;
/* Choose the closest freq */
- if (target_freq - table[best].frequency > freq - target_freq)
- return i;
+ if (target_freq - best->frequency > freq - target_freq)
+ return pos - table;
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Find closest freq to target in a table in descending order */
@@ -794,32 +794,32 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_ind
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
- int i, best = -1;
- for (i = 0; table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- freq = table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
- return i;
+ return pos - table;
if (freq > target_freq) {
- best = i;
+ best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found above target_freq */
- if (best == -1)
- return i;
+ if (best == table - 1)
+ return pos - table;
/* Choose the closest freq */
- if (table[best].frequency - target_freq > target_freq - freq)
- return i;
+ if (best->frequency - target_freq > target_freq - freq)
+ return pos - table;
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
- return best;
+ return best - table;
}
/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from aaro.koskinen@iki.fi are
queue-4.8/cpufreq-skip-invalid-entries-when-searching-the-frequency.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1477467278196142@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.