From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix unsafe HWP MSR access" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:34:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147746727881141@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix unsafe HWP MSR access
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cpufreq-intel_pstate-fix-unsafe-hwp-msr-access.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From f9f4872df6e1801572949f8a370c886122d4b6da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 12:42:38 -0700
Subject: cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix unsafe HWP MSR access
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
commit f9f4872df6e1801572949f8a370c886122d4b6da upstream.
This is a requirement that MSR MSR_PM_ENABLE must be set to 0x01 before
reading MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES on a given CPU. If cpufreq init() is
scheduled on a CPU which is not same as policy->cpu or migrates to a
different CPU before calling msr read for MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES, it
is possible that MSR_PM_ENABLE was not to set to 0x01 on that CPU.
This will cause GP fault. So like other places in this path
rdmsrl_on_cpu should be used instead of rdmsrl.
Moreover the scope of MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES is on per thread basis, so it
should be read from the same CPU, for which MSR MSR_HWP_REQUEST is
getting set.
dmesg dump or warning:
[ 22.014488] WARNING: CPU: 139 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/extable.c:50 ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe+0x68/0x70
[ 22.014492] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x771
[ 22.014493] Modules linked in:
[ 22.014507] CPU: 139 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.7.5+ #1
...
...
[ 22.014516] Call Trace:
[ 22.014542] [<ffffffff813d7dd1>] dump_stack+0x63/0x82
[ 22.014558] [<ffffffff8107bc8b>] __warn+0xcb/0xf0
[ 22.014561] [<ffffffff8107bcff>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
[ 22.014563] [<ffffffff810676f8>] ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe+0x68/0x70
[ 22.014564] [<ffffffff810677d9>] fixup_exception+0x39/0x50
[ 22.014604] [<ffffffff8102e400>] do_general_protection+0x80/0x150
[ 22.014610] [<ffffffff817f9ec8>] general_protection+0x28/0x30
[ 22.014635] [<ffffffff81687940>] ? get_target_pstate_use_performance+0xb0/0xb0
[ 22.014642] [<ffffffff810600c7>] ? native_read_msr+0x7/0x40
[ 22.014657] [<ffffffff81688123>] intel_pstate_hwp_set+0x23/0x130
[ 22.014660] [<ffffffff81688406>] intel_pstate_set_policy+0x1b6/0x340
[ 22.014662] [<ffffffff816829bb>] cpufreq_set_policy+0xeb/0x2c0
[ 22.014664] [<ffffffff81682f39>] cpufreq_init_policy+0x79/0xe0
[ 22.014666] [<ffffffff81682cb0>] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x120/0x120
[ 22.014669] [<ffffffff816833a6>] cpufreq_online+0x406/0x820
[ 22.014671] [<ffffffff8168381f>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x5f/0x90
[ 22.014717] [<ffffffff81530ac8>] subsys_interface_register+0xb8/0x100
[ 22.014719] [<ffffffff816821bc>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x14c/0x210
[ 22.014749] [<ffffffff81fe1d90>] intel_pstate_init+0x39d/0x4d5
[ 22.014751] [<ffffffff81fe13f2>] ? cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x12/0x12
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -556,12 +556,12 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_set(const s
int min, hw_min, max, hw_max, cpu, range, adj_range;
u64 value, cap;
- rdmsrl(MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES, cap);
- hw_min = HWP_LOWEST_PERF(cap);
- hw_max = HWP_HIGHEST_PERF(cap);
- range = hw_max - hw_min;
-
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
+ rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES, &cap);
+ hw_min = HWP_LOWEST_PERF(cap);
+ hw_max = HWP_HIGHEST_PERF(cap);
+ range = hw_max - hw_min;
+
rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, &value);
adj_range = limits->min_perf_pct * range / 100;
min = hw_min + adj_range;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com are
queue-4.8/cpufreq-intel_pstate-fix-unsafe-hwp-msr-access.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147746727881141@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.