From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: trond.myklebust@primarydata.com, Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com,
green@linuxhacker.ru, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "NFSv4: Don't report revoked delegations as valid in nfs_have_delegation()" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:15:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14774697384712@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
NFSv4: Don't report revoked delegations as valid in nfs_have_delegation()
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
nfsv4-don-t-report-revoked-delegations-as-valid-in-nfs_have_delegation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From b3f9e7239074613aa6bdafa4caf7c104fe1e7276 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:38:53 -0400
Subject: NFSv4: Don't report revoked delegations as valid in nfs_have_delegation()
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
commit b3f9e7239074613aa6bdafa4caf7c104fe1e7276 upstream.
If the delegation is revoked, then it can't be used for caching.
Fixes: 869f9dfa4d6d ("NFSv4: Fix races between nfs_remove_bad_delegation()...")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/delegation.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/nfs/delegation.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/delegation.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ nfs4_do_check_delegation(struct inode *i
rcu_read_lock();
delegation = rcu_dereference(NFS_I(inode)->delegation);
if (delegation != NULL && (delegation->type & flags) == flags &&
+ !test_bit(NFS_DELEGATION_REVOKED, &delegation->flags) &&
!test_bit(NFS_DELEGATION_RETURNING, &delegation->flags)) {
if (mark)
nfs_mark_delegation_referenced(delegation);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from trond.myklebust@primarydata.com are
queue-4.4/nfsv4-don-t-report-revoked-delegations-as-valid-in-nfs_have_delegation.patch
queue-4.4/nfsv4.2-fix-a-reference-leak-in-nfs42_proc_layoutstats_generic.patch
queue-4.4/nfsv4-open-state-recovery-must-account-for-file-permission-changes.patch
queue-4.4/nfsv4-nfs4_copy_delegation_stateid-must-fail-if-the-delegation-is-invalid.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14774697384712@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com \
--cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.