From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A135BE007D3; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 03:05:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.55.52.88 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58431E006E9 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 03:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2016 03:05:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,583,1473145200"; d="scan'208,217";a="186683501" Received: from jlock-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.15.10]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2016 03:05:26 -0700 Message-ID: <1478081125.22552.6.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Joshua Lock To: "Burton, Ross" , Bas Mevissen Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:05:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:05:32 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-8YB2D0pF4A/D/+joFvPh" --=-8YB2D0pF4A/D/+joFvPh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 17:11 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas Mevissen wrote: > > What are the criteria to call a distro supported? > > > > > > The short version is that it's a distro that doesn't change too much, is still supported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject.org running that distro. > > The Centos mismatch is annoying, can you please file a bug? > We previously had CentOS-7.* which was changed to CentOSLinux-7 in meta-yocto ce1fe45e9a18a82e2b95ea7e0b088ba595ceeee6. What's going on here? Are CentOS really changing the value of their Distributor ID for a released version? Or is the issue here that they aren't using consistent values for Distributor ID and its equivalent across /etc/lsb-release, /etc/redhat- release, /etc/os-release and other potential sources? Can someone with a CentOS 7 box pastebin their /etc/lsb-release, /etc/redhat-release and /etc/os-release? Joshua > --=-8YB2D0pF4A/D/+joFvPh Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 17:11 +0000, Burton, Ro= ss wrote:

On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas M= evissen <abuse@basmevissen.nl> wrote:
What are t= he criteria to call a distro supported?

The short version is that it's a distro that doesn= 't change too much, is still supported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject.org runni= ng that distro.

The Centos m= ismatch is annoying, can you please file a bug?

We previously had CentOS-7.* which was changed to CentOSLi= nux-7 in meta-yocto ce1fe45e9a18a82e2b95ea7e0b088ba595ceeee6.
What's going on here? Are CentOS really changing the value of t= heir Distributor ID for a released version?
Or is the issue here = that they aren't using consistent values for Distributor ID and its equival= ent across /etc/lsb-release, /etc/redhat-release, /etc/os-release and other= potential sources?

Can someone with a CentOS 7 bo= x pastebin their /etc/lsb-release, /etc/redhat-release and /etc/os-release?=

Joshua
--=-8YB2D0pF4A/D/+joFvPh--