From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <joshua.g.lock@linux.intel.com>
Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118)
	id 17644E00B3D; Wed,  2 Nov 2016 14:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	yocto-www.yoctoproject.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	*      [score: 0.0000]
	* -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	high *      trust
	*      [134.134.136.65 listed in list.dnswl.org]
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA439E00A64
	for <yocto@yoctoproject.org>; Wed,  2 Nov 2016 14:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32])
	by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2016 14:31:49 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,436,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="26766319"
Received: from jlock-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.15.10])
	by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2016 14:31:47 -0700
Message-ID: <1478122306.22552.59.camel@linux.intel.com>
From: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@linux.intel.com>
To: Bas Mevissen <abuse@basmevissen.nl>, "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:31:46 +0000
In-Reply-To: <0627d708-e6f4-df7e-5653-2e8ae1008d1b@basmevissen.nl>
References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com>
	<CAJTo0LaVygRC3Z5eVtgGVkCU0mgYv7SGx07+1_om0GKkf6fHvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl>
	<CAJTo0Lat2oz3dpRXC6tSve3drTMB+=93mfR=0-UjxYtfgqLrxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1478081125.22552.6.camel@linux.intel.com>
	<0627d708-e6f4-df7e-5653-2e8ae1008d1b@basmevissen.nl>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros
X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project <yocto.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/yocto>,
	<mailto:yocto-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto>
List-Post: <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yocto-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto>,
	<mailto:yocto-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:31:55 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 17:41 +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> On 02/11/16 11:05, Joshua Lock wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Can someone with a CentOS 7 box pastebin their /etc/lsb-release,
> > /etc/redhat-release and /etc/os-release?
> > 
> 
> /etc/lsb-release not available
> 
> 
> At launch (1406):
> 
> /etc/redhat-release (link to /etc/centos-release):
> CentOS Linux release 7.2.1406 (Core)
> 
> /etc/os-release:
> NAME="CentOS Linux"
> VERSION="7 (Core)"
> ID="centos"
> ID_LIKE="rhel fedora"
> VERSION_ID="7"
> PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)"
> ANSI_COLOR="0;31"
> CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7"
> HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/"
> BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/"
> 
> 
> 
> Currently (1511):
> 
> /etc/redhat-release (link to /etc/centos-release):
> CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core)
> 
> /etc/os-release:
> NAME="CentOS Linux"
> VERSION="7 (Core)"
> ID="centos"
> ID_LIKE="rhel fedora"
> VERSION_ID="7"
> PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)"
> ANSI_COLOR="0;31"
> CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7"
> HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/"
> BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/"
> 
> CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7"
> CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7"
> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos"
> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7"
> 
> So it seems to me that things have not changed in an unexpected way.

Thank you! Any chance you can share the output of `lsb_release -ir`
also?

Regards,

Joshua