From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 60173E0049A; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [135.11.29.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1DDE00444 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:19:27 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GCBAA/shhY/yYyC4ddHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?nMhFgEBAQEBH1iBAwGNLqtGggeGIgKCDT8UAQIBAQEBAQEBA18dC4RlAxIbXgE?= =?us-ascii?q?MCRVWJgEEGxqIMgGaIYUYl1AMJYY9iR6DL4IvBZQ8hV4Bmj6FfJEXHjZghROHQ?= =?us-ascii?q?gGBCwEBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GCBAA/shhY/yYyC4ddHAEBBAEBCgEBgnMhFgEBAQEBH1i?= =?us-ascii?q?BAwGNLqtGggeGIgKCDT8UAQIBAQEBAQEBA18dC4RlAxIbXgEMCRVWJgEEGxqIM?= =?us-ascii?q?gGaIYUYl1AMJYY9iR6DL4IvBZQ8hV4Bmj6FfJEXHjZghROHQgGBCwEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,580,1473134400"; d="scan'208,217";a="214368046" Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2016 11:19:04 -0400 X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1 Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-US1EXHC04.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.85.15]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Nov 2016 11:19:04 -0400 Received: from AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com ([fe80::c01d:740:c927:8888]) by AZ-US1EXHC04.global.avaya.com ([135.11.85.15]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:19:04 -0400 From: "Vuille, Martin (Martin)" To: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Thread-Topic: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros Thread-Index: AdI0UsdSor/FjekUSFCTTIyoE942Bw== Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:19:02 +0000 Message-ID: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.11.85.49] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:19:29 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEAAZUS1EXMB02glob_" --_000_30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEAAZUS1EXMB02glob_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Noticed that Ubuntu 16.04 LTS is not on the list of supported distributions for Morty. Is that correct/intentional, or a documentation oversight? Ubuntu 16.04 is mentioned elsewhere in the docs. We are planning to upgrade from Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and it would make more sense to go to the latest LTS rather than 14.04. MV --_000_30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEAAZUS1EXMB02glob_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Noticed that Ubuntu 16.04 LTS is not on the list of = supported

distributions for Morty.

 

Is that correct/intentional, or a documentation over= sight?

Ubuntu 16.04 is mentioned elsewhere in the docs.

 

We are planning to upgrade from Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and= it would

make more sense to go to the latest LTS rather than = 14.04.

 

MV

--_000_30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEAAZUS1EXMB02glob_-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 0D822E0049A; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:22:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [149.210.149.72 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from outbound1.mail.transip.nl (outbound1.mail.transip.nl [149.210.149.72]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8702DE00444 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from submission5.mail.transip.nl (submission5.mail.transip.nl [149.210.149.125]) by outbound1.mail.transip.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3t7Zjd5rgwzSMXg; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:22:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.frontend (web0.mail.transip.nl [149.210.149.95]) by submission5.mail.transip.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3t7ZjY6CLmz7tt2; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:22:41 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:22:43 +0100 From: Herman van Hazendonk To: "Vuille, Martin (Martin)" Mail-Reply-To: yoctoproject.org@herrie.org In-Reply-To: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: me@herrie.org User-Agent: Webmail X-Scanned-By: ClueGetter at submission5.mail.transip.nl X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@transip.nl Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: yoctoproject.org@herrie.org List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:22:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Martin, I would be surprised if it isn't. I've been running meta-openembedded and openembedded-core in our project without any issues on 16.04 with both Krogoth and Morty. Would be good if the project team can confirm though. Herman On 2016-11-01 16:19, Vuille, Martin (Martin) wrote: > Noticed that Ubuntu 16.04 LTS is not on the list of supported > > distributions for Morty. > > Is that correct/intentional, or a documentation oversight? > > Ubuntu 16.04 is mentioned elsewhere in the docs. > > We are planning to upgrade from Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and it would > > make more sense to go to the latest LTS rather than 14.04. > > MV From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 6C297E0045D; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:27:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.220.174 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com (mail-qk0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0897E0034A for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z190so201868855qkc.2 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:27:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RRdU07m19STxvDHfojVQjvSHOEyR1e1u/Vsb2Irkl4Y=; b=1DkFFGewF1WdQZowsQNNAj7xvAOPUe/ebzn4pPJYi4TL5bUlAoJSl9doUWmH7hQobe 2faFnv1VKUaqd1QxG7QhUmkPaQuvExvau9Igv4evjBiq02dk33EbAQww/Emo2WjL22wO 3gDjJKtWRpwdw16D3M/T84UKWXYz+elcQ1bTlUUvSobsvD+8tWklldmJf2JQCoDC7HXz 4vj3C1m4ypTnUWkcEVdkXro0TGZfiNqcFysR6/D8yzdTeegdt4nLwPil1CVizaL7Cl7W rL7evFTfczLan1UrGqvhPVE9CZ8qgx5t/LWzefzywMlxAlC1PZaTDARrrehR1lxz9b2E rCvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RRdU07m19STxvDHfojVQjvSHOEyR1e1u/Vsb2Irkl4Y=; b=VnNuo/IOhVyyPjEOLR4hRyEImBVmqm4WCR66/5d6jmx2Eusz6K43CbgSeh2tcZmfv4 rcAALsphLaq6Wc0G9Lb/czxsKlDnc8kL0F22F+5tVMXmAaiKc3q2DK2P4NmPIsZy14oH tYsUQ8boWYfhAmzux+OutZgaw7iHvnAjb1idgY2XLxnAOtvIgb+6xKD8XwBoyvHOmm63 gmSoL71tcJjE3aUzYPki5Vqb3OIQEtaQOoNZv23hmhpyd20XraMrgqLL6qcG2clzycA4 Ujxl1/UI73pJB5mOVi1UWsHc5ucRwGmAPre2FfWFoCqoJjnQ4AaxiB3ORo5PlSWTMuSJ cvfw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdkhphJ1UjHXL0JBy9l+xU5vyBvBFlkozW77iqw2qUwkj0TUmmXRklfyNFnBPtwCglD+OCXC87NBFbh4q3Z X-Received: by 10.55.215.6 with SMTP id m6mr28762008qki.244.1478014072745; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:27:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.85.208 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:27:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:27:32 +0000 Message-ID: To: "Vuille, Martin (Martin)" , "Rifenbark, Scott M" Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:27:56 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1149dcbcc7c73705403ef7f4 --001a1149dcbcc7c73705403ef7f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 1 November 2016 at 15:19, Vuille, Martin (Martin) wrote: > Is that correct/intentional, or a documentation oversight? > > Ubuntu 16.04 is mentioned elsewhere in the docs. > > That's a mistake, I consider the whitelist assignment in poky.conf to be canonical and that includes 16.04. Scott, can you update the list at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#detailed-supported-distros so that it reflects the list in the code: SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?= " \ poky-1.8 \n \ poky-2.0 \n \ poky-2.1 \n \ poky-2.2 \n \ Ubuntu-14.04 \n \ Ubuntu-14.10 \n \ Ubuntu-15.04 \n \ Ubuntu-15.10 \n \ Ubuntu-16.04 \n \ Fedora-22 \n \ Fedora-23 \n \ Fedora-24 \n \ CentOSLinux-7.* \n \ Debian-8.* \n \ openSUSE-13.2 \n \ SUSELINUX-42.1 \n \ " Ross --001a1149dcbcc7c73705403ef7f4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 1 November 2016 at 15:19, Vuille, Martin (Martin) <= vmartin@avaya.com> wrote:

Is that corr= ect/intentional, or a documentation oversight?

Ubuntu 16.04 is mentioned elsewhere in the docs.<= /u>


That's a mistake, I c= onsider the whitelist assignment in poky.conf to be canonical and that incl= udes 16.04.

Scott, can you update the list at=C2=A0ht= tp://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#detailed-supp= orted-distros so that it reflects the list in the code:

SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?=3D " \
= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 poky-1.8 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 poky-2.0 \n \
<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 poky-2.= 1 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 poky-2.2 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ubuntu-14.04 \n \
=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ubuntu-14.10 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ubuntu-15.04 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ub= untu-15.10 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ubuntu-16.04 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Fedora-22 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Fedora-23 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Fedora-24 \n \<= /div>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 C= entOSLinux-7.* \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Debian-8.* \n \
=C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 openSUSE-13.2 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 SUSELINUX-42.1 \n \
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 &q= uot;

Ross
--001a1149dcbcc7c73705403ef7f4-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 53960E0049D; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:31:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [135.11.29.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2FBE00444 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:31:00 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2EZAgCRtBhY/yYyC4ddGgEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QgBAQEBgnMhFgEBAQEBH1h8BwGNLpcBlEWCB4YiAhqBcz8UAQIBAQEBAQEBA18?= =?us-ascii?q?ohGEBAQEBAxIRCkwQAgEIDQQEAQELHQMCAgIwFAkIAQEEDgUIGogyAZ9AilmMb?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyGPYRVhEkVH4JOLYIvBZoaAZo+hXyNE4Q?= =?us-ascii?q?EHjZghRNyhlABgQsBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2EZAgCRtBhY/yYyC4ddGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgnMhFgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBH1h8BwGNLpcBlEWCB4YiAhqBcz8UAQIBAQEBAQEBA18ohGEBAQEBAxIRC?= =?us-ascii?q?kwQAgEIDQQEAQELHQMCAgIwFAkIAQEEDgUIGogyAZ9AilmMbQEBAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBARyGPYRVhEkVH4JOLYIvBZoaAZo+hXyNE4QEHjZghRNyhlABg?= =?us-ascii?q?QsBAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,580,1473134400"; d="scan'208,217";a="214370032" Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2016 11:30:59 -0400 X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1 Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-US1EXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.85.12]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Nov 2016 11:30:35 -0400 Received: from AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com ([fe80::c01d:740:c927:8888]) by AZ-US1EXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.11.85.12]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:30:34 -0400 From: "Vuille, Martin (Martin)" To: "Burton, Ross" Thread-Topic: [yocto] Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros Thread-Index: AdI0UsdSor/FjekUSFCTTIyoE942BwAIzZoAAAhKcHA= Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:30:33 +0000 Message-ID: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67C98@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.11.85.49] MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:31:02 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67C98AZUS1EXMB02glob_" --_000_30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67C98AZUS1EXMB02glob_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 VGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciB0aGUgcXVpY2sgYW5zd2VyDQpNVg0KDQpGcm9tOiBCdXJ0b24sIFJvc3Mg W21haWx0bzpyb3NzLmJ1cnRvbkBpbnRlbC5jb21dDQpTZW50OiBOb3ZlbWJlciAwMSwgMjAxNiAx MToyOA0KVG86IFZ1aWxsZSwgTWFydGluIChNYXJ0aW4pOyBSaWZlbmJhcmssIFNjb3R0IE0NCkNj OiB5b2N0b0B5b2N0b3Byb2plY3Qub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW3lvY3RvXSBZb2N0byAyLjIg TW9ydHkgc3VwcG9ydGVkIExpbnV4IERpc3Ryb3MNCg0KDQpPbiAxIE5vdmVtYmVyIDIwMTYgYXQg MTU6MTksIFZ1aWxsZSwgTWFydGluIChNYXJ0aW4pIDx2bWFydGluQGF2YXlhLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86 dm1hcnRpbkBhdmF5YS5jb20+PiB3cm90ZToNCklzIHRoYXQgY29ycmVjdC9pbnRlbnRpb25hbCwg b3IgYSBkb2N1bWVudGF0aW9uIG92ZXJzaWdodD8NClVidW50dSAxNi4wNCBpcyBtZW50aW9uZWQg ZWxzZXdoZXJlIGluIHRoZSBkb2NzLg0KDQpUaGF0J3MgYSBtaXN0YWtlLCBJIGNvbnNpZGVyIHRo ZSB3aGl0ZWxpc3QgYXNzaWdubWVudCBpbiBwb2t5LmNvbmYgdG8gYmUgY2Fub25pY2FsIGFuZCB0 aGF0IGluY2x1ZGVzIDE2LjA0Lg0KDQo= --_000_30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67C98AZUS1EXMB02glob_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTQgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 Q2FsaWJyaTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDE1IDUgMiAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJ e2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlRhaG9tYTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgNCAzIDUgNCA0IDIgNDt9DQov KiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1z b05vcm1hbA0KCXttYXJnaW46MGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNp emU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLCJzZXJpZiI7fQ0KYTps aW5rLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluaw0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6 Ymx1ZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCmE6dmlzaXRlZCwgc3Bhbi5Nc29I eXBlcmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6cHVycGxl Ow0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTcNCgl7bXNv LXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVwbHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5z LXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEO30NCi5Nc29DaHBEZWZhdWx0DQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10 eXBlOmV4cG9ydC1vbmx5Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIiwic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI7DQoJ bXNvLWZhcmVhc3QtbGFuZ3VhZ2U6RU4tVVM7fQ0KQHBhZ2UgV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3NpemU6 OC41aW4gMTEuMGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbjoxLjBpbiAxLjBpbiAxLjBpbiAxLjBpbjt9DQpkaXYuV29y ZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3BhZ2U6V29yZFNlY3Rpb24xO30NCi0tPjwvc3R5bGU+PCEtLVtpZiBndGUg bXNvIDldPjx4bWw+DQo8bzpzaGFwZWRlZmF1bHRzIHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0IiBzcGlkbWF4PSIxMDI2 IiAvPg0KPC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+PCEtLVtpZiBndGUgbXNvIDldPjx4bWw+DQo8bzpzaGFw ZWxheW91dCB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCI+DQo8bzppZG1hcCB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIgZGF0YT0iMSIgLz4N CjwvbzpzaGFwZWxheW91dD48L3htbD48IVtlbmRpZl0tLT4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IGxhbmc9 IkVOLUNBIiBsaW5rPSJibHVlIiB2bGluaz0icHVycGxlIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IldvcmRTZWN0 aW9uMSI+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBw dDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7 Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+VGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciB0aGUgcXVpY2sgYW5zd2VyPG86cD48L286cD48 L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTox MS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1 b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPk1WPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7 Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+ Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci1s ZWZ0OnNvbGlkIGJsdWUgMS41cHQ7cGFkZGluZzowaW4gMGluIDBpbiA0LjBwdCI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0K PGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7Ym9yZGVyLXRvcDpzb2xpZCAjQjVDNERGIDEuMHB0O3Bh ZGRpbmc6My4wcHQgMGluIDBpbiAwaW4iPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+PHNwYW4g bGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1Rh aG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7Ij5Gcm9tOjwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PHNwYW4g bGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O1Rh aG9tYSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7Ij4gQnVydG9uLCBSb3NzIFttYWlsdG86 cm9zcy5idXJ0b25AaW50ZWwuY29tXQ0KPGJyPg0KPGI+U2VudDo8L2I+IE5vdmVtYmVyIDAxLCAy MDE2IDExOjI4PGJyPg0KPGI+VG86PC9iPiBWdWlsbGUsIE1hcnRpbiAoTWFydGluKTsgUmlmZW5i YXJrLCBTY290dCBNPGJyPg0KPGI+Q2M6PC9iPiB5b2N0b0B5b2N0b3Byb2plY3Qub3JnPGJyPg0K PGI+U3ViamVjdDo8L2I+IFJlOiBbeW9jdG9dIFlvY3RvIDIuMiBNb3J0eSBzdXBwb3J0ZWQgTGlu dXggRGlzdHJvczxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFz cz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xh c3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCI+T24gMSBOb3ZlbWJlciAyMDE2IGF0IDE1OjE5LCBWdWlsbGUsIE1hcnRpbiAoTWFy dGluKSAmbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOnZtYXJ0aW5AYXZheWEuY29tIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFu ayI+dm1hcnRpbkBhdmF5YS5jb208L2E+Jmd0OyB3cm90ZTo8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzttc28tbWFyZ2lu LWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0byI+SXMgdGhhdCBjb3JyZWN0L2ludGVudGlvbmFsLCBvciBhIGRvY3Vt ZW50YXRpb24gb3ZlcnNpZ2h0PzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIg c3R5bGU9Im1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvO21zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRv Ij5VYnVudHUgMTYuMDQgaXMgbWVudGlvbmVkIGVsc2V3aGVyZSBpbiB0aGUgZG9jcy48bzpwPjwv bzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGJyPg0KVGhhdCdzIGEgbWlz dGFrZSwgSSBjb25zaWRlciB0aGUgd2hpdGVsaXN0IGFzc2lnbm1lbnQgaW4gcG9reS5jb25mIHRv IGJlIGNhbm9uaWNhbCBhbmQgdGhhdCBpbmNsdWRlcyAxNi4wNC48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwv ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67C98AZUS1EXMB02glob_-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 7FAE8E0049A; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:05:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from hosting.emcodev.net (hosting.emcodev.net [178.18.92.162]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ABCE00444 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hosting.emcodev.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20EC12AD51 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:05:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hosting.emcodev.net Received: from hosting.emcodev.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hosting.emcodev.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id nJXaYyzaedbm for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:05:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from whisper.local (541CD0EC.cm-5-5d.dynamic.ziggo.nl [84.28.208.236]) (Authenticated sender: bas@emcodev.nl) by hosting.emcodev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8284512AA59 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:05:11 +0100 (CET) From: Bas Mevissen To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> Message-ID: <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:05:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:05:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/11/16 16:27, Burton, Ross wrote: > > That's a mistake, I consider the whitelist assignment in poky.conf to be > canonical and that includes 16.04. > What are the criteria to call a distro supported? > Scott, can you update the list > at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#detailed-supported-distros > so that it reflects the list in the code: > > SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?= " \ > poky-1.8 \n \ > poky-2.0 \n \ > poky-2.1 \n \ > poky-2.2 \n \ > Ubuntu-14.04 \n \ > Ubuntu-14.10 \n \ > Ubuntu-15.04 \n \ > Ubuntu-15.10 \n \ > Ubuntu-16.04 \n \ > Fedora-22 \n \ > Fedora-23 \n \ > Fedora-24 \n \ Fedora 25 should be released in two weeks time (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule). Can it then still be added as a Morty supported distro version? > CentOSLinux-7.* \n \ I see in Poky current master when running bitbake: WARNING: Host distribution "CentOS-7.2.1511" has not been validated with this version of the build system; you may possibly experience unexpected failures. It is recommended that you use a tested distribution. It runs fine, but it seems to fail the distro test. Cheers, -- Bas. -- Bas. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2FB0BE0049B; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:11:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com (mail-qk0-f179.google.com [209.85.220.179]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42F7E0045D for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id v138so115973667qka.0 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:11:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uQh4eMT4zOUTWM28dgTn8WriP+LIdiTiYxuh/W3ghdw=; b=Vw0rCm3oLV/BaDlOFwlmUftKjeIn0uhFlOhMnErCucxRUZrGMYJtFpxiOBpPUzV4hL 1xVxsfpq5ufOX4YLe+uYH885QSMkiAoUYYLYBDYaV3RiNq2MO3VvYpfFQRdYbubBSWZY vi95XSsQaKTvfprWJ36t+WjqNl57fIq8RBi5jKnlIinHa6bl9Ql3N/1aXeGZC2dDl/EB A3dYOdd3gSiNr0/tALi+qws6Jw9XUcY4+RaIkMG6tlaRulkKJTBUg4MSkgROICPMp6Cv NgAvLOJ9huGgu+6ARe8ybXxCP9ZXKr4PITFE/M2oXH7NdDgTfZMwZE0WTMvxG5XKMJDr 5YsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uQh4eMT4zOUTWM28dgTn8WriP+LIdiTiYxuh/W3ghdw=; b=LCPKT8x+ainqNPwUd6KF23D7uYD3ldnDf69a9KuMaT0naHv/lzbkGIw7HU7tcqVfCZ CQVgVlX8Nmjkx+Sw3+9oKuZdsLy8qsgxHtqDOxJx+/cnfpfC1ejmg9Qo9VpozDwg70GY LJm6UDOo/gw7e7BoHn5V8mHA1OwFJTxiTeJZniPl69ECnn/Xi0+OYxEMrfsLn87Kosel rffjc5/8TQ4xOnLdLTEXNBpzRtQV5pGTOLX4yofrBPbjdZD6IWDI4vjTwO9EZ5Hr21lS 2M56iG0pYrS5p1hQlNmiW2IhLeuHNzZICahe3+UN3IiPsnKmgS51EyXCCQaSpmRnRGaS 4bgA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve5VSA2vPqjK91byEY4o4DQ33+FLLAlogmoLlGz2XRYAmy5qV6UsDl/kRSoCCp9G8FIJL2cwAQjj1EegzHE X-Received: by 10.55.8.20 with SMTP id 20mr34105538qki.3.1478020301503; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:11:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.85.208 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:11:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:11:21 +0000 Message-ID: To: Bas Mevissen Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:11:44 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114c9d600ad97d0540406b23 --001a114c9d600ad97d0540406b23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas Mevissen wrote: > What are the criteria to call a distro supported? > The short version is that it's a distro that doesn't change too much, is still supported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject.org running that distro. The Centos mismatch is annoying, can you please file a bug? Of course this is just a notice and you're entirely welcome to ignore it, or even set SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS to "" if you're using poky. Ross --001a114c9d600ad97d0540406b23 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas Mevissen <abuse@basmevissen.nl>= wrote:
What are the criteria to call a distro support= ed?

The short versi= on is that it's a distro that doesn't change too much, is still sup= ported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject.org running that distro.

The Centos mismatch i= s annoying, can you please file a bug?

=
Of course this is just a notice and you= 9;re entirely welcome to ignore it, or even set SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS to &q= uot;" if you're using poky.

Ross
--001a114c9d600ad97d0540406b23-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 624D1E006E9; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:39:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.55.52.115 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056C3E0049B for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:39:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2016 13:39:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,433,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="26313280" Received: from kgonza2-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.255.158.24]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2016 13:39:16 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:39:14 +1300 Message-ID: <5687539.b2UPXTCzMt@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.7.9-100.fc23.x86_64; KDE/4.14.20; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:39:21 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:11:21 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas Mevissen wrote: > > What are the criteria to call a distro supported? > > The short version is that it's a distro that doesn't change too much, is > still supported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject.org > running that distro. > > The Centos mismatch is annoying, can you please file a bug? > > Of course this is just a notice and you're entirely welcome to ignore it, > or even set SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS to "" if you're using poky. If you're not using a distro on the list (assuming the list is correct and complete, of course) what it really means is that you *may* be on your own sorting out any distro-related issues, but it doesn't mean that it definitely cannot work. There are people running builds regularly on distros that aren't on this list successfully, it's just that we can't commit to supporting all of the included functionality on all of them. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 98005E006E9; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:37:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from hosting.emcodev.net (hosting.emcodev.net [178.18.92.162]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F972E0049B for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hosting.emcodev.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC8412ADB8; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:37:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hosting.emcodev.net Received: from hosting.emcodev.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hosting.emcodev.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id h8bcaAHTDNMA; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:36:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from whisper.local (541CD0EC.cm-5-5d.dynamic.ziggo.nl [84.28.208.236]) (Authenticated sender: bas@emcodev.nl) by hosting.emcodev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E31512AB2F; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:36:46 +0100 (CET) To: "Burton, Ross" References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> From: Bas Mevissen Message-ID: <307cf616-d7a0-be5b-1aa9-4b12f3c9abb0@basmevissen.nl> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:36:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 21:37:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/11/16 18:11, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas Mevissen > wrote: > > What are the criteria to call a distro supported? > > The short version is that it's a distro that doesn't change too much, is > still supported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject.org > running that distro. > OK, clear. However, the "still supported" part would exclude older Fedora releases, even while perfectly usable for Yocto. > The Centos mismatch is annoying, can you please file a bug? > Done: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10577 > Of course this is just a notice and you're entirely welcome to ignore > it, It is not really bothering me, but it might be for a novice user or someone wanting to run official, central builds on a Centos 7.x host. > or even set SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS to "" if you're using poky. > I added that in the bug report as a side note to add that as a comment to poky.conf. Regards, -- Bas. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 86C99E006E9; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:21:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_HEADERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (danielhilst[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.217.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 1.0 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ua0-f178.google.com (mail-ua0-f178.google.com [209.85.217.178]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47159E0049B for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:20:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 51so122712952uai.1 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:20:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=2GbHNQGHQfILkq1z/qatfIJsN7TpqwS5R57vEsdO4FU=; b=FRebg+NZvFCrCjNAEKttxlJnzuzFskeMIitXDeStK6FDEWbaNiY0oXzVyJLAl/eoGk emOSlPpTp282V8N5dtjWFnoQwErnD0rRv1f//iZrRhJEayFGzO8kW8GJMpnO2LvxoOiW CBf4JLOYUTKO1f1wI7WkiClAkcG/tAU2mAStcoK+YPm51UzsmxYx7LUNTvoUyZk56aig lmoJrnIStlsMs5wIl0UQXRL05lAGi8e/Ar9xVxv3D+sCrhuShjEfCqzkUucSQ1mqrjay 2ivfgHgRwi0AYHn+0JdfFdJENV6iK33mb/oIJlYET+cDkavfyfurwTq2IfYok2Znaybu 3Dig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=2GbHNQGHQfILkq1z/qatfIJsN7TpqwS5R57vEsdO4FU=; b=FTpghapNXFluKSfFQH8fgD8CXmcD/DjUudrxlK4Xa63/xiYkkEz4ZNuxiunUj9+HiX HkP5KCMFm/kTcTZBK+9KDzkT4Wmw8vzf9TJZToeltRG7iQ1hPrIsDqr8O3I0X0byc743 Tt7AfO54nK6sgw/zVKI5EY66vKMhpFye7TwEGUvQLln3aKhVCSsu9S7pESYDYhBJL8a+ 3NedC1IPBD8mWG1H0h/f0+foK2B9iIWqvHKGGyzlgcxYr5MVRlARbe03ZiuFIw55CrSd 78b445zb+2DNnKDoI5XcX0XnGuDFMSnqpZoe8cMxuVRhZctwZ5YX8mgTiDQHx/hw38Nn z1FQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfg3EEWmd8Y3IwaQy45wFdPD29pSUB6dfbBAZbUdBrvwDHVruhXb6h3u+seftXGieaCSCf9xBng07AUnQ== X-Received: by 10.176.1.230 with SMTP id 93mr210818ual.168.1478038858040; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:20:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.1.68 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:20:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <307cf616-d7a0-be5b-1aa9-4b12f3c9abb0@basmevissen.nl> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <307cf616-d7a0-be5b-1aa9-4b12f3c9abb0@basmevissen.nl> From: "Daniel." Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 20:20:57 -0200 Message-ID: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 22:21:03 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135de44190ad4054044bdf4 --001a1135de44190ad4054044bdf4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Just as a note, I've been using archlinux for about a year and have never faced "distro related problems", except when the gcc6 comes out. Anyway I'm using daisy in my work. I think that making old releases supported by X distro doesn't make any sense... Cheers, 2016-11-01 19:36 GMT-02:00 Bas Mevissen : > On 01/11/16 18:11, Burton, Ross wrote: > >> >> On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas Mevissen > > wrote: >> >> What are the criteria to call a distro supported? >> >> The short version is that it's a distro that doesn't change too much, is >> still supported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject.org >> running that distro. >> >> > OK, clear. However, the "still supported" part would exclude older Fedora > releases, even while perfectly usable for Yocto. > > The Centos mismatch is annoying, can you please file a bug? >> >> > Done: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10577 > > Of course this is just a notice and you're entirely welcome to ignore >> it, >> > > It is not really bothering me, but it might be for a novice user or > someone wanting to run official, central builds on a Centos 7.x host. > > or even set SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS to "" if you're using poky. >> >> > I added that in the bug report as a side note to add that as a comment to > poky.conf. > > Regards, > > > -- > Bas. > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > -- *"Do or do not. There is no try"* *Yoda Master* --001a1135de44190ad4054044bdf4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just as a note, I've been using archlinux for abo= ut a year and have never faced "distro related problems", except = when the gcc6 comes out. Anyway I'm using daisy in my work. I think tha= t making old releases supported by X distro doesn't make any sense...
Cheers,

2016-11-01 19:36 GMT-02:00 Bas Mevissen <<= a href=3D"mailto:abuse@basmevissen.nl" target=3D"_blank">abuse@basmevissen.= nl>:
On 01= /11/16 18:11, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas Mevissen <abuse@basmevissen.nl
 <mailto:abuse@= basmevissen.nl>> wrote:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 What are the criteria to call a distro supported?

The short version is that it's a distro that doesn't change too muc= h, is
still supported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject= .org
 <http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org> running that= distro.


OK, clear. However, the "still supported" part would exclude olde= r Fedora releases, even while perfectly usable for Yocto.<= br>
The Centos mismatch is annoying, can you please file a bug?


 Done: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.or= g/show_bug.cgi?id=3D10577

Of course this is just a notice and you're entirely welcome to ignore it,

 It is not really bothering me, but it might be for a novice user or someone= wanting to run official, central builds on a Centos 7.x host.

or even set SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS to "" if you're using poky.=


I added that in the bug report as a side note to add that as a comment to p= oky.conf.

Regards,


--
Bas.
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproj= ect.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto<= br>



--
"Do or do not. There is no try"
=C2=A0 = Yoda Master
--001a1135de44190ad4054044bdf4-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A8103E0070F; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:22:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.216.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.216.173 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Received: from mail-qt0-f173.google.com (mail-qt0-f173.google.com [209.85.216.173]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC34E00509 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n6so68824756qtd.1 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:22:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9lBj+fXUlYI3ShjCJ1Pt28qTOcgJGTMFzLYw7a/KtuQ=; b=Wa9WNDm+iRRj+DhbMDOFMkwDupvClEkzDLLfNTcsAM410slqJho7pQIiEmxpPWBWOl AUMMmzjvwZvcM+xVk3rjO/7Kg3WWHZQRuFMtw55cyvA+9R2UH3Ex4+H04UZVGFDUfkcQ SkHe6cXpAZxJEOCJOVuF8jgTncarpR3HRppnrYnpi2fU8FE9RPDHRVZEo4nA8i48YCsm dusKYCQpNu+2cXBNmrP9/w0Bv4Nxp58LrmuubOtxnIpFK8xK4IvmeOSU7FQS3jEzvaiQ FqpHlcg+mYZ1wLnYtAmFEGDK5axJliO99aaGBvK+T0F4dAz62f3zFAKw9fMSWyDSiUAF Zk8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9lBj+fXUlYI3ShjCJ1Pt28qTOcgJGTMFzLYw7a/KtuQ=; b=OqwFOIslVIeIqflkxIwIXu1KQl7CyrzILMXchNCwYzKZyPoncyQNcyVFQUnGIwkXBV 1EXQk2DirpPOhh9RtFtKOBi6yyYsZ8gixN4YHAv83vUU+VJQofEo+r1KNsDLNoaNpR6d ZCOzQJYJcSZJt6kaXeqaqlB4FojLx0QIQfVkkCsOT1bPIt7saJe5k8COjXpIA+h0lTH3 8ek7q7nVYy6QXLMo6qec948+aAQTDLG8zHHA2FU46yIcy10FCpD3BX29lKNAAcSxBjr9 8MQjsNpLh5SOhpDRes79Jgr1PjIoSg3zcqtYd+0f0b8PZW7iHN4nm6Mw2D+y9SLInXiY AooQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc/L7hcj3uY0891bO+2cYzL25KZhqPFVvEMfhN2NI5fdLocjNqe+SjVfMhko6RC12cmzsKEYqaOF7ogeKZN X-Received: by 10.200.35.117 with SMTP id b50mr642885qtb.38.1478042566501; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:22:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.85.208 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:22:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <307cf616-d7a0-be5b-1aa9-4b12f3c9abb0@basmevissen.nl> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:22:26 +0000 Message-ID: To: "Daniel." Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:22:48 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f41fc23b9670540459a99 --001a113f41fc23b9670540459a99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 1 November 2016 at 22:20, Daniel. wrote: > Just as a note, I've been using archlinux for about a year and have never > faced "distro related problems", except when the gcc6 comes out. Anyway I'm > using daisy in my work. I think that making old releases supported by X > distro doesn't make any sense... > The supported list of distros is just the list of distros that are known to work, and if something breaks then we'll notice and fix it. If you want to use arch and face the periodic problems such as new toolchain meaning you can't build gcc-cross, then go for it. Ross --001a113f41fc23b9670540459a99 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 1 November 2016 at 22:20, Daniel. <danielhilst@gmail.com> wrote:
Just as a note, I've= been using archlinux for about a year and have never faced "distro re= lated problems", except when the gcc6 comes out. Anyway I'm using = daisy in my work. I think that making old releases supported by X distro do= esn't make any sense...

The supported list of distros is just the list of distros= that are known to work, and if something breaks then we'll notice and = fix it.=C2=A0 If you want to use arch and face the periodic problems such a= s new toolchain meaning you can't build gcc-cross, then go for it.=C2= =A0

Ro= ss
--001a113f41fc23b9670540459a99-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4B291E0071C; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:35:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.192.193 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.192.193 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com (mail-pf0-f193.google.com [209.85.192.193]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E172E006E9 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f193.google.com with SMTP id a136so9461920pfa.0 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:35:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=QB5/mViZspfKdf3I8Ye7/4CZF74nYeI0s5oFPp91BAQ=; b=iaItKQcBLzqjBD6M2sljHZ3lSVI/BXXDX2FuSGnk5sh27Ck5jek5LQXEUAG1pITsc5 9xDG4vskkmrw4NXLMYsFv3J63TrmGU7BTAyovtDe6/SCZ+Ym95PxImGXoIII8WP8orjp Sd1z88qmur/xMrBQqjGL9oh+ZtqP1m5TTjul2f04K/l23XUuRTJEtOfX0fyTChSFGUii KMZfQOm4Ux/rY8ag8hvrv+hhIoHaRh4VAFm9gR4ZJtsMsASdXIzqcH2qGnEsvETZ6IN4 nkV4gbGlvNR8nHY+1b24ig053ZzlpLnHur79pvxXihovsarVOGJOKM4gm5ig2fCg7QZg ea7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=QB5/mViZspfKdf3I8Ye7/4CZF74nYeI0s5oFPp91BAQ=; b=MVU+UFb948v7JGiJxRVEQ/aPKagourKZXQrpysKCWYpCCJCL335bqscp/CccWvizWX oq9BRkzhYXwSVqdQKcD+rfuAa/0X2h2QCYeVgTn64LU3nuie/K5oHSdJFOZwN0HOEuRi OxSAhbAsayI2ynqCodUzYJcBGzQ1rrkG76Or/QXSgFaXegMWmCsIe3FQzTPSkBXiF1ld FtdwkF2NTKex/GBUGrnXQPoqb1xU/Iwdf78/2rotWuBFYpUFpR4azQQ9lx80cOIi/f5+ RNe2/V3DucvJg+6try5YRAowdR0TI+3gd0MlKX3uukxfXzoieW0acfvNfRFL0c2/UtR6 J5wg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveTRkNmgBBBsUG5zNg/R/TwaBvEKnypRayRxG5SzVJicjtCgnPXahgRPyAmDRS28A== X-Received: by 10.98.88.5 with SMTP id m5mr1115328pfb.9.1478043346298; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:8882:b8c:18f5:b6d7:3c24:7ad1? ([2601:646:8882:b8c:18f5:b6d7:3c24:7ad1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rx1sm20919460pab.32.2016.11.01.16.35.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail From: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:35:41 -0700 Message-Id: <43D47051-BE64-4A56-B81C-55199BB744FB@gmail.com> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <307cf616-d7a0-be5b-1aa9-4b12f3c9abb0@basmevissen.nl> To: "Burton, Ross" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:35:49 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 32762 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E36E960C-B5D4-4DC1-8CB1-24BD6AD4BDC6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 --Apple-Mail=_E36E960C-B5D4-4DC1-8CB1-24BD6AD4BDC6 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_210332B6-2D79-40F5-BD73-AEA0E1B05D45" --Apple-Mail=_210332B6-2D79-40F5-BD73-AEA0E1B05D45 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Burton, Ross = wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 1 November 2016 at 22:20, Daniel. > wrote: > Just as a note, I've been using archlinux for about a year and have = never faced "distro related problems", except when the gcc6 comes out. = Anyway I'm using daisy in my work. I think that making old releases = supported by X distro doesn't make any sense... >=20 > The supported list of distros is just the list of distros that are = known to work, and if something breaks then we'll notice and fix it. If = you want to use arch and face the periodic problems such as new = toolchain meaning you can't build gcc-cross, then go for it. Another option perhaps is to use a debian stable container with docker = (https://hub.docker.com/r/cbrake/oe-build/ = ) and you can use your favorite distro for stuff you usually do and at = same time let OE/YP build on a known/supported distro e.g. Its a bit of mind shift but I am happily using it, while my distro stays = bleeding edge arch. e.g. see http://bec-systems.com/site/1281/using-docker-for-oeyocto-builds = >=20 > Ross > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto --Apple-Mail=_210332B6-2D79-40F5-BD73-AEA0E1B05D45 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:


On 1 November 2016 at 22:20, Daniel. <danielhilst@gmail.com> = wrote:
Just= as a note, I've been using archlinux for about a year and have never = faced "distro related problems", except when the gcc6 comes out. Anyway = I'm using daisy in my work. I think that making old releases supported = by X distro doesn't make any sense...

The supported list of distros is just the list of = distros that are known to work, and if something breaks then we'll = notice and fix it.  If you want to use arch and face the periodic = problems such as new toolchain meaning you can't build gcc-cross, then = go for it. 

Another option perhaps is to use a debian stable = container with docker (https://hub.docker.com/r/cbrake/oe-build/)
and = you can use your favorite distro for stuff you usually do and at same = time let OE/YP build on  a known/supported distro = e.g.
Its a bit of mind shift but I am happily using it, while = my distro stays bleeding edge arch.

e.g. see



Ross
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

= --Apple-Mail=_210332B6-2D79-40F5-BD73-AEA0E1B05D45-- --Apple-Mail=_E36E960C-B5D4-4DC1-8CB1-24BD6AD4BDC6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlgZJtEACgkQuwUzVZGdMxSymwCgiRfIxoYuuHQ69/ZkqYXoK4rY BYwAn0ZRv/3LOtA5kpfI9xh/2Bxg1BEh =UH0r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E36E960C-B5D4-4DC1-8CB1-24BD6AD4BDC6-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A135BE007D3; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 03:05:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.55.52.88 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58431E006E9 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 03:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2016 03:05:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,583,1473145200"; d="scan'208,217";a="186683501" Received: from jlock-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.15.10]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2016 03:05:26 -0700 Message-ID: <1478081125.22552.6.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Joshua Lock To: "Burton, Ross" , Bas Mevissen Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:05:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:05:32 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-8YB2D0pF4A/D/+joFvPh" --=-8YB2D0pF4A/D/+joFvPh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 17:11 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas Mevissen wrote: > > What are the criteria to call a distro supported? > > > > > > The short version is that it's a distro that doesn't change too much, is still supported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject.org running that distro. > > The Centos mismatch is annoying, can you please file a bug? > We previously had CentOS-7.* which was changed to CentOSLinux-7 in meta-yocto ce1fe45e9a18a82e2b95ea7e0b088ba595ceeee6. What's going on here? Are CentOS really changing the value of their Distributor ID for a released version? Or is the issue here that they aren't using consistent values for Distributor ID and its equivalent across /etc/lsb-release, /etc/redhat- release, /etc/os-release and other potential sources? Can someone with a CentOS 7 box pastebin their /etc/lsb-release, /etc/redhat-release and /etc/os-release? Joshua > --=-8YB2D0pF4A/D/+joFvPh Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 17:11 +0000, Burton, Ro= ss wrote:

On 1 November 2016 at 17:05, Bas M= evissen <abuse@basmevissen.nl> wrote:
What are t= he criteria to call a distro supported?

The short version is that it's a distro that doesn= 't change too much, is still supported, and we have builders on autobuilder.yoctoproject.org runni= ng that distro.

The Centos m= ismatch is annoying, can you please file a bug?

We previously had CentOS-7.* which was changed to CentOSLi= nux-7 in meta-yocto ce1fe45e9a18a82e2b95ea7e0b088ba595ceeee6.
What's going on here? Are CentOS really changing the value of t= heir Distributor ID for a released version?
Or is the issue here = that they aren't using consistent values for Distributor ID and its equival= ent across /etc/lsb-release, /etc/redhat-release, /etc/os-release and other= potential sources?

Can someone with a CentOS 7 bo= x pastebin their /etc/lsb-release, /etc/redhat-release and /etc/os-release?=

Joshua
--=-8YB2D0pF4A/D/+joFvPh-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 3F97FE00B93; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:21:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_HEADERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (danielhilst[at]gmail.com) * 1.0 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.217.177 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.217.177 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-ua0-f177.google.com (mail-ua0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0A9E009FA for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 51so13757615uai.1 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:21:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=NPQEWExReWuFDaz/cr06R6NmrAmnLoeKI598y3Da5e4=; b=EB0A9Zudx0pkp2QA33awYtZvhW2RPOKshdxqZT1K63G6eHIWAXN00kTE3SYgPlxJms PPxerDn0yUPm0/70nvfxGlsA+EC0zOySLETl0tQIjUpXQYkp1g+Lg9zt7Dr+BuzcTeEA xpcg7OKuv4ZFCFfKE/zTYcrJj+pMycniF8cs2XyMvgZSy+Di8jzlXabf4RFBfdfhHtM9 cuIUWo/+nBKviAuP/kKILEQeiHTtQLBjc0mhR+cbTeSxzHN3jlLzNdi8RssumRYCJr0A +fVYJZQ82snNA0r7rDHLTh4NsKS9dlXEg68Tue4ErqlE7ve8gqyFvuPLAHgSXguh0kPP exHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=NPQEWExReWuFDaz/cr06R6NmrAmnLoeKI598y3Da5e4=; b=lAlYIIALSgHrPIgOYAqbEk79XTwrTcQD9Q4aWq9o5EnC5WpqNNBiRgfsGBLfvtkPXd Js0tfk5dPDbWdosMWVqLSzXIXYz7Tj5NwjdqLM+lANiZp+/+kVjCIZMCctZ/n044UUPz mlt7CpoWRbvTG5JHmA5ugxtbu9MD/jAKSAGA8EJhfvnc4WrsAe3x1EgtM93Ib2fVh00H vN60v8bXUvMDP1j8NFfEjLMTwZ93rOpTn7wgUVrTPmV7E3eLafgv63rgRFcepxOy2meu ctRvmEdybosCEjddXvqW7E7JLdl7cbRce5OcLnkmeqPDBg/DkpVfnKsx3njhI5F6tO4v o90Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveKaMG9+RDVtOCTeoBGU9207XkSsBIx77PUvpQ7Q71/HgYgOSG3npwRWIKDPnfct5nuyF07g9a5bYmpQw== X-Received: by 10.176.2.110 with SMTP id 101mr2670679uas.8.1478096495625; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:21:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.1.68 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:21:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <43D47051-BE64-4A56-B81C-55199BB744FB@gmail.com> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <307cf616-d7a0-be5b-1aa9-4b12f3c9abb0@basmevissen.nl> <43D47051-BE64-4A56-B81C-55199BB744FB@gmail.com> From: "Daniel." Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:21:34 -0200 Message-ID: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:21:39 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d1ad090d0d005405228cf --001a113d1ad090d0d005405228cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2016-11-01 21:35 GMT-02:00 Khem Raj : > > On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > On 1 November 2016 at 22:20, Daniel. wrote: > >> Just as a note, I've been using archlinux for about a year and have never >> faced "distro related problems", except when the gcc6 comes out. Anyway I'm >> using daisy in my work. I think that making old releases supported by X >> distro doesn't make any sense... >> > > The supported list of distros is just the list of distros that are known > to work, and if something breaks then we'll notice and fix it. If you want > to use arch and face the periodic problems such as new toolchain meaning > you can't build gcc-cross, then go for it. > > > Another option perhaps is to use a debian stable container with docker ( > https://hub.docker.com/r/cbrake/oe-build/) > and you can use your favorite distro for stuff you usually do and at same > time let OE/YP build on a known/supported distro e.g. > Its a bit of mind shift but I am happily using it, while my distro stays > bleeding edge arch. > > e.g. see > > http://bec-systems.com/site/1281/using-docker-for-oeyocto-builds > > > Ross > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > I'm planning to move to ubuntu 16.04 as I have in home, since I'm something like tired of reading the words "not supported" .. but I have a lot of work to do before I can format my machine there... So, it will be arch :) I was just notifying that I have never had problems with arch being "not supported". The packages needed there, and the ones that can't be found at binary repos can be found at AUR, so, arch works just fine. Regards, -- *"Do or do not. There is no try"* *Yoda Master* --001a113d1ad090d0d005405228cf Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2016-11-01 21:35 GMT-02:00 Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>:
On Nov 1, 2016, at 4= :22 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:


On 1 November 2016 at 22:20, Dan= iel. <danielhilst@gmail.com> wrote:
Just as a note, I've been using archlinux for about= a year and have never faced "distro related problems", except wh= en the gcc6 comes out. Anyway I'm using daisy in my work. I think that = making old releases supported by X distro doesn't make any sense...
=

The supported= list of distros is just the list of distros that are known to work, and if= something breaks then we'll notice and fix it.=C2=A0 If you want to us= e arch and face the periodic problems such as new toolchain meaning you can= 't build gcc-cross, then go for it.=C2=A0

Another option perhaps is to use a debian stabl= e container with docker (https://hub.docker.com/r/cbrake/oe-build/)
and you can use your favorite distro for stuff you usually do and = at same time let OE/YP build on =C2=A0a known/supported distro e.g.
Its a bit of mind shift but I am happily using it, while my distro stays= bleeding edge arch.

e.g. see

=

= Ross
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailin= g list
yocto= @yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yoct= o


<= /div>
I'm planning to move to ubuntu 16.04 as= I have in home, since I'm something like tired of reading the words &q= uot;not supported" .. but I have a lot of work to do before I can form= at my machine there... So, it will be arch :)

I was just notifying that I have never had problems with arch be= ing "not supported". The packages needed there, and the ones that= can't be found at binary repos can be found at AUR, so, arch works jus= t fine.

Regards,
<= /div>

--
"= Do or do not. There is no try"
=C2=A0 Yoda Master<= /b>
--001a113d1ad090d0d005405228cf-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 0EFDDE00C92; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:28:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.180 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.220.180 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com (mail-qk0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A36EE00C82 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id o68so19786100qkf.3 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:28:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mtFb4Dpxgkty3RtB5ZV+2DGYEUVgMl0ScccdOpJjXAo=; b=jBN5w+GPhsaCWD0GODgktfeQ7qKwDE7UPWbdJxSG4BRO2oDVxu6jx8RaZ8eMG80Dsc ULfmHK2kNEVu+rxqhHUNbrgqyJS/qFbScFzQjlf1SpMip1MGYGfiubpK+UETLfEb3uau lLfhd2xNuRJQYVI3vCD16k3AX+GLWFM5Ih9z/LH3RPJYo4Mm6jLDNdm1/lJmnJ164EKM s1B1rP0ndbi+Qbxg/loei/rUfjr+E2TWpgw+bjg8ODsiN4mc9ppz+Ps461sPV1tYFZmW T/gaoApeJEL/Iii0xzP8gPCjVelDwBb0/hICbzplt4aeWV7DhazPe8BNAsPf8Ty/MFOx IEKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mtFb4Dpxgkty3RtB5ZV+2DGYEUVgMl0ScccdOpJjXAo=; b=P0hYLt7eJMc+/MuHspBaMBtoRIzkde1tt4IzAjKYFmEJEBWe7JIJY3HmT6IsefDRFA JX9KZwHGEFiFYASIne3oErlOjKL9Flr2exmgYDpyBlAloK3luJuphK3cqGFFC811UW3+ EfKqxB3v5khfQG3+GWuAmEqDYhJHNxUvw0uoScqdaci+AVN4quxgqf68G/XAZMYc4As0 eA0G+ylJq8LXb6khrCRr4BcLFYT2vvQFcF9p/MwMSEl4GhZJs3aeKPxxJqRWPsbJnhz0 f2XTt3PjOBLNl/gB5+p/626Y8IJLg7bFB/XH/M0tGg21G7oyP7gVlvKgDdXI+2pTsndn Senw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvek92lc1FkIyMyKHE3YJ+rAOSrakAq5n/wdKM/5hLb+KBBWlWRk7iLBDf02f/41icVoh7WePLF9QQMNU0IF X-Received: by 10.55.31.157 with SMTP id n29mr3235767qkh.221.1478096884588; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:28:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.85.208 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:27:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <307cf616-d7a0-be5b-1aa9-4b12f3c9abb0@basmevissen.nl> <43D47051-BE64-4A56-B81C-55199BB744FB@gmail.com> From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:27:44 +0000 Message-ID: To: "Daniel." Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:28:10 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147f228c0060b0540523f8d --001a1147f228c0060b0540523f8d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 2 November 2016 at 14:21, Daniel. wrote: > I'm planning to move to ubuntu 16.04 as I have in home, since I'm > something like tired of reading the words "not supported" .. but I have a > lot of work to do before I can format my machine there... So, it will be > arch :) > Ubuntu 16.04 is supported, the documentation is wrong and will be fixed. Arch is not, and never will be. Ross --001a1147f228c0060b0540523f8d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 2 November 2016 at 14:21, Daniel. <danielhilst@gmail.com> wrote:
I&= #39;m planning to move to ubuntu 16.04 as I have in home, since I'm som= ething like tired of reading the words "not supported" .. but I h= ave a lot of work to do before I can format my machine there... So, it will= be arch :)

Ubuntu 16.04 is supported, the documentation is wrong and will be fixed.= =C2=A0 Arch is not, and never will be.

=
Ross
--001a1147f228c0060b0540523f8d-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 6B027E0099B; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:41:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from hosting.emcodev.net (hosting.emcodev.net [178.18.92.162]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22491E00912 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hosting.emcodev.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BC012ADB8; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 17:41:33 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hosting.emcodev.net Received: from hosting.emcodev.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hosting.emcodev.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Vhl8E-ijf4h6; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 17:41:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from whisper.local (541CD0EC.cm-5-5d.dynamic.ziggo.nl [84.28.208.236]) (Authenticated sender: bas@emcodev.nl) by hosting.emcodev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 208CC12AE66; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 17:41:15 +0100 (CET) To: Joshua Lock , "Burton, Ross" References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <1478081125.22552.6.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Bas Mevissen Message-ID: <0627d708-e6f4-df7e-5653-2e8ae1008d1b@basmevissen.nl> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 17:41:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1478081125.22552.6.camel@linux.intel.com> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:41:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/11/16 11:05, Joshua Lock wrote: > Can someone with a CentOS 7 box pastebin their /etc/lsb-release, > /etc/redhat-release and /etc/os-release? > /etc/lsb-release not available At launch (1406): /etc/redhat-release (link to /etc/centos-release): CentOS Linux release 7.2.1406 (Core) /etc/os-release: NAME="CentOS Linux" VERSION="7 (Core)" ID="centos" ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="7" PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" ANSI_COLOR="0;31" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/" Currently (1511): /etc/redhat-release (link to /etc/centos-release): CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) /etc/os-release: NAME="CentOS Linux" VERSION="7 (Core)" ID="centos" ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="7" PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" ANSI_COLOR="0;31" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/" CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7" CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7" So it seems to me that things have not changed in an unexpected way. -- Bas. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 17644E00B3D; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:31:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [134.134.136.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA439E00A64 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2016 14:31:49 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,436,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="26766319" Received: from jlock-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.15.10]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2016 14:31:47 -0700 Message-ID: <1478122306.22552.59.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Joshua Lock To: Bas Mevissen , "Burton, Ross" Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:31:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: <0627d708-e6f4-df7e-5653-2e8ae1008d1b@basmevissen.nl> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <1478081125.22552.6.camel@linux.intel.com> <0627d708-e6f4-df7e-5653-2e8ae1008d1b@basmevissen.nl> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:31:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 17:41 +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote: > On 02/11/16 11:05, Joshua Lock wrote: > > > > > Can someone with a CentOS 7 box pastebin their /etc/lsb-release, > > /etc/redhat-release and /etc/os-release? > > > > /etc/lsb-release not available > > > At launch (1406): > > /etc/redhat-release (link to /etc/centos-release): > CentOS Linux release 7.2.1406 (Core) > > /etc/os-release: > NAME="CentOS Linux" > VERSION="7 (Core)" > ID="centos" > ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" > VERSION_ID="7" > PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" > ANSI_COLOR="0;31" > CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" > HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/" > BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/" > > > > Currently (1511): > > /etc/redhat-release (link to /etc/centos-release): > CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) > > /etc/os-release: > NAME="CentOS Linux" > VERSION="7 (Core)" > ID="centos" > ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" > VERSION_ID="7" > PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" > ANSI_COLOR="0;31" > CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" > HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/" > BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/" > > CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7" > CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7" > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos" > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7" > > So it seems to me that things have not changed in an unexpected way. Thank you! Any chance you can share the output of `lsb_release -ir` also? Regards, Joshua From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4E843E00B3D; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 18:17:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0729BE00A64 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 18:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id v84so51751419oie.3 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 18:17:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+P7GkTR0h7d3XTuw630GKohaF+gQn60Ym+oR9krDS9Y=; b=dnP1FDRNQLmdscjvUociSnqL8Qz0mW8CegevTCMlnk4DdkJxEv7CzBffe/Q90dDoQr b0NqMU1/792NVpKatLI36YGcuzsTAFra2n8paOhJGHyxQa8URrYm+i2+LGHbBEjRHLkU 8t7fVvv7iTB2LFC7MYDwt/C4yQ4ny3Zg/4rE0mf1tSstC6E3hLy/qdMxmb7uaW0FVbdf mUr6xb7TsVWuK8XINMsv0fuXLZl/h71dRgN364uF1Gf9LVNCzTFOHNVlAaYtEl708hL+ fJQTC0mctYTk5FQZMXyuI4Rk6yH8CgmZ1SONs27JzB+UvzXFuAS8yR7NZIB2CB02Pmvm 3jEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+P7GkTR0h7d3XTuw630GKohaF+gQn60Ym+oR9krDS9Y=; b=BZ9BE9qeD2LW+O4J2T1syQmYlbVLEapfEwl4ilB2WNBkbYIis6YUpYjYukEvzGeFyD EmgBo/OiY8720mUixAqjH+W738Lk6rNvvJ4JF4FuyRi3FrJMoHNeuCi7McBGjk1QKoVn 5L7NVkARQBeEs2AjBBUvgLFHj/RJW9lkEKiU4hgIC9HxbJs78VYLaZVFH6mnEFOjzez9 XTpXDY5qoaxp1CU2gHZRDIazQ11IMEKWVlI//+RHc7+iOEo+EsRbGy8lWl/nvrrjjUbP gcZ8kkcM6ns6pBHZtTRcajjINrhj+bxWIDKAGTNFKB3u5lrmJx1mzisMF94uDo17k0Va 9mvg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc7M0mogE6h+eVEccWjZBoT46XF9tpBnHMi+cwdutkJ1fc9us6VfjRaAazX1Y5Vgw== X-Received: by 10.36.125.5 with SMTP id b5mr4136764itc.62.1478135845751; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 18:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.24.73] (96-92-69-241-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [96.92.69.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c101sm1872910ioj.25.2016.11.02.18.17.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 18:17:24 -0700 (PDT) To: "Rifenbark, Scott M" References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> From: Trevor Woerner Message-ID: <788fc806-0988-46d0-29c3-7965591a35b8@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 21:17:23 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 01:17:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/01/2016 11:27 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Scott, can you update the list at > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#detailed-supported-distros > so that it reflects the list in the code: > > SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?= " \ > poky-1.8 \n \ > poky-2.0 \n \ > poky-2.1 \n \ > poky-2.2 \n \ > Ubuntu-14.04 \n \ > Ubuntu-14.10 \n \ > Ubuntu-15.04 \n \ > Ubuntu-15.10 \n \ > Ubuntu-16.04 \n \ > Fedora-22 \n \ > Fedora-23 \n \ > Fedora-24 \n \ > CentOSLinux-7.* \n \ > Debian-8.* \n \ > openSUSE-13.2 \n \ > SUSELINUX-42.1 \n \ > " The website also needs to list openSUSE 42.1 (Leap). Thanks! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2EF7EE00BB0; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 03:34:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072D4E00A64 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 03:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2016 03:34:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,438,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="1063335995" Received: from jlock-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.11.22]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2016 03:34:13 -0700 Message-ID: <1478169252.31055.5.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Joshua Lock To: Bas Mevissen , "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 10:34:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1478122306.22552.59.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <1478081125.22552.6.camel@linux.intel.com> <0627d708-e6f4-df7e-5653-2e8ae1008d1b@basmevissen.nl> <1478122306.22552.59.camel@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 10:34:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 21:31 +0000, Joshua Lock wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 17:41 +0100, Bas Mevissen wrote: > > > > On 02/11/16 11:05, Joshua Lock wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Can someone with a CentOS 7 box pastebin their /etc/lsb-release, > > > /etc/redhat-release and /etc/os-release? > > > > > > > /etc/lsb-release not available > > > > > > At launch (1406): > > > > /etc/redhat-release (link to /etc/centos-release): > > CentOS Linux release 7.2.1406 (Core) > > > > /etc/os-release: > > NAME="CentOS Linux" > > VERSION="7 (Core)" > > ID="centos" > > ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" > > VERSION_ID="7" > > PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" > > ANSI_COLOR="0;31" > > CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" > > HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/" > > BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/" > > > > > > > > Currently (1511): > > > > /etc/redhat-release (link to /etc/centos-release): > > CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) > > > > /etc/os-release: > > NAME="CentOS Linux" > > VERSION="7 (Core)" > > ID="centos" > > ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" > > VERSION_ID="7" > > PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" > > ANSI_COLOR="0;31" > > CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7" > > HOME_URL="https://www.centos.org/" > > BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.centos.org/" > > > > CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT="CentOS-7" > > CENTOS_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="7" > > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="centos" > > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7" > > > > So it seems to me that things have not changed in an unexpected > > way. > > Thank you! Any chance you can share the output of `lsb_release -ir` > also? Not to worry, I used a CentOS container to test this myself: # lsb_release -ir Distributor ID: CentOS Release:        7.2.1511 The problem is that we check multiple sources for a distro's name, favouring the output of lsb_release -ir. If you have lsb_release available your system is reported as CentOS, otherwise we fall back to reading os-release or redhat-release and get CentOSLinux. I've filed a bug to track this issue: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10591 Regards, Joshua From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 26499E00C09; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 05:59:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from hosting.emcodev.net (hosting.emcodev.net [178.18.92.162]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66EFE00BB0 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 05:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hosting.emcodev.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7174212AECC; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:59:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hosting.emcodev.net Received: from hosting.emcodev.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hosting.emcodev.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9X2OcYSs4SCr; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:59:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from whisper.local (541CD0EC.cm-5-5d.dynamic.ziggo.nl [84.28.208.236]) (Authenticated sender: bas@emcodev.nl) by hosting.emcodev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A42412AD13; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:59:17 +0100 (CET) To: Joshua Lock , "Burton, Ross" References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <1478081125.22552.6.camel@linux.intel.com> <0627d708-e6f4-df7e-5653-2e8ae1008d1b@basmevissen.nl> <1478122306.22552.59.camel@linux.intel.com> <1478169252.31055.5.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Bas Mevissen Message-ID: <8cf56f7e-f7d2-564f-db4c-ab4bbdab799b@basmevissen.nl> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:59:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1478169252.31055.5.camel@linux.intel.com> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:59:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/11/16 11:34, Joshua Lock wrote: > Not to worry, I used a CentOS container to test this myself: > > # lsb_release -ir > Distributor ID: CentOS > Release: 7.2.1511 > I got the same result. > The problem is that we check multiple sources for a distro's name, > favouring the output of lsb_release -ir. > > If you have lsb_release available your system is reported as CentOS, > otherwise we fall back to reading os-release or redhat-release and get > CentOSLinux. > It appears that I got lsb_release on my CentOS host by installing the Google Chrome RPM, which required lsb >= 4.0. > I've filed a bug to track this issue: > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10591 > Thanks, tracking it. -- Bas. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A4E04E009A5; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:27:33 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.220.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com (mail-qk0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0320EE00831 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:27:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q130so177759194qke.1 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 06:27:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fpm7nE6UYLfV7gqTg0Tb91utFB731dgLhJabouvOBf8=; b=RpWUU+XTHr5iFTKD0B1xW/Pj8gA/32FD6S//FLuMblMFefGK/UdiZNmiMWOBhK1IL2 ibWFOL5XkB3IQPjDUbb/nwB4fi6FFm+NWHdOMnCTv0byyxS5y/fFED3X3RhuRshvrHxz Nis53S2Um+1qOZw/vc3Z/kbqzgHMKQi9Mh+ArwDWQYX0vRsWl699iz6oHdUlApI3gToI 9/4ky8CkzVf6FmA8fNi/OKDqtx+lY1GAMs+0KRbNUXsGwP0kVVd/ReEpTcydcaSfk1pq t2T4q4JJbZNmK+mZPZEu2sZagCX3qKrsv2zsSAcaWasTZQBqu4VRMpcqY+dC0IQCWQ1l /psw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fpm7nE6UYLfV7gqTg0Tb91utFB731dgLhJabouvOBf8=; b=Ne0Tm1OHWWErXWgkxGb27z8EpjIhXFNoVJrec8wLVOUkQdnDWuFxTTGpB4AqPO0EMf Ybe2d74TB9ay7EFFcLGz0rDQOQZVGubuQnJYdMgFq0U3qes6v5sODKGaZdqZ2DJJSI6B zLKZIbCMvvYbthO8SXTt7g41dzy7LWCOrDyN/lLWMQgtZqBT97aG2oR7ZGzfYuFpgQMW TZXe6czSxUPT+L9PSo/IS9TdnT7tgMTSbOngm1EFtDzRGFjn1gh7Et/Te2mfR9N5PmFf aL/qvTZuqijA/iuQOUsJCYJPrkJmEpE9jjJzi3MrfPtiM9YOFW40JfM9BrOfGkDmcTWZ 4gcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcpxR1kzxMFdrVQ2VyolRYqpMEaCVW5JsigoAyz26HknzpYlPB7SU+rzsl1sJUVVvJs+9kmE7ywcV6F1K2m X-Received: by 10.55.31.157 with SMTP id n29mr6684295qkh.221.1478528850358; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 06:27:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.85.136 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:27:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Burton, Ross" Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:27:09 +0000 Message-ID: To: Scott Rifenbark Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:27:33 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147f228ea8e260540b6d290 --001a1147f228ea8e260540b6d290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Scott, On 3 November 2016 at 20:21, Scott Rifenbark wrote: > See http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref- > manual.html#detailed-supported-distros and let me know if this is okay. > If so, I will make sure the same commit is on my yocto-docs/morty branch. > I updated master only for now > Both of the suse entries should be styled a "openSUSE ", the change of case is due to technical nonsense and not what the user will see. Apart from that, looks good. Ross --001a1147f228ea8e260540b6d290 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Scott,

On 3 November 2016 at 20:21, Scott Rifenbark= <srifenbark@gmail.com> wrote:
See http://www.yoc= toproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#detailed-s= upported-distros and let me know if this is okay.=C2=A0 If so, I will m= ake sure the same commit is on my yocto-docs/morty branch.=C2=A0 I updated = master only for now

=C2=A0
Both of the suse entries should be styled a "openSUSE <ver= sion>", the change of case is due to technical nonsense and not wha= t the user will see.

Apart from that, looks good.

Ross
--001a1147f228ea8e260540b6d290-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 0C719E004E5; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:22:57 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (avery.brian[at]gmail.com) * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.217.195 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.217.195 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ua0-f195.google.com (mail-ua0-f195.google.com [209.85.217.195]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D31E00498 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ua0-f195.google.com with SMTP id 20so6710766uak.0 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:22:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=whGF342DyR3t2HWFOlFnmWQnxYaONk9UkGSjq46G91c=; b=Xf1C5swEHhyRfJ76dQyZNvPQAdJYbFL27nt56IjpgS7/Ih7CDbFUX3gKfS9M1Gh0Ek N5PK62rI8uwKI7qLpMOZmvxtukccZGoyiTu+txFVCS4V4fPMp0ZK24GSROnFmH5Q3AU9 +c1q5gY9qLSbOZdN4LuFtizs/gMOOUMfHUcH1jFbmE6NWzt7+Ko+zqe1Z6pnXF6LbBUl oG/1d3IYEFy4zQ8baYJ27tNpY4ht/M0370crpTLWtgjcYJt8X72SgV7G9E/8QV76dlJM fxEakg/kVKXfNuJqmjnIOm6Cfab2dyvGErzptcjIHZv+uDiVVQAGSKDfFIs9C3ghSe/d LXrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=whGF342DyR3t2HWFOlFnmWQnxYaONk9UkGSjq46G91c=; b=AaUooOps7VEVghYqZn6KcwnBR14LOw+zRt8CCv8wZOsVQtl3oHQSPXxuI4ZH3ZmUnd TYK7Yfd3MM6i+tSwSE1kp1tMgKp0yrtkQgxxVamdiuIGhVMGVDBmUPfbrsV2TqZGIl+C BT/TYEIiXnkw55Wur/o4bjtJWUKGpAzsksscSfv2CC5vdEG0rg4BUwFBIH5CPNouXys2 mRwnNCq9bscbB3DaSGNuui/NIOT4Hty+Cgf3yYoBE8GoigHPVMMzLsk2Ist9k2Qmbd8Z 8qnz+0Ht7EKydTjFv169UFR7UOPzEQAU5bdBqh563Lv8kkaBR4aKsU9EasUhKF6SOi7v WUkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdyA5kyBydtQ215eNFwVk1AA1Ecr/fv+VHBlduLvv5LkawF8e23hIYQh6xkDfbrYnRmBYOXZHaPpB3zFA== X-Received: by 10.159.35.208 with SMTP id 74mr6265778uao.33.1478557374298; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:22:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.67.72 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:22:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <43D47051-BE64-4A56-B81C-55199BB744FB@gmail.com> References: <30C2D590D16A5C46ADFE6521910377987FF67BEA@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <21973d42-dc69-ee7b-031d-ac5544823c8f@basmevissen.nl> <307cf616-d7a0-be5b-1aa9-4b12f3c9abb0@basmevissen.nl> <43D47051-BE64-4A56-B81C-55199BB744FB@gmail.com> From: Brian Avery Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:22:53 -0800 Message-ID: To: Khem Raj Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Yocto 2.2 Morty supported Linux Distros X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 22:22:57 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c03cad0133f190540bd7752 --94eb2c03cad0133f190540bd7752 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To add more options, there's also a set of CROPS (YP subproject) Docker containers aimed at supporting a general build environment for YP, one aimed at the extensible sdk, and several for toaster depending on the desired version. poky/oe: https://hub.docker.com/r/crops/poky/ extensible-sdk: https://github.com/crops/extsdk-container toaster: https://hub.docker.com/r/crops/toaster/ (last official release) https://hub.docker.com/r/crops/toaster-krogoth/ https://hub.docker.com/r/crops/toaster-morty/ https://hub.docker.com/r/crops/toaster-master/ There are instructions for using the CROPS containers on Mac & Windows as well. https://github.com/crops/docker-win-mac-docs/wiki BR, Brian an intel employee On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > On 1 November 2016 at 22:20, Daniel. wrote: > >> Just as a note, I've been using archlinux for about a year and have never >> faced "distro related problems", except when the gcc6 comes out. Anyway I'm >> using daisy in my work. I think that making old releases supported by X >> distro doesn't make any sense... >> > > The supported list of distros is just the list of distros that are known > to work, and if something breaks then we'll notice and fix it. If you want > to use arch and face the periodic problems such as new toolchain meaning > you can't build gcc-cross, then go for it. > > > Another option perhaps is to use a debian stable container with docker ( > https://hub.docker.com/r/cbrake/oe-build/) > and you can use your favorite distro for stuff you usually do and at same > time let OE/YP build on a known/supported distro e.g. > Its a bit of mind shift but I am happily using it, while my distro stays > bleeding edge arch. > > e.g. see > > http://bec-systems.com/site/1281/using-docker-for-oeyocto-builds > > > Ross > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > --94eb2c03cad0133f190540bd7752 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To add more options, there's also a set= of CROPS (YP subproject) =C2=A0Docker containers aimed at supporting a gen= eral build environment for YP, one aimed at the extensible sdk, and several= for toaster depending on the desired version.

https://hub.docker.com/r/crops/toaster-morty/



There are instructions for using = the CROPS containers on Mac & Windows as well.

BR,
Brian=
an intel employee





On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:

On No= v 1, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:

=

On 1 November 201= 6 at 22:20, Daniel. <danielhilst@gmail.com> wrote:
Just as a note, I've been using archl= inux for about a year and have never faced "distro related problems&qu= ot;, except when the gcc6 comes out. Anyway I'm using daisy in my work.= I think that making old releases supported by X distro doesn't make an= y sense...

The supported list of distros is just the list of distros that are known t= o work, and if something breaks then we'll notice and fix it.=C2=A0 If = you want to use arch and face the periodic problems such as new toolchain m= eaning you can't build gcc-cross, then go for it.=C2=A0

Another option perhaps is to use = a debian stable container with docker (https://hub.docker.com/r/cbrake/oe= -build/)
and you can use your favorite distro for stuff you u= sually do and at same time let OE/YP build on =C2=A0a known/supported distr= o e.g.
Its a bit of mind shift but I am happily using it, while m= y distro stays bleeding edge arch.

e.g. see
<= div>


Ross
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailin= g list
yocto= @yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yoct= o


--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto<= br>

--94eb2c03cad0133f190540bd7752--