From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com (mail-yw0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D96719BB for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f172.google.com with SMTP id h14so54804084ywa.2 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SONYYF9s2/ikRKu7ezJuSA+tzXeDurcOYAMT0/Fhu4A=; b=Ub5KMfFmVDHULhR4cywit3sPh+Cny5lIJQiI99ZykEPx+IJGHJzUUgd422hRsCpwiE gIoAZECtSgDNtYs1wdY/u1JAyiwBWjJ5waiRC5ZbrkqBOfgGMJ8PoW/Gh3bKlR0lQUwu Hvu9kljlLZNizJcefc7IAMjfggLNYAXSFyyJj/wqW5wkAX0rLVnNgTX0G5/V8s1UZZnX rt0xLEfUSeRFZ1k22312CQtsYg6ka5yRmoQ33EjEbpQNuDOWZyTVt/l3W60Wv+19nM0a YYsgt8olLT4wjWcCSUjsPJWG2q+T5DjTvci0kfrO7fwtVxBhFarnBllGnLSS1pVUBu2g 1eEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SONYYF9s2/ikRKu7ezJuSA+tzXeDurcOYAMT0/Fhu4A=; b=XE22mSvp0z6JJJasZbKv+YqgSzmoA/hKhrM4tHrkHu3giOuNh+M7BqsPdqrXr/G6TH beyA0G2am2zA3lrRcW5Zcc4BRngV5W9ticYp1sV0h8Rb1lWxMUUfAsLzEajrxYk0XswU rxz76Ysa0rxDkejWCqS3zRKNpB+pL1x5g/EDQd65Ko0MWozQAj9Dcj0EveNoUkbKshzN ImFVQeI64I1MKRV2rEti1jcdzJfj9EJutuym406sW3d+UOj8IhRqKPJCN21jQB7GD0HT XRDs6rzaCd3MkyGhqj/UZVOwyhEaBJxwOWsPXWU3UnOHIQ2Eoklf3WBeNyCwR5Qdzsyi jPXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdKBF8Nr4iFizJGjw3QgI4kaU959Y7QWTm7O+IOBiPwVBhZ8Jj4KkmYs7SYozpWdXRK X-Received: by 10.107.6.160 with SMTP id f32mr3695498ioi.201.1478191973803; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8E52F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.229.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k81sm3079296iod.20.2016.11.03.09.52.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Nov 2016 09:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1478191970.13356.103.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Alexander Kanavin Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 17:52:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6511599a-ddb1-77b0-f42e-69afeaa60cae@linux.intel.com> References: <6511599a-ddb1-77b0-f42e-69afeaa60cae@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Eggleton , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: using devtool for rebasing patches X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 16:52:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 18:01 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Hello Paul, > > it would be very useful if devtool offered support for rebasing source > patches when they fail to apply +1 for that. I tried it the other way around: first "devtool modify", then rebasing using git (which only works when the recipe fetches from a git repo), and finally changing the recipe such that it refers to the version I rebased onto. But that version change in the recipe confused "devtool update-recipe" considerably (as in "added all patches between the version", if I remember correctly). -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.