From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: vgupta@synopsys.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:09:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147923698712210@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arc-timer-rtc-implement-read-loop-in-c-vs.-inline-asm.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 922cc171998ac3dbe74d57011ef7ed57e9b0d7df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:09:52 -0700
Subject: ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm
From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
commit 922cc171998ac3dbe74d57011ef7ed57e9b0d7df upstream.
The current code doesn't even compile as somehow the inline assembly
can't see the register names defined as ARC_RTC_*
I'm pretty sure It worked when I first got it merged, but the tools were
definitely different then.
So better to write this in "C" anyways.
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arc/kernel/time.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/arc/kernel/time.c
@@ -152,14 +152,17 @@ static cycle_t arc_read_rtc(struct clock
cycle_t full;
} stamp;
-
- __asm__ __volatile(
- "1: \n"
- " lr %0, [AUX_RTC_LOW] \n"
- " lr %1, [AUX_RTC_HIGH] \n"
- " lr %2, [AUX_RTC_CTRL] \n"
- " bbit0.nt %2, 31, 1b \n"
- : "=r" (stamp.low), "=r" (stamp.high), "=r" (status));
+ /*
+ * hardware has an internal state machine which tracks readout of
+ * low/high and updates the CTRL.status if
+ * - interrupt/exception taken between the two reads
+ * - high increments after low has been read
+ */
+ do {
+ stamp.low = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_LOW);
+ stamp.high = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_HIGH);
+ status = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_CTRL);
+ } while (!(status & _BITUL(31)));
return stamp.full;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vgupta@synopsys.com are
queue-4.8/arc-implement-arch-specific-dma_map_ops.mmap.patch
queue-4.8/arc-timer-rtc-implement-read-loop-in-c-vs.-inline-asm.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-11-15 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147923698712210@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.